This study examined variation in learners’ individual differences in data-driven learning, including foreign language enjoyment and anxiety, engagement, and autonomy, as well as learners’ writing quality and the impact of these individual differences on writing quality. Using a longitudinal mixed-methods design, this study tracked changes in the individual differences and writing quality of 15 English-major English-as-a-foreign-language undergraduates across 3 time points. Quantitative data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models and post-hoc pairwise comparisons, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The results showed that the data-driven-learning approach contributed to a significant increase in learning autonomy and writing quality. Furthermore, learners’ foreign language enjoyment, behavioral engagement, and autonomy were found to be significant predictors of their writing quality in the data-driven-learning instruction. Findings in this study could enrich the understanding of how individual differences function in a data-driven-learning context, enabling teachers to develop more tailored data-driven-learning instructional strategies.
AlbertÁ.CsizérK. (2022). Investigating individual differences with qualitative research methods: Results of a meta-analysis of leading applied linguistics journals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.6
2.
AlsehibanyR. A.AbdelhalimS. M. (2025). Overcoming academic vocabulary errors through online corpus consultation: The case of Saudi English majors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(5–6), 1033–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2249503
3.
Al-ShabandarR.HussainA.LiatsisP.KeightR. (2018). Analyzing learners’ behavior in MOOCs: An examination of performance and motivation using a data-driven approach. IEEE Access, 6, 73669–73685. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876755
4.
AlsowatH. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement, and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108–121.
5.
BellC. A.DobbelaerM. J.KletteK.VisscherA. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 3–29.
6.
BensonP. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge.
7.
BernardiniS. (2001). “Spoilt for choice”: A learner explores general language corpora. In AstonG. (Ed.), Learning with corpora (pp. 220–249). Athelstan.
8.
BernardiniS. (2004). Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In SinclairJ. McH. (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 15–36). John Benjamins.
9.
BielekeM.GogolK.GoetzT.DanielsL.PekrunR. (2021). The AEQ-S: A short version of the achievement emotions questionnaire. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, Article 101940.
10.
BosmansD.HurdS. (2016). Phonological attainment and foreign language anxiety in distance language learning: A quantitative approach. Distance Education, 37(3), 287–301.
11.
BoultonA. (2010). Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language learning, 60(3), 534–572.
12.
BoultonA. (2012). Computer corpora in language learning: DST approaches to research. Mélanges Crapel, 33, 79–91.
13.
BoultonA. (2017). Research timeline: Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 50(4), 483–506.
14.
BoultonA.CobbT. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
15.
BoultonA.VyatkinaN. (2021). Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 66–89.
16.
BråtenI.BranteE. W.StrømsøH. I. (2018). What really matters: The role of behavioural engagement in multiple document literacy tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12247
17.
BråtenI.LatiniN.HaverkampY. E. (2022). Predictors and outcomes of behavioral engagement in the context of text comprehension: When quantity means quality. Reading and Writing, 35(3), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10205-x
18.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
19.
BrysbaertM. (2025). Applying mixed-effects models in research on second language acquisition: A tutorial for beginners. Languages, 10(2), 20.
20.
BuilI.CatalánS.MartínezE. (2020). Engagement in business simulation games: A self-system model of motivational development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12762
ChambersA.O’SullivanI. (2004). Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL, 16(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004001211
23.
CharlesM.HadleyG. (2022). Autonomous corpus use by graduate students: A long-term trend study (2009–2017). Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56, Article 101095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101095
24.
ChenL. (2023). Learner autonomy and English achievement in Chinese EFL undergraduates: The mediating role of ambiguity tolerance and foreign language classroom anxiety. Language Learning in Higher Education, 13, 295–308.
25.
ChenM.FlowerdewJ. (2018a). A critical review of research and practice in data-driven learning (DDL) in the academic writing classroom. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 335–369.
26.
ChenM.FlowerdewJ. (2018b). Introducing data-driven learning to PhD students for research writing purposes: A territory-wide project in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 97–112.
27.
ChenN.LiY. M.HuiA. N. N. (2025). Exploring foreign language classroom emotions and their impact on achievement in China: Validating the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire—Short Form and resupply. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), Article 100158.
