The development and utilization of a diversity advisory board in an intervention to support social skill development for autistic transition-aged youth
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2025
The development and utilization of a diversity advisory board in an intervention to support social skill development for autistic transition-aged youth
Recent discourse has identified significant issues surrounding the lack of diversity in autism-related research. However, recent efforts have called for the regular use of diversity advisory boards (DAB) in autism-related research to improve the inclusivity of underrepresented and marginalized groups included in the growing autism scholarship. This article outlines the development and implementation of a DAB to support the design and evaluation of an innovative intervention, WorkChat: A Virtual Workday. Specifically, WorkChat focuses on improving knowledge and practicing conversational skills with virtual customers, coworkers, and supervisors to support workplace interactions for autistic transition-age youth. Here, we share guidelines for developing, utilizing, and maintaining a DAB, as well as recommended practices and future implications for implementing DABs in autism services research while using the WorkChat DAB as a case study. The goal is to support the further use of DABs as a means of significantly improving the inclusion of underrepresented and marginalized identities including racial, gender, and sexual minorities, and individuals with disabilities in autism services research.
Lay Abstract
Autism research often does not include enough people with different identities such as different races, genders, and sexualities. Sometimes, support for autistic individuals does not help everyone equally. They often work better for white, straight autistic males. This article will talk about how we are trying to make autism research more diverse. We will share how we are using a group of diverse advisors to help with research. We will also talk about how to use these advisor groups in the future for autism research.
AnnammaS. (2016). Disrupting the carceral state through education journey mapping. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(9), 1210–1230.
2.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.
3.
AnnammaS. A.FerriB. A.ConnorD. J. (2018). Disability critical race theory: Exploring the intersectional lineage, emergence, and potential futures of DisCrit in education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 46–71.
4.
Baker-EriczénM. J.ElShamyR.KammesR. R. (2022). Current status of evidence-based practices to enhance employment outcomes for transition age youth and adults on the autism spectrum. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01327-2
BenoitC.JanssonM.MillarA.PhillipsR. (2005). Community-academic research on hard-to-reach populations: Benefits and challenges. Qualitative Health Research, 15(2), 263–282.
7.
Brookman-FrazeeL.StahmerA. C.LewisK.FederJ. D.ReedS. (2012). Building a research-community collaborative to improve community care for infants and toddlers at-risk for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(6), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21501
8.
BuchananN. T.WiklundL. O. (2021). Intersectionality research in psychological science: Resisting the tendency to disconnect, dilute, and depoliticize. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(1), 25–31.
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, May16). Key findings: Estimated number of adults living with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the United States, 2017.
ChunJ.KuoH. J.CurtissS. L.LeeG. K.LeeH.AwaduJ. (2023). The interplay of supports and barriers during the transition to adulthood for youth on the autism spectrum. Disability and Rehabilitation, 45(18), 2879–2889. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2112097
12.
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee, Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. (2011). Principles of community engagement. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
13.
ColeE. R.DuncanL. E. (2023). Better policy interventions through intersectionality. Social Issues and Policy Review, 17(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12090
14.
ConnorA.SungC.StrainA.ZengS.FabriziS. (2020). Building skills, confidence, and wellness: Psychosocial effects of soft skills training for young adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 2064–2076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03962-w
15.
ConnorsE.SeloveR.CanedoJ.SandersonM.HullP.AdamsM.McDermottI.BarlowC.Johns-PorterD.McAfeeC.GilliamK.MillerO.CoxN.FaddenM. K.KingS.TindleH. (2019). Improving community advisory board engagement in precision medicine research to reduce health disparities. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 12(6), 80–94.
16.
CramerM. E.LazoritzS.ShafferK.PalmD.FordA. L. (2018). Community advisory board members’ perspectives regarding opportunities and challenges of research collaboration. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40(7), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945917697229
17.
DavenportM.MazurekM.BrownA.McCollomE. (2018). A systematic review of cultural considerations and adaptation of social skills interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 52, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.05.003
18.
DavisA. M.SmithE.YangX.WrightR. (2024). Exploring racial discrimination, disability discrimination, and perception of the future among black-identifying emerging adults with and without autism in the United States: A mixed-methods descriptive study. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 17, 1019–1034.
19.
DrahotaA.MezaR. D.BrikhoB.NaafM.EstabilloJ. A.GomezE. D.VejnoskaS. F.DufekS.StahmerA. C.AaronsG. A. (2016). Community-academic partnerships: A systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(1), 163–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12184
20.
EilenbergJ. S.PaffM.HarrisonA. J.LongK. A. (2019). Disparities based on race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status over the transition to adulthood among adolescents and young adults on the autism spectrum: A systematic review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(5), 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1016-1
21.
ElsabbaghM.YusufA.PrasannaS.Shikako-ThomasK.RuffC. A.FehlingsM. G. (2014). Community engagement and knowledge translation: Progress and challenge in autism research. Autism, 18(7), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314546561
22.
