Abstract
This article describes a culturally sensitive questionnaire for the assessment of the effects of trauma in the Cambodian refugee population, the Cambodian Somatic Symptom and Syndrome Inventory (CSSI), and gives the results of a survey with the instrument. The survey examined the relationship of the CSSI, the two CSSI subscales, and the CSSI items to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity and self-perceived functioning. A total of 226 traumatized Cambodian refugees were assessed at a psychiatric clinic in Lowell, MA, USA. There was a high correlation of the CSSI, the CSSI somatic and syndrome scales, and all the CSSI items to the PTSD Checklist (PCL), a measure of PTSD severity. All the CSSI items varied greatly across three levels of PTSD severity, and patients with higher levels of PTSD had very high scores on certain CSSI-assessed somatic items such as dizziness, orthostatic dizziness (upon standing), and headache, and on certain CSSI-assessed cultural syndromes such as khyâl attacks, “fear of fainting and dying upon standing up,” and “thinking a lot.” The CSSI was more highly correlated than the PCL to self-perceived disability assessed by the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12). The study demonstrates that the somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes described by the CSSI form a central part of the Cambodian refugee trauma ontology. The survey indicates that locally salient somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes need be profiled to adequately assess the effects of trauma.
Keywords
Cross-cultural research indicates that many of the 17 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) items listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) are a core part of the universal response to trauma, some examples being nightmares, startle, and vivid unwanted recall of trauma events; other DSM-IV PTSD items seem to be a much less salient aspect of the trauma response in non-Western cultures, for example, amnesia or numbing (for a review, see Hinton & Lewis-Fernández, 2011). But many key symptoms and syndromes that are a central part of the trauma response in particular cultural contexts are not assessed in the PTSD criteria (de Jong & Reis, 2010; Henry, 2006; Jenkins & Valiente, 1994; Kleinman & Kleinman, 1994; Kohrt & Hruschka, 2010; Pedersen, Kienzler, & Gamarra, 2010). The Cambodian Somatic Symptom and Syndrome Inventory (CSSI) assesses somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes that are a key part of the response to trauma among Cambodian refugees but that are not among the DSM-IV PTSD symptoms.
Development of the CSSI
The first author is fluent in Cambodian, lived in Southeast Asia for three years doing doctoral research, and has been the medical director of a Southeast Asian clinic in Lowell, MA, USA, for over twelve years where he has done over 20 hours of clinical work each week with traumatized Cambodian speakers, all the while conducting ethnography-focused and mixed-method studies. Building on this work, we developed a list of somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes that were found to be clinically important in this group. An initial instrument was piloted and revised according to clinical utility. We have used this instrument, the Cambodian Somatic Symptom and Syndrome Inventory (CSSI), as a standard assessment tool at the clinic to guide treatment for over three years and have found that the symptoms of the CSSI were crucially important to patients and much more salient than many of the PTSD symptoms. All the items were easily understood by patients and have clear face validity in the cultural context.
Other authors have argued for the clinical utility and theoretical importance of such locally validated scales, but few examples exist. The scales that have been created tend to be generated by lists obtained from community leaders and other informants, and the specific items have not been studied, so that information on their “emic” aspect is lacking (Ebigbo, 1986; Kinzie et al., 1982; Phan, Steel, & Silove, 2004). 1 Scale items should be examined to illustrate why they are culturally salient and important. Otherwise, one is left with a list of items and no understanding of how each of the items relates to the local experiencing of trauma, how the symptom came to be generated, what it means for a person in that culture to have the symptom or syndrome, and how the complaint varies across social and cultural contexts.
In this paper, we describe the CSSI and its application to an outpatient clinic sample. In the first section, we discuss somatic symptoms and syndromes that are prominent among Cambodian refugees and how they are generated (Hinton, Hinton, Loeum, & Pollack, 2008). We then present results from a survey that investigates the CSSI’s relationship to PTSD severity and self-perceived functioning.
Cambodian Somatic Symptom and Syndrome Inventory (Cambodian CSSI)
Contents of the Cambodian Symptom and Syndrome Inventory (CSSI)
Somatic complaints assessed in the CSSI
The CSSI assesses the 18 somatic symptoms listed in Table 1. We have given detailed ethnographic description of these symptoms and the reasons for their cultural salience among Cambodian trauma victims in previous publications (for a review, see Hinton & Good, 2009; Hinton & Lewis-Fernández, 2010, 2011). Each of these culturally salient symptoms can be thought of as being generated by one or more of four key processes: (a) the biology of trauma, (b) local ethnophysiology/cultural syndromes, (c) metaphoric associations, and (d) trauma associations (Hinton, Hinton, et al., 2008). People in different cultures may endorse the same somatic symptoms, but the symptom meaning—and manner of symptom generation—may differ according to these four dimensions, and this may cause certain symptoms found in all traumatized groups to be more prominent in specific cultural groups. Below we examine how these four processes or dimensions make the symptoms in the CSSI salient for Cambodian patients. Similar approaches to the multidimensional analysis of somatic symptoms can be found in Barsky (1992), Good (1977), Hinton and Good (2009), Hinton, Howes, and Kirmayer (2008), Jenkins and Valiente (1994), Kirmayer (1996), Kirmayer and Sartorious (2007), and Kleinman and Kleinman (1994).