28.
ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of student engagement. Springer.
29.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
CortesV. (2011). Genre analysis in the academic writing class: with or without corpora?Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Lingüístics, 16, 65–80.
31.
CotosE.LinkS.HuffmanS. (2017). Effects of DDL technology on genre learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 104–130.
32.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Language Policy Unit.
33.
CsizérK.AlbertÁ. (2021). Trait and state perspectives of individual difference research. In GregersenT.MercerS. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the psychology of language learning and teaching (pp. 339–349). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321498-31
34.
DaskalovskaN. (2015). Corpus-based versus traditional learning of collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.803982
35.
De Saint LégerD.StorchN. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269–285.
36.
DengR.BenckendorffP.GannawayD. (2020). Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245–262.
37.
DewaeleJ. M. (2012). Personality: Personality traits as independent and dependent variables. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 42–57). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_4
38.
DewaeleJ. M.AlfawzanM. (2018). Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety in foreign language performance?Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 149–170.
39.
DewaeleJ. M.DewaeleL. (2017). The dynamic interactions in foreign language classroom anxiety and foreign language enjoyment of pupils aged 12 to 18. A pseudo-longitudinal investigation. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 12–22.
40.
DewaeleJ. M.MacIntyreP. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of FL learning? In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Multilingual Matters.
41.
DewaeleJ. M.SaitoK.HalimiF. (2025). How teacher behaviour shapes foreign language learners’ enjoyment, anxiety and attitudes/motivation: A mixed modelling longitudinal investigation. Language Teaching Research, 29(4), 1580–1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221089601
42.
DewaeleJ. M.WitneyJ.SaitoK.DewaeleL. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817692161
43.
DewaeleJ.-M.LiC. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World [Chinese 外语界], 196(1), 34–49.
44.
Diez-OrtegaM.KyleK. (2024). Measuring the development of lexical richness of L2 Spanish: A longitudinal learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(1), 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000384
DingY.ZhuJ. (2025). Mobile based peer feedback in EFL speaking: Learners’ motivation, behavioral engagement in feedback provision, and achievement. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(1), 10.
47.
DongJ.WangH. (2025). Exploring the effectiveness of a DDL-GenAI teaching mode in students’ EFL writing classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2577369
48.
DongJ.ZhaoY.BuckinghamL. (2023). Charting the landscape of data-driven learning using a bibliometric analysis. ReCALL, 35(3), 339–355. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344022000222
49.
DuH.ListA. (2020). Researching and writing based on multiple texts. Learning and Instruction, 66, Article 101297.
50.
DuanS.ShiZ. (2024). A longitudinal study of formulaic sequence use in second language writing: Complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 497–530.
51.
LiuE.DewaeleJ. M.WangJ. (2024). Developing a short language classroom engagement scale (LCES) and linking it with needs satisfaction and achievement. System, 120, Article 103189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103189
52.
Elahi ShirvanM.TaherianT.YazdanmehrE. (2024). Foreign language enjoyment: A longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis–curve of factors model. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(2), 224–242.
53.
ElaishM. M.ShuibL.GhaniN. A.YadegaridehkordiE. (2019). Mobile English language learning (MELL): A literature review. Educational Review, 71(2), 257–276.
54.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
55.
EllisR. (2010). EPILOGUE: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349.
56.
Finkenstaedt-QuinnS. A.WattsF. M.ShultzG. V. (2024). Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer review and revision in writing-to-learn. Assessing Writing, 59, Article 100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808
57.
FlowerdewL. (2015). Corpus-based research and pedagogy in EAP: From lexis to genre. Language Teaching, 48(1), 99–116.
58.
Frankenberg-GarciaA. (2014). The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production. ReCALL, 26(2), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000052
59.
Frankenberg-GarciaA.LewR.RobertsJ. C.ReesG. P.SharmaN. (2019). Developing a writing assistant to help EAP writers with collocations in real time. ReCALL, 31(1), 23–39.
60.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
61.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
62.
FryerL. K.Oga-BaldwinW. L. Q. (2019). Succeeding at junior high school: Students’ reasons, their reach, and the teaching that h(inders)elps their grasp. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, Article 101778.
