Discourse Communities and the Discourse of Experience

Abstract

Discourse communities are groups of people who share common ideologies, and common ways of speaking about things. They can be sharply or loosely defined. We are each members of multiple discourse communities. Discourse can colonize the members of discourse communities, taking over domains of thought by means of ideology.

The development of new discourse communities can serve positive ends, but discourse communities create risks as well. In our own work on the narratives of people with interests in health care, for example, we find that patients speak of their illness experiences as victims of circumstance; policy makers construct adverse experiences and challenges as opportunities to be taken; health care workers speak from a mixed perspective, seeing themselves as both victims and opportunists depending on context. To be trapped within the discourse of a particular community is to put at risk the ability to communicate across discourses. Membership of a discourse community can impair the habit of critique, and deny opportunities for heteroglossic discourse. Privileging critique as a mode of discourse perhaps might define the ethical community, suggesting that ethical community may be an antidote to the constraining effects of conventional discourse community.

Keywords

discourse discourse community ethical community experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annandale, E. (1998). The sociology of health and medicine: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Arrow, K. , Mnookin, R.H. , Ross, L. , Tversky, A. and Wilson, R. , Eds. (1995). Barriers to conflict resolution. New York: WW Norton and Co.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Campbell, J. (1973 [1949]). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Carnocham, W.B. (1992). The battleground of the curriculum. London: Macmillan Press.

Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber.

Frank, A.W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body illness and ethics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

11.

Hammond, K.R. (1996). Human judgement and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Hastrup, K. (1995). A passage to anthropology: Between experience and theory. London and New York: Routledge.

13.

Illich, I. (1975). Medical nemesis: The expropriation of health. London: Lothian Publishing.

14.

Jordens, C.F.C. , Little, M. , Paul, K. and Sayers E.-J. (2001). Life disruption and generic complexity: A social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 53(9), 1227–1236.

15.

Little, M. (1995). Humane medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. , Montgomery K. and Philipson, B. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 47(10), 1485–1494.

17.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. and Sayers, E.-J. (2001). Surviving survival: Life after cancer. Marrickville: Choice Books.

18.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. and Sayers, E.-J. (2002). Survivorship and discourses of identity. Psycho-Oncology, 11(2), 170–178.

19.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. , Sayers, E.-J. , Cruickshank, J. A. , Stegeman, J. et al. (2002). Discourse in different voices: Reconciling n = 1 and n = many. Social Science & Medicine, 55(7), 1079–1087.

20.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. , Sayers, E.-J. and Sriskandarajah, D. (1999a). Approval and disapproval in the narratives of patients with colorectal cancer and their carers. Health, 3(4), 451–467.

21.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. , Sayers, E.-J. and Sriskandarajah, D. (1999b). The illness trajectory or the illness journey. What’s in a metaphor? MEDIC (Italy), 7(1), 41–48.

22.

Little, M. , Jordens, C.F.C. , Paul, K. , Sayers, E.-J. and Sriskandarajah, D. (2000). Face, honor and dignity in the context of colon cancer. Journal of Medical Humanities, 21(4), 229–243.

23.

Little, M. , Paul, K. , Jordens, C.F.C. and Sayers, E.-J. (2000). Vulnerability in the narratives of patients and their carers – studies of colorectal cancer. health:, 4(4), 499–514.

24.

Lock, M. (2001). Introduction. health:, 5(3), 283–291.

25.

Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Morris, P. (1996). Community beyond tradition. In P. Heelas , S. Lash and P. Morris , Detraditionalization, pp. 238–245 Oxford: Blackwell.

27.

Moynihan, R. (1998). Too much medicine? The business of health and the risks for you. Sydney: ABC Books.

28.

National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders from Their Families (1997). Bringing them home. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 689-689.

29.

Nelson, H.L. (2001). Damaged identities, narrative repair. New York: Cornell University Press.

30.

Robertson, A. (2001). Biotechnology, political rationality and discourses on health risk. health:, 5(3), 293–309.

31.

Scott, J.W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773–797.

32.

Warren, M.A. (1997). Moral status: Obligations to persons and other living things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

Williams, R. (1988). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.