GarlandA. F.PlemmonsD.KoontzL. (2006). Research–practice partnership in mental health: Lessons from participants. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0062-2
23.
GirolamoT.GhaliS.EigstiI.-M. (2023). A community-based approach to longitudinal language research with racially and ethnically minoritized autistic young adults: Lessons learned and new directions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(3), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00341
24.
HarmuthE.SillettaE.BaileyA.AdamsT.BeckC.BarbicS. P. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to employment for adults with autism: A scoping review. Annals of International Occupational Therapy, 1(1), 31–40.
25.
HennessyA.NicholsE. S.Al-SaoudS.Brossard-RacineM.DuerdenE. G. (2024). Identifying cognitive profiles in children with neurodevelopmental disorders using online cognitive testing. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29(2), 591–607.
26.
HiggenS.MuellerJ. T.MöskoM. (2022). Review: Universal mental health interventions for young students in adverse environments – a systematic review of evaluated interventions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12493
27.
HohmannA. A.ParronD. L. (1996). How the new NIH guidelines on inclusion of women and minorities apply: Efficacy trials, effectiveness trials, and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(5), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.5.851
28.
IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.BeckerA. B. (1998). REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
29.
JonesD. R.MandellD. S. (2020). To address racial disparities in autism research, we must think globally, act locally. Autism, 24(7), 1587–1589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320948313
30.
JonesD. R.NicolaidisC.EllwoodL. J.GarciaA.JohnsonK. R.LopezK.WaismanT. C. (2020). An expert discussion on structural racism in autism research and practice. Autism in Adulthood, 2(4), 273–281.
31.
KeyK. D.Furr-HoldenD.LewisE. Y.CunninghamR.ZimmermanM. A.Johnson-LawrenceV.SeligS. (2019). The continuum of community engagement in research: A roadmap for understanding and assessing progress. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 13(4), 427–434.
32.
LeeG. K.ChunJ.HamaH.CarterE. W. (2018). Review of transition and vocational interventions for youth and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0138-4
33.
LovelaceT. S.ComisM. P.TabbJ. M.OshokoyaO. E. (2021). Missing from the narrative: A seven-decade scoping review of the inclusion of black autistic women and girls in autism research. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00654-9
34.
LugerT. M.HamiltonA. B.TrueG. (2020). Measuring community-engaged research contexts, processes, and outcomes: A mapping review. The Milbank Quarterly, 98(2), 493–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12458
35.
MachalicekW.GlugatchL.ErturkB.BraffordT.KunzeM.DrewC.DouglasA.StorieS.CroweR.MagañaS. (2022). Recommendations for diversifying racial and ethnic representation in autism intervention research: A crossover review of recruitment and retention practices in pediatric mental health. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(21), 6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216468
36.
MaloneK. M.PearsonJ. N.PalazzoK. N.MannsL. D.RiveraA. Q.Mason MartinD. L. (2022). The scholarly neglect of black autistic adults in autism research. Autism in Adulthood: Challenges and Management, 4(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/AUT.2021.0086
37.
MayeM.BoydB. A.Martínez-PedrazaF.HalladayA.ThurmA.MandellD. S. (2022). Biases, barriers, and possible solutions: Steps towards addressing autism researchers under-engagement with racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse communities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(9), 4206–4211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05250-y
38.
McKnight-LizotteM. (2018). Work-related communication barriers for individuals with autism: A pilot qualitative study. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 24(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrc.2018.4
39.
MitchellJ.PerryT.Johnson-LawrenceV.RoraiV. (2020). Building and sustaining a community advisory board of African American older adults for volunteer research. Innovation in Aging, 4(Suppl. 1), 844. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3096
40.
NatlandS.HansenR. (2017). Conflicts and empowerment—A processual perspective on the development of a partnership. European Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 497–508.
41.
NewmanS. D.AndrewsJ. O.MagwoodG. S.JenkinsC.CoxM. J.WilliamsonD. C. (2011). Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: A synthesis of best processes. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8(3), A70.
42.
NicolaidisC.RaymakerD.McDonaldK.DernS.AshkenazyE.BoisclairC.RobertsonS.BaggsA. (2011). Collaboration strategies in nontraditional community-based participatory research partnerships: Lessons from an academic–community partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 5(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.1353/CPR.2011.0022
43.
OstranderN.Chapin-HogueS. (2011). Learning from our mistakes: An autopsy of an unsuccessful university–community collaboration. Social Work Education, 30(04), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.504768
44.
RouxA. M.VoltaireS.SteinbergH.WilliamsE.-D.AndersonK. A.HutsonT. M.SheaL. L. (2024). More than just a variable: The need to explicitly focus on black youth within autism transitions research. Autism in Adulthood, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2023.0041
45.
SchallC.WehmanP.AvelloneL.TaylorJ. P. (2020). Competitive integrated employment for youth and adults with autism: Findings from a scoping review. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29(2), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2019.12.001
46.
ScottM.MilbournB.FalkmerM.BlackM.BӧlteS.HalladayA.LernerM.TaylorJ. L.GirdlerS. (2019). Factors impacting employment for people with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review. Autism, 23(4), 869–901.
47.
SmithM. J.MerleJ. L.Baker-EriczénM.SherwoodK.BornheimerL. A.RossB.HarringtonM.SharmaA.BrownC.GordonT. (TJ)TelferD.ReeseJ.HirstJ.OulveyE. A.DignadiceV.WilliamsE.-D.MagañaS.HumeK.SungC.SmithJ. D. (2024). A Type 1 Hybrid Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol for Evaluating Virtual Interview Training Among Autistic Transition-Age Youth. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 42, 101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101384
48.
SmithL.PhillipsonL. (2021). Thinking through participatory action research with people with late-stage dementia: Research note on mistakes, creative methods and partnerships. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 775–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1810997
49.
SmithM. J.SherwoodK.BlajeskiS.RossB.SmithJ. D.JordanN.DawaltL.BishopL.AtkinsM. S. (2021). Job interview and vocational outcomes among transition-age youth receiving special education pre-employment transition services. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(5), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.5.405
50.
SmithM. J.SherwoodK.SungC.WilliamsE.-D.RossB.SharmaS.SharmaA.HarringtonM.BrownC.TelferD.BondJ.TodaS.KearonD.MorrowS.LovelaceT.DababnahS.KattariS. K.MagañaS.WatkinsT.SteacyC. (2023). Enhancing pre-employment transition services: A type 1 hybrid randomized controlled trial protocol for evaluating WorkChat: A Virtual Workday among autistic transition-age youth. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 34, 101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101153
51.
SolomonC. (2020). Autism and employment: Implications for employers and adults with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 4209–4217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04537-w
52.
StahmerA. C.VejnoskaS.IadarolaS.StraitonD.SegoviaF. R.LuelmoP.MorganE. H.LeeH. S.JavedA.BronsteinB.HochheimerS.ChoE.AranbarriA.MandellD.HassrickE. M.SmithT.KasariC. (2019). Correction to: Caregiver voices: Cross-cultural input on improving access to autism services. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 6(4), 774.
53.
SteinbrennerJ. R.McIntyreN.RentschlerL. F.PearsonJ. N.LuelmoP.JaramilloM. E.BoydB. A.WongC.NowellS. W.OdomS. L.HumeK. A. (2022). Patterns in reporting and participant inclusion related to race and ethnicity in autism intervention literature: Data from a large-scale systematic review of evidence-based practices. Autism, 26(8), 2026–2040. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211072593
54.
Suarez-BalcazarY.FranciscoV. T.Rubén ChávezN. (2020). Applying community-based participatory approaches to addressing health disparities and promoting health equity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(3–4), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/AJCP.12487
55.
SyedN. Y.MellonL.KristiansenS. (2023). Chapter 3—Equity, diversity, inclusion, and accessibility in research*. In CoxD. J.SyedN. Y.BrodheadM. T.QuigleyS. P. (Eds.), Research Ethics in Behavior Analysis (pp. 63–86). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90969-3.00012-8
56.
ValantineH. A.LundP. K.GammieA. E. (2016). From the NIH: A systems approach to increasing the diversity of the biomedical research workforce. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0138
57.
WalshE.HollowayJ.LydonH. (2018). An evaluation of a social skills intervention for adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and intellectual disabilities preparing for employment in Ireland: A pilot study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(5), 1727–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3441-5
58.
WeitlaufA. S.MiceliA.VehornA.DadaY.PinnockT.HarrisJ. W.HineJ.WarrenZ. (2023). Screening, diagnosis, and intervention for autism: Experiences of Black and multiracial families seeking care. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54(3), 931–942.
59.
WestE. A.TraversJ. C.KemperT. D.LibertyL. M.CoteD. L.McCollowM. M.Stansberry BrusnahanL. L. (2016). Racial and ethnic diversity of participants in research supporting evidence-based practices for learners with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 50(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916632495
60.
WhittenburgH. N.XuY.ThomaC. A.SchallC.HamW. (2023). Effects of behavioral skills training with video modeling and in situ training on workplace conversational skills of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 38(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221127971
61.
WilliamsE. D. G.SmithM. J.BoydB. (2022). Perspective: The role of diversity advisory boards in autism research. Autism, 27(3), 864–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221133633
62.
YuanN. P.MayerB. M.JoshweseomaL.ClicheeD.Teufel-ShoneN. I. (2020). Development of guidelines to improve the effectiveness of community advisory boards in health research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 14(2), 259–269.