63.
GelusoJ.YamaguchiA. (2014). Discovering formulaic language through data-driven learning: Student attitudes and efficacy. ReCALL, 26(2), 225–242.
64.
GilquinG.GrangerS. (2010). How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 359–369). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-31
65.
GriffithsC.SoruçA. (2020). Individual differences in language learning. Springer.
66.
GuoJ. P.YangL. Y.ZhangJ.GanY. J. (2022). Academic self-concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students: Relationships and causal ordering. Higher Education, 83(4), 809–828.
67.
GuoY. (2021). Exploring the dynamic interplay between foreign language enjoyment and learner engagement with regard to EFL achievement and absenteeism: A sequential mixed methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 766058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766058
68.
GuoY.XuJ.ChenC. (2023). Measurement of engagement in the foreign language classroom and its effect on language achievement: The case of Chinese college EFL students. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(3), 1225–1270.
69.
HeX. S.LoewenS. (2022). Stimulating learner engagement in app-based L2 vocabulary self-study: Goals and feedback for effective L2 pedagogy. System, 105, Article 102719.
70.
HeckelC.Messerschmidt-GrandiC.RingeisenT. (2021). Learners’ characteristics, test anxiety, learning efforts, and performance: Validating their structural relationships. Educational Psychology, 41(9), 1117–1138.
71.
HorwitzE. K. (2017). On the misreading of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope (1986) and the need to balance anxiety research and the experiences of anxious language learners. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 31–50). Multilingual Matters.
72.
HorwitzE. K.HorwitzM. B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
73.
HuP.ZhangJ. (2017). A pathway to learner autonomy: A self-determination theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18, 147–157.
74.
HuangY. M.SilitongaL. M.WuT. T. (2022). Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills. Computers and Education, 183, Article 104494.
75.
HylandK. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116–125.
76.
JelasZ.AzmanN.ZulnaidiH.AhmadN. (2016). Learning support and academic achievement among Malaysian adolescents: The mediating role of student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 19, 221–240.
77.
JiangY.PengJ. E. (2025). Exploring the relationships between learners’ engagement, autonomy, and academic performance in an English language MOOC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1–2), 71–96.
78.
JinY.ZhangL. J. (2018). The dimensions of foreign language classroom enjoyment and their effect on foreign language achievement. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(7), 948–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1526253
79.
JohnsT. (1991). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. English Language Research Journal, 4, 27–45.
80.
JohnsT. (1997). Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In WichmannA.FligelstoneS.McEneryT.KnowlesG. (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp. 100–115). Longman.
81.
JonssonA.SvingbyG. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity, and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
82.
KammererY.GottschlingS.BråtenI. (2021). The role of Internet-specific justification beliefs in source evaluation and corroboration during web search on an unsettled socio-scientific issue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 342–378.
KangE. Y. (2022). The role of working memory in the effects of models as a written corrective strategy. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(4), 1725–1753. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0207
85.
KilgarriffA.MarcowitzF.SmithS.ThomasJ. (2015). Corpora and language learning with the Sketch Engine and SKELL. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 20(1), 61–80.
86.
KimM.KimS. (2020). Dynamic learner engagement in a wiki-enhanced writing course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 582–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09248-5
87.
KimM.LuX. (2024). L2 English speaking syntactic complexity: Data preprocessing issues, reliability of automated analysis, and the effects of proficiency, L1 background, and topic. The Modern Language Journal, 108(1), 270–296.
88.
KrashenS. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
89.
KrukM. (2018). Changes in foreign language anxiety: A classroom perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 31–57.
90.
KrukM.PawlakM.Elahi ShirvanM.TaherianT.YazdanmehrE. (2025). A longitudinal study of foreign language enjoyment and boredom: A latent growth curve modeling. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1007–1038.
91.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26.
92.
KyleK.CrossleyS.VerspoorM. (2021). Measuring longitudinal writing development using indices of syntactic complexity and sophistication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(4), 781–812.
93.
LawlessB.ChenY.-W. (2019). Developing a method of critical thematic analysis for qualitative communication inquiry. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(1), 92–106.
94.