The biology of trauma
Many Cambodians experienced extreme and prolonged stress and trauma during the Pol Pot period and afterwards (Becker, 1998; Chandler, 1991). Stress and trauma can result in changes in the nervous system that produce a constant state of anxiety. This high state of physiological arousal can cause all the culturally salient somatic symptoms in the CSSI (Hinton & Otto, 2006): palpitations and shortness of breath from activation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), dizziness from ANS activation and anxiety effects on the balance system, neck soreness from muscle tension, and cold extremities from ANS-caused vasoconstriction.
Trauma not only results in a highly aroused state of the nervous system, with sympathetic nervous system activation and lowered vagal tone and control; it also increases arousability, that is, the tendency for anxiety and arousal to be rapidly induced by any of multiple causes ranging from sounds to emotions (Hinton, Nickerson, & Bryant, 2011). For example, when a trauma survivor worries about a problem such as the acting out behavior of a child or not having money to buy sufficient food, the easily activated ANS can cause a rapid increase of anxiety symptoms and the rapid induction of multiple somatic symptoms such as dizziness, palpitations, and neck soreness (Hinton et al., 2011). Trauma survivors tend to have reactivity to a variety of emotions other than just worry, including: anger, anxiety itself, stress, and even painful, nostalgic recall of the dead—in addition to the classic examples of noise-caused startle or trauma reminders, which are two types of reactivity listed among the DSM-IV PTSD symptoms.
By bringing about this combination of arousal and arousability, the psychobiology of trauma causes traumatized Cambodians to have extreme emotional states and multiple somatic symptoms such as those included in the CSSI. Cross-cultural differences in biology may also contribute to the salience of certain of the CSSI symptoms. Trauma causes biological effects that increase dizziness in general, dizziness on standing, and motion sickness 2 (Hinton, Hofmann, et al., 2010), and certain East and Southeast Asian populations such as Cambodian refugees may be particularly predisposed to these symptoms (Hinton & Good, 2009; Hinton, Hofmann, et al., 2010) or those of sleep paralysis (Hinton, Pich, Chhean, & Pollack, 2005).
Ethnophysiology-type cultural syndromes
The interpretation of somatic symptoms in terms of a khyâl attack: Correlated physiological state and feared consequence
Cultural syndrome- and ethnophysiology-caused hypervigilance towards somatic symptoms may increase awareness of these same somatic symptoms by attentional amplification, hence even a slight symptom like incipient dizziness may be perceived. The fear experienced upon noticing one of the feared symptoms, or even anticipating that it will occur in a certain situation (e.g., that standing up will cause dizziness, which is considered the key symptom of the onset of a dangerous “khyâl attack”) may induce a symptom as part of the physiology of fear. A vicious cycle of worsening then may ensue that leads to panic as fear worsens the symptom and the fear-worsened symptom causes yet more fear. Through this combination of attentional amplification and the physiology of fear, ethnophysiological concerns and cultural syndromes can lead to the worsening of symptoms associated with those ethnophysiologies and syndromes (on these sorts of escalating spirals, see also Kirmayer & Sartorius, 2007). Through these means, a Cambodian may experience escalating distress focused on a somatic symptom to the point of panic, such as a neck-focused or dizziness-focused panic attack centering on fears of the onset of a dangerous khyâl attack (Hinton, Um, & Ba, 2001b).
