This article examines the daily strategizing of buyers, taking the dyad to be the elementary unit of analysis in market dynamics. The ideas are revisited that dyadic market relationships converge towards loyalty (Kirman and Vriend), and that markets tend towards social or institutional stabilization over time (Zuckerman). The phenomenon investigated is that although individuals strategize in each dyad in non-conformist ways, the stability of the market is nevertheless preserved. The empirical setting for these investigations was the Paris-Rungis market in France, one of the world’s largest wholesale markets for fresh products. Data collected through observations and interviews were coded, and a theoretical model was built on the analysis of these data. Among the main findings are that buyers’ recurrent deviance from dyadic rules maintains some level of instability, and that both sellers and market regulators exert opposing forces towards market restabilization through different modes of action.
Abbott, A. ( 1984) ‘Event Sequence and Event Duration: Colligation and Measurement’, Historical Methods17(4): 192-204.
2.
Baker, W.E. ( 1984) ‘The Social Structure of a National Securities Market’ , American Journal of Sociology89(4): 775-811.
3.
Baker, W.E., Faulkner, R.R. and Fisher, G.A. ( 1998) ‘Hazards of the Market: The Continuity and Dissolution of Interorganizational Market Relationships’, American Sociological Review63(2): 147-77.
4.
Benjamin, B.A. and Podolny, J.M. ( 1999) ‘Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry’, Administrative Science Quarterly44(3): 563-89.
5.
Bestor, T.C. ( 2004) Tsukiji: The Fish Market at the Center of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Callon, M. ( 2007) ‘What Does it Mean to Say that Economics is Performative?’ , in D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa and L. Siu (eds) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, pp. 311-57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Carlton, D.W. ( 1987) ‘The Theory and the Facts of How Markets Clear: Is Industrial Organization Valuable for Understanding Macroeconomics?’, NBER Working Paper 2178, National Bureau of Economic Research .
8.
Carlton, D.W. ( 1991) ‘The Theory of Allocation and its Implications for Marketing and Industrial Structure: Why Rationing is Efficient’, Journal of Law and Economics34(2): 231-62.
9.
Crozier, M. ( 1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Fichman, M. and Levinthal, D.A. ( 1991) ‘Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships’ , Academy of Management Review16(2): 442-68.
11.
Fligstein, N. ( 1996) ‘Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions’, American Sociological Review61(4): 656-73.
12.
Fligstein, N. ( 2001) ‘Markets as Institutions’, in N. Fligstein (ed.) The Architecture of Markets , pp. 27-44. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Geertz, C. ( 1978) ‘The Bazaar Economy: Information and Search in Peasant Marketing’, American Economic Review68(2): 28-32.
14.
Granovetter, M. ( 1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481-510.
15.
Greif, A. ( 1993) ‘Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition’, American Economic Review83(3): 525-548.
16.
Gulati, R. and Sytch, M. ( 2007) ‘Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer’s Performance in Procurement Relationships’, Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 32-69.
17.
Kirman, A. and Vriend, N.J. ( 2000) ‘Learning to Be Loyal: A Study of the Marseille Fish Market’, in D. D. Gatti, M. Gallegati and A. Kirman (eds) Interaction and Market Structure: Essays on Heterogeneity in Economics, pp. 33-56. Berlin: Springer .
18.
Kirman, A.P. and Vriend, N.J. ( 2001) ‘Evolving Market Structure: An ACE Model of Price Dispersion and Loyalty’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control25(3-4): 459-502.
19.
Kirman, A., Schulz, R., Härdle, W. and Werwatz, A. ( 2005) ‘Transactions that Did not Happen and their Influence on Prices’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization56(4): 567-91.
20.
Langley, A. ( 1999) ‘Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data’ , Academy of Management Review24(4): 691-710.
21.
Levinthal, D.A. and Fichman, M. ( 1988) ‘Dynamics of Interorganizational Attachments: Auditor-Client Relationships’, Administrative Science Quarterly33(3): 345-69.
22.
MacKenzie, D. and Millo, Y. ( 2003) ‘Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange’, American Journal of Sociology109(1): 107-45.
23.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. ( 1995) ‘An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust’ , Academy of Management Review20(3): 709-34.
24.
Nickerson, J.A., Silverman, B.S. and Zenger, T.R. ( 2007) ‘The "Problem" of Creating and Capturing Value’ , Strategic Organization5(3): 211-25.
25.
Podolny, J.M. ( 1993) ‘A Status-Based Model of Market Competition’ , American Journal of Sociology98(4): 829-72.
26.
Pratt, M.G. ( 2009) ‘For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research’, Academy of Management Journal52(5): 856-62.
27.
Rangan, S. ( 2000) ‘The Problem of Search and Deliberation in Economic Action: When Social Networks Really Matter’, Academy of Management Review25(4): 813-28.
28.
Rao, H., Davis, G.F. and Ward, A. ( 2000) ‘Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility: Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange’, Administrative Science Quarterly45(2): 268-92.
29.
Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. ( 2003) ‘Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range’, Administrative Science Quarterly48(2): 240-67.
30.
Rowley, T.J., Greve, H.R., Rao, H., Baum, J.A.C. and Shipilov, A.V. ( 2005) ‘Time to Break up: Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques’, Academy of Management Journal48(3): 499-520.
31.
Seabright, M.A., Levinthal, D.A. and Fichman, M. ( 1992) ‘Role of Individual Attachments in the Dissolution of Interorganizational Relationships’, Academy of Management Journal35(1): 122-60.
32.
Siggelkow, N. ( 2007) ‘Persuasion with Case Studies’, Academy of Management Journal50(1): 20-4.
33.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. ( 1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Uzzi, B. ( 1996) ‘The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect’, American Sociological Review61(4): 674-98.
35.
Uzzi, B. ( 1997) ‘Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly42(1): 35-67.
36.
Uzzi, B. and Lancaster, R. ( 2004) ‘Embeddedness and Price Formation in the Corporate Law Market’, American Sociological Review69(3): 319-44.
37.
Weisbuch, G., Kirman, A. and Herreiner, D. ( 2000) ‘Market Organisation and Trading Relationships’ , Economic Journal110(463): 411-36.
38.
White, H.C. ( 1981a) ‘Where do Markets Come from?’, American Journal of Sociology87(3): 517-47.
39.
White, H.C. ( 1981b) ‘Production Markets as Induced Role Structures’ , Sociological Methodology12: 1-57.
40.
Whittington, R. ( 2003) ‘The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective’, Strategic Organization1(1): 117-25.
41.
Zajac, E.J. and Westphal, J.D. ( 2004) ‘The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions’, American Sociological Review69(3): 433-57.
42.
Zbaracki, M.J. ( 2007) ‘A Sociological View of Costs of Price Adjustment: Contributions from Grounded Theory Methods’, Managerial and Decision Economics28(6): 553-67.
43.
Zuckerman, E.W. ( 2004) ‘Structural Incoherence and Stock Market Activity’ , American Sociological Review69(3): 405-32.
44.
Zuckerman, E.W. ( 2005) ‘Typecasting and Generalism in Firm and Market: Genre-Based Career Concentration in the Feature Film Industry, 1935-1995’ , in C. Jones and P. H. Thornton (eds) Transformation in Cultural Industries, pp. 173-216. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
45.
Zuckerman, E.W. and Kim, T.-Y. ( 2003) ‘The Critical Trade-off: Identity Assignment and Box-Office Success in the Feature Film Industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change12(1): 27-67.