LeeH.WarschauerM.LeeJ. H. (2019). The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 40(5), 721–753. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy012
95.
LeeH.WarschauerM.LeeJ. H. (2020). Toward the establishment of a data-driven learning model: Role of learner factors in corpus-based second language vocabulary learning. Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12634
96.
LeeP.LinH. (2019). The effect of the inductive and deductive data-driven learning (DDL) on vocabulary acquisition and retention. System, 81, 14–25.
97.
Lenko-SzymanskaA.BoultonA. (Eds.). (2015). Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning. John Benjamins.
LiC.PawlakM.KrukM. (2025). Achievement emotions and control-value appraisals in foreign language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2183961
100.
LiC.WeiL. (2023). Anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom in language learning amongst junior secondary students in rural China: How do they contribute to L2 achievement?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 93–108.
101.
LinM. H. (2016). Effects of corpus-aided language learning in the EFL grammar classroom: A case study of students’ learning attitudes and teachers’ perceptions in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 871–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.250
102.
LittleD. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 14–29.
103.
LiuT.GablasovaD. (2025). Data-driven learning of collocations by Chinese learners of English: A longitudinal perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(3), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2214605
104.
LiuY.MaS.ChenY. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1357936.
105.
LooiJ.BoultonA.HassanR.RigetP. N. (2025). Data-driven learning: A linguistically authentic complement to coursebooks for foreign language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 2148–2171. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12753
106.
MacIntyreP. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In YoungD. J. (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language teaching: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety class- room atmosphere (pp. 24–45). Mc Graw-Hill.
107.
MacIntyreP. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In GkonouC.DaubneyM.DewaeleJ.-M. (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Multilingual Matters.
108.
MierzwaE. (2018). The relationship between foreign language enjoyment and gender among secondary grammar school students. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 9(2), 117–135.
109.
MizumotoA.ChujoK. (2016). Who is data-driven learning for? Challenging the monolithic view of its relationship with learning styles. System, 61, 55–64.
110.
MonteiroK.KimY. (2020). The effect of input characteristics and individual differences on L2 comprehension of authentic and modified listening tasks. System, 94, Article 102336.
111.
MuftahM. (2023). Data-driven learning (DDL) activities: do they truly promote EFL students’ writing skills development?Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13179–13205.
112.
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142.
113.
O’KeeffeA. (2023). A theoretical rationale for the importance of patterning in language acquisition and the implications for data-driven learning. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.793
114.
O’KeeffeA.McCarthyM.CarterR. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
115.
ParrottW. G.HertelP. (1999). Research methods in cognition and emotion. In DalgleishT.PowerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 61–81). Wiley.
116.
PawlakM.KrukM.Elahi ShirvanM.TaherianT.KarimpourS. (2025). Dynamic reciprocal associations of AI-assisted L2 writing task emotions in data-driven learning: A dynamic structural equation modeling. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2498094
117.
PekrunR. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
118.
PekrunR.GoetzT.FrenzelA. C.BarchfeldP. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48.
119.
PengJ.WangZ. (2024). The predictive roles of enjoyment, anxiety, willingness to communicate on students’ performance in English public speaking classes. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(2), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0162
120.
Pérez-ParedesP. (2010). Appropriation and integration issues in corpus methods and mainstream language education. In HarrisT.Moreno JaénM. (Eds.), Corpus linguistics in language teaching (pp. 53–73). Peter Lang.
121.
Pérez-ParedesP. (2022). A systematic review of the uses and spread of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011–2015. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667832
122.
PhungL.NakamuraS.ReindersH. (2021). The effect of choice on affective engagement: Implications for task design. In HiverP.Al-HoorieA. H.MercerS. (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 163–181). Multilingual Matters.
123.
Pizarro MilianR. (2017). What’s for sale at Canadian universities? A mixed-methods analysis of promotional strategies. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(1), 53–74.
124.
PlonskyL.OswaldF. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
125.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
126.
RajabaleeB.SantallyM.RennieF. (2019). A study of the relationship between students’ engagement and their academic performances in an eLearning environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019882567
127.
ReeveJ.CheonS.JangH. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, Article 101899.
128.