Metaphoric dimensions
Many of the CSSI somatic symptoms have important metaphoric dimensions in Khmer, the Cambodian language, that increase their cultural salience. In Khmer, multiple tropes describe distress in terms of spinning: “My son shakes me” (koun kreulôk khnyom), meaning “My son causes me great distress,” and “My brain is spinning” (wul khueu khabaal), meaning “I am overwhelmed.” Several Cambodian tropes involve neck soreness: “Arrived to my neck” (dâl gâ), meaning “I cannot take it any more,” and “Carrying a heavy load at the shoulder” (reek theunguen), meaning “I am overburdened with responsibility.” Owing to these metaphors, when a Cambodian thinks about a current problem it may bring about dizziness and neck soreness by a process that might be called metaphor-guided somatization. Symptoms may also activate the metaphor-network: if a Cambodian has dizziness or neck soreness for some reason, that symptom may evoke all the life issues encoded in memory by associated metaphors––in this way, such symptoms as dizziness on standing up or neck tension provoked by worry may bring to mind various problems such as conflicts with children or financial concerns. Metaphor-guided somatization and symptom-caused metaphor-network activation combine to cause certain somatic symptoms to be more prominent in the Cambodian cultural context (Hinton & Good, 2009; Hinton & Lewis-Fernández, 2010).
Trauma associations to somatic sensations
The symptoms on the CSSI are also salient among Cambodian refugees owing to trauma associations. Many Cambodian refugees experienced severe traumas in the past––e.g., during the Pol Pot period, observing a killing, being beaten, being threatened with death––that brought about somatic symptoms such as dizziness as a result of fear and activation of the ANS (Hinton, Hinton, et al., 2008). Some of these trauma events by their very nature tended to strongly induce certain somatic symptoms. Dizziness was induced by many traumas: performing slave labor while starving, which not uncommonly caused syncope, particularly when doing jobs like rice transplanting that involved repeatedly bending over; being struck in the head by the Khmer Rouge as a punishment; encountering corpses, which brought about nausea and dizziness; and having daily bouts of malaria attacks for months (endured by almost every Cambodian), during which extreme dizziness and other symptoms were experienced. The most common form of slave labor was carrying heavy loads of dirt balanced at the neck on a pole during dam building that produced severe neck soreness and discomfort; and the daily malarial episodes almost always induced strong neck soreness and headache (Hinton, Hsia, Park, Rasmussen, & Pollack, 2009).
If a Cambodian now experiences one of these trauma-linked somatic symptoms for any reason––e.g., dizziness that results from standing up or becoming anxious––the somatic symptom may bring to mind the trauma event that featured that somatic symptom, such as feeling dizzy upon witnessing an execution or doing slave labor, in what might be called somatic-symptom activation of the trauma memory network, and that somatic symptom may well worsen because trauma recall increases arousal which, in turn, increases the somatic symptom by physiological means or because recall of the trauma event that featured the somatic sensation causes a somatic flashback. The somatic symptom may begin with trauma recall: thinking about a trauma event (“I recall seeing someone killed” or “I remember being forced to do slave labor while starving”) may increase arousal and induce many somatic symptoms through the physiology of arousal, and thinking about a trauma event may result in somatic flashbacks and so induce somatic symptoms linked to the memory such as dizziness, that is, may cause the original trauma to be recalled with all its sensorial aspects (Hinton, Hinton, et al., 2008).
Cultural syndromes assessed in the CSSI
The CSSI also assesses cultural syndromes that are prominent aspects of the Cambodian response to trauma (see Table 1): somatic-focused syndromes (10 items): agoraphobia/motion-sickness-type syndromes (two items); emotion-focused syndrome (one item); a cognitive-deficit syndrome (one item); and spiritual-type syndromes (four items). We have given detailed ethnographic description of all of these syndromes in previous publications (for a review, see Hinton & Good, 2009; Hinton & Lewis-Fernández, 2010, 2011).
Somatic-focused syndromes (10 items)
One item assesses fear of khyâl attacks, which were described above. Khyâl, a wind-like substance, is thought to flow throughout the body alongside blood, but sometimes the normal flow of khyâl and blood suddenly becomes disturbed and khyâl and blood surge upward in the body toward the head, an event called a khyâl attack that may cause the somatic symptoms and disasters described in Table 2 (Hinton, Pich, et al., 2010). A particularly severe khyâl attack may be triggered by standing up that is referred to as “khyâl overload” (khyâl koeu) and is a greatly feared physiological disturbance (Hinton, Um, & Ba, 2001a). Other common causes of khyâl attacks are worry or any kind of anxiety or fright, for example, that brought about by a nightmare. The CSSI asks how much the person was bothered in the last month by khyâl attacks and by ethnophysiological concerns associated with khyâl attacks: having khyâl moving up from the stomach to the point of fearing death by asphyxia; neck soreness to the point of fearing the neck vessels would burst; fear of the death of the arms or legs; and standing up and feeling poorly to the point of fearing fainting and khyâl overload. Because each of these somatic complaints (e.g., neck soreness) not only involves culturally specific catastrophic cognitions but also particular trauma associations and metaphoric associations (e.g., trauma associations and metaphoric associations to neck sensations), we consider each of these a syndrome (e.g., the sore neck syndrome; Hinton et al., 2001b).
