Conceptualizing autonomy in the context of chronic physical illness: relating philosophical theories to social scientific perspectives

Abstract

The aim of this article is to conceptualize autonomy in the context of chronic physical illness. To this end, we compare and contrast a selection of contemporary philosophical theories of autonomy with social scientific perspectives on chronic illness, particularly models of disability and symbolic interactionism. The philosophical theories mainly depart from a positive conceptualization of autonomy, which involves actively shaping one's life and identifying with fundamental values. This conceptualization is preferred over a negative conceptualization, which defines autonomy as non-interference, for its compatibility with social models of disability and with the assumption that people are interdependent. Interference may disable, but also enable people with a chronic illness to shape their lives. What matters is that people can realize what they want to realize. We suggest that, in the context of chronic physical illness, autonomy might be conceptualized as correspondence between what people want their lives to be like and what their lives are actually like. Disturbed autonomy might be restored either by expanding opportunities to arrange life or by adjusting how one wants life to be arranged. The grounds for the latter approach might be questioned, first, if people have not adjusted what they want carefully, and second, if reorganization of the material and social environment would have made it unnecessary to adjust one's arrangement of life.

Keywords

autonomy chronic illness conceptualization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agich, G.J. (1993). Autonomy and long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.

Aveyard, H. (2000). Is there a concept of autonomy that can usefully inform nursing practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 352-8.

Ballou, K.A. (1998). A concept analysis of autonomy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 14(2), 102-10.

Baltes, M.M. (1996). The many faces of dependency in old age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, C. , Mercer, G. and Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction . Cambridge: Polity Press.

Becker, G. (1994). The oldest-old: Autonomy in the face of frailty . Journal of Aging Studies, 8(1), 59-76.

Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Bickenbach, J.E. , Chatterji, S. , Badley, E.M. and Üstün, T.B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48(9), 1173-87.

Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167-82.

10.

Charmaz, K. (1995). The body, identity and self: Adapting to impairment . Sociological Quarterly, 36(4), 657-80.

11.

Collopy, B.J. (1988). Autonomy in long term care: Some crucial distinctions . The Gerontologist, 28(Supplement), 10-17.

12.

Corbin, J. and Strauss, A.L. (1988). Unending work and care: Managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

13.

Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Dworkin, G. (1989). The concept of autonomy. In J. Christman (Ed.), The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy, pp. 54-62. New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to self: The moral limits of the criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.

16.

Frank, A.W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

17.

Frankfurt, H.G. (1989). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person . In J. Christman (Ed.), The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy, pp. 63-76, New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Friedman, M. (2000). Autonomy, social disruption, and women. In C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self, pp. 35-51. New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Gignac, M.A.M. and Cott, C. (1998). A conceptual model of independence and dependence for adults with chronic physical illness and disability. Social Science & Medicine, 47(6), 739-53.

20.

Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In S. Hall , D. Held and T. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures, pp. 274-316. Cambridge: Polity Press.

21.

Hertz, J.E. (1996). Conceptualization of perceived enactment of autonomy in the elderly. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 17(3), 261-73.

22.

Hickey, T. and Stilwell, D.L. (1992). Chronic illness and aging: A personal-contextual model of age-related-changes in health-status. Educational Gerontology, 18(1), 1-15.

23.

Keenan, J. (1999). A concept analysis of autonomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(3), 556-62.

24.

Mackenzie, C. (2000). Imagining oneself otherwise. In C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self, pp. 124-50. New York: Oxford University Press.

25.

Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000a). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.

26.

Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (2000b). Introduction: Autonomy refigured. In C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self, pp. 3-31. New York: Oxford University Press.

27.

McWilliam, C.L. , Brown, J.B. , Carmichael, J.L. and Lehman, J.M. (1994). A new perspective on threatened autonomy in elderly persons: The disempowering process. Social Science & Medicine , 38(2), 327-38.

28.

Proot, I.M. , Crebolder, H.F.J.M. , Huijer Abu-Saad, H. and Ter Meulen, R.H.J. (1998). Autonomy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes: A concept analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 12(3), 139-45.

29.

Rybarczyk, B. , Gallagher-Thompson, D. , Rodman, J. , Zeiss, A. , Gantz, F.E. and Yesavage, J. (1992). Applying cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy to the chronically ill elderly: Treatment issues and case illustration. International Psychogeriatrics, 4(1), 127-40.

30.

Seidman, S. (1992). Postmodern social theory as narrative with a moral intent. In S. Seidman and D.G. Wagner (Eds.), Postmodernism and social theory: The debate over general theory, pp. 101-36. Cambridge : Blackwell Publishers.

31.

Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge .

32.

Verbrugge, L.M. and Jette, A.M. (1994). The Disablement Process. Social Science & Medicine, 38(1), 1-14.

33.

WHO. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health - ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization .

34.

Widdershoven, G.A.M. (1999). Care, cure and interpersonal understanding. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(5), 1163-9.

35.

Williams, G.C. , Freedman, Z.R. and Deci, E.L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 21(10), 1644-51.

36.

Williams, G.H. and Wood, P.H.N. (1988). Coming to terms with chronic illness: The negotiation of autonomy in rheumatoid arthritis. International Disability Studies, 10(3), 128-33.