RömerU. (2024). Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition vis-à-vis data-driven learning. TESOL Quarterly, 58(3), 1235–1245.
129.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
130.
SaeedakhtarA.BagerinM.AbdiR. (2020). The effect of hands-on and hands-off data-driven learning on low-intermediate learners’ verb-preposition collocations. System, 91, Article 102268.
131.
SaitoK.DewaeleJ.-M.AbeM.In’namiY. (2018). Motivation, emotion, learning experience, and second language comprehensibility development in classroom settings: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(3), 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12297
132.
SajediS. M. (2016). EFL learners’ anxiety and their language achievement. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 199–207.
133.
Salmani NodoushanM. A. (2015). Anxiety as it pertains to EFL writing ability and performance. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 59–68.
134.
SchmidtR. (2001). Attention. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
135.
ShaoK.PekrunR.MarshH. W.LodererK. (2020). Control-value appraisals, achievement emotions, and foreign language performance: A latent interaction analysis. Learning and Instruction, 69, Article 101356.
136.
SinclairJ. M. (Ed.). (2004). How to use corpora in language teaching. John Benjamins.
137.
SparksR. L.AlamerA. (2024). Language anxiety does not affect the growth of L2 reading achievement: The latent growth curve model approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 45, 467–488.
138.
SteyerR.SchmittM.EidM. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 389–408.
139.
SunP. P.ZhangL. J. (2024). Investigating the effects of Chinese university students’ online engagement on their EFL learning outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 747–757.
140.
SunX.HuG. (2023). Direct and indirect data-driven learning: An experimental study of hedging in an EFL writing class. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 660–688.
141.
TeimouriY.GoetzeJ.PlonskyL. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 363–387.
142.
TrevorsG. (2021). The roles of identity conflict, emotions, and threat in learning from refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 59(6), 1–16.
143.
WangH.XuL.LiJ. (2023). Connecting foreign language enjoyment and English proficiency levels: The mediating role of L2 motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1054657.
144.
WangX.YuS.JiangL. (2024). Understanding master’s students’ academic emotional experiences in thesis writing in EMI settings: A positive psychology perspective. System, 124, Article 103361.
145.
WangY.DerakhshanA.ZhangL. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 731721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
146.
WileyR.RappB. (2019). Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: Using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness. Aphasiology, 33, 1–30.
147.
XuJ.FengX. (2024). Mindsets, resilience and student engagement as predictors of L2 achievement among Chinese English learners: Insights from fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. System, 124(June), 103358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103358
148.
ZareJ.Aqajani DelavarK. (2024). Enhancing English learning materials with data-driven learning: A mixed-methods study of task motivation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(9), 4011–4027.
149.
ZareJ.KarimpourS. (2022). Classroom concordancing and second language motivational self-system: A data-driven learning approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841584
150.
ZareJ.KarimpourS.Aqajani DelavarK. (2022). The impact of concordancing on English learners’ foreign language anxiety and enjoyment: An application of data-driven learning. System, 109, Article 102891.
151.
ZareJ.KarimpourS.Aqajani DelavarK. (2023). Classroom concordancing and English academic lecture comprehension: An implication of data-driven learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 885–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1953081
152.
ZareJ.NoughabiM. A.Al-IssaA. (2024). The impact of data-driven learning form-focused tasks on learners’ task engagement: An intervention study. ReCALL, 36(3), 306–323.
153.
ZhangL. X.LiX. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World [Chinese 外语界], 4, 15–23.
154.
ZhangX. (2019). Foreign language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590
155.
ZhangZ.LiuT.LeeC. B. (2021). Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 98, Article 102478.
156.
ZhaoY.BuckinghamL.DongJ. (2026). Enhancing learners’ genre competence in proposal writing with data-driven learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2644505
157.
ZhaoY.DongJ. (2026). Tracing the diachronic effects of data-driven learning on lexical complexity in EFL learners’ argumentative writing. ReCALL. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344026100494
158.
ZhouS. A.HiverP.ZhengY. (2023). Modeling intra- and inter-individual changes in l2 classroom engagement. Applied Linguistics, 44(6), 1047–1076.
159.
ZouD.XieH.WangF. L. (2023). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 166–185.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
