A challenge has emerged to Bury's (1982) conceptualization of chronic illness as biographical disruption. The idea that certain life circumstances — notably older age or the presence of significant health and social problems — render the experience of chronic illness biographically `continuous' or `reinforcing' has gained currency in the social study of chronic illness.
This article draws from a qualitative study with women diagnosed with cancer in their 70s or 80s. Respondents' narratives suggest that a long life, especially a life characterized by struggle, does provide a context for the assessment of cancer as non-disruptive. However, the study offers evidence that a long life characterized by sufficiency may also be associated with an assessment of cancer as non-disruptive, and that older age and hardship sometimes render chronic illness especially problematic.
Centrally, the article examines respondents' oft-cited commitment to avoid `dwelling' on illness, highlighting how broad cultural and moral discourses, patterns of social interaction and structures of power combine to foreclose older women's accounts of disruption.
Bazeley, P. and Richards, L. (2000). NVivo qualitative project book. London: SAGE.
2.
Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167-82.
3.
Bury, M. (1988). Meaning at risk: The experience of arthritis. In M. Bury and R. Anderson (Eds.), Living with chronic illness: The experience of patients and their families, pp. 89-116. London: Unwin Hyman.
4.
Bury, M. (1991). The sociology of chronic illness: A review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health & Illness , 13(4), 451-68.
5.
Bury, M. (2001). Illness narratives: Fact or fiction? Sociology of Health & Illness, 23(3), 263-85.
6.
Carricaburu, D. and Pierret, J. (1995). From biographical disruption to biographical reinforcement: The case of HIV-positive men. Sociology of Health & Illness , 17(1), 65-88.
7.
Charles, N. and Walters, V. (1998). Age and gender in women's accounts of their health: Interviews with women in South Wales. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20(3), 331-50.
8.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Y.S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research, pp. 509-35. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
9.
Ciambrone, D. (2001). Illness and other assaults on self: The relative impact of HIV/AIDS on women's lives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 23(4), 517-40.
10.
Cornwell, J. (1984). Hard-earned lives: Accounts of health and illness from East London. London: Tavistock .
11.
Faircloth, C.A., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., Young, M.E. and Gubrium, J. (2004). Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(2), 242-61.
12.
Ganz, P.A., Schag, C.C. and Heinrich, R.L. (1985). The psychosocial impact of cancer on the elderly: A comparison with younger patients. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 33(6), 429-35.
13.
Gatenby, B. and Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research: Methodological and ethical issues. Women's Studies International Forum, 23(1), 89-105.
14.
Gould, J. (2005). Lower-income women with breast cancer: Interacting with cancer treatment and income security systems. Canadian Women's Studies, 24(1), 31-6.
15.
Jolanki, O. (2004). Moral argumentation in talk about health and old age. health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health , Illness and Medicine, 8(4), 483-503.
16.
Lawton, J. (2003). Lay experiences of health and illness: Past research and future agendas. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(3), 23-40.
17.
Macintyre, S. (1986). The patterning of health by social position in contemporary Britain: Directions for sociological research. Social Science and Medicine, 23(4), 393-415.
18.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London : SAGE.
19.
Pound, P., Gompertz, P. and Ebrahim, S. (1998). Illness in the context of older age: The case of stroke. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20(4), 489-506.
20.
Rubinstein, R., Kilbride, J. and Nagy, S. (1992). Elders living alone: Frailty and the perception of choice. New York: Aldine De Gruyter .
21.
Sanders, C., Donovan, J. and Dieppe, P. (2002). The significance and consequences of having painful and disabled joints in older age: Co-existing accounts of normal and disrupted biographies. Sociology of Health & Illness, 24(2), 227-53.
22.
Schulz, U. and Mohamed, N.E. (2004). Turning the tide: Benefit finding after cancer surgery. Social Science & Medicine, 59(3), 653-62.
23.
Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: SAGE.
24.
Sinding, C., Barnoff, L. and Grassau, P. (2004). Homophobia and heterosexism in cancer care: Lesbians' experiences. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36, 170-88.
25.
Sinding, C. and Gray, R. (2005). Active aging - spunky survivorship? Discourses and experiences of the years beyond breast cancer. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 147-61.
26.
Sinding, C., Wiernikowski, J. and Aronson, J. (2005). Cancer care from the perspectives of older women . Oncology Nursing Forum, 32(6), 1169-75.
27.
Statistics Canada. (1999). Low income cut-offs. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
28.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
29.
Tritter, J.Q. and Calnan, M. (2002). Cancer as a chronic illness? Reconsidering categorization and exploring experience. European Journal of Cancer Care , 11(3), 161-5.
30.
Werner, A., Isaksen, L.W. and Malterud, K. (2004). `I am not the kind of woman who complains of everything': Illness stories on self and shame in women with chronic pain. Social Science & Medicine, 59(5), 1035-45.
31.
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2000). Thinking differently about thinking positive: A discursive approach to cancer patients' talk. Social Science & Medicine, 50(6), 797-811.
32.
Williams, S.J. (2000). Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept . Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(1), 40-67.