Another CSSI syndrome item is heart weakness. Cambodians worry that heart weakness will cause strong reactivity to various stimuli, for example, to sounds and to smells; that heart weakness predisposes to certain negative emotional states that include being easily frightened, becoming angry, and engaging in worry; and that heart weakness may cause heart arrest (Hinton, Hinton, Um, Chea, & Sak, 2002). Heart weakness is also thought to cause dizziness upon standing up, palpitations, and shortness of breath (the heart is considered to drive breathing by a piston-like action), and a weak heart is thought to pump blood and khyâl poorly, predisposing to having cold extremities and khyâl attacks. Cambodians attribute heart weakness to many causes, including poor sleep, poor appetite, and excessive worry.
The following are four other somatic-focused syndromes assessed by the CSSI. Cambodians worry that a thick saliva (viz., sleih, which we will translate as “sputum”) may rise up from the stomach and cause blocking of the breathing apparatus and the workings of the heart. 3 Cambodians also worry about having bouts of “inner hotness,” or kdaw khnong, a condition characterized by excessive bodily heat that results in thirst and a sense of heat rising in the chest. “Inner hotness” predisposes to anger, and may cause the blood to boil and so send a steam upward in the body to cause most of the symptoms and disasters described for a khyâl attack (Table 2). The CSSI also assesses whether the patient considered him- or herself to have been bothered by malaria-like attacks in the last month. As a unique form of anxiety, Cambodians frequently experience a malaria-like attack: rigors (i.e., a sense of great coldness in the body that provokes a dramatic shaking that may last 30 minutes or more), then a great heat in the body, and finally sweating that brings about relief. These attacks feature prominent panic symptoms like palpitations, dizziness, and neck pain. The CSSI also assesses “fear of being out of energy to the point that it may cause a khyâl attack or death.” Patients worry that the body will start to malfunction if depleted of energy and that this may cause death.
Agoraphobia/motion-sickness syndromes (two items)
“Car poisoning” (pul laan) is a khyâl attack caused by traveling in a car. Riding in a car is thought by Cambodian refugees to cause dizziness and khyâl attacks owing to the sudden starts and stops, the bumps, and the complex, shifting visual stimulation. “People poisoning” (pul meunuh) is a khyâl attack caused by going out into a public space such as into a mall or a crowded Buddhist temple. If a person is considered to be weak, these localities are thought to cause him or her to be dizzy owing to the experiencing of multiple sensory stimuli––auditory, olfactory, and visual (viz., the constant movement of people and an ever-changing visual array)––that come from several directions, that pull the attention to various localities, and that provoke a constant turning of the head as the person notices each stimulus, with that turning of the head further increasing dizziness. 4
Emotion-focused syndrome (two items)
An emotion-focused syndrome assessed in the CSSI is “toxique.” This indicates a state in which the person has engaged in worry and other anxious thoughts to the point of being irritable and potentially violent. The syndrome’s name is adopted from French colonial medicine and is related to that time period’s ideas about the biology of neurasthenia. The other emotion-focused syndrome in the CSSI is “thinking a lot” (kut caraeun), which describes an anxious mental state that has the following characteristics: one thinks of upsetting topics such as current problems (e.g., money problems and problems with children), past trauma events (e.g., those that occurred in the Pol Pot period), or separation from loved ones owing to their death or their living at a distance (e.g., often the parents and siblings of patients live in Cambodia); one has a hard time not thinking about these things; and one thinks about these things to the point that it is considered damaging, that is, the ruminations are depleting one’s mind and body, predisposing to heart weakness and khyâl attacks, and they are overheating the brain to the point that there may be permanent memory loss and a state of forgetfulness, even insanity. (Worry and “thinking a lot” episodes, along with standing up, are three of the most common causes of khyâl attacks.)
Cognitive-deficit syndrome (one item)
Phluc pheang literally means “forgetfulness/mental distraction” and refers to a mental state in which the person often forgets things, like having left a pot with boiling water on the stove to make rice. It is a mental state in which the person often floats off in thought to contemplate other things such as past traumas and current worries and so becomes oblivious to his or her current surroundings. This may happen at any time: when talking to someone or driving a car. It is feared that this mental state may progress to a permanent state of forgetfulness, even insanity. Cambodian Buddhism emphasizes focused attention, for example, attending to the breath in meditation, and this syndrome’s state of mental distraction is the opposite of that cultural ideal. Buddhism sensitizes Cambodians to the concept of the “wandering mind.”
Spiritual-type syndromes (four items)
One CSSI syndrome item assesses fear of having had the soul displaced from the body. Cambodians worry that the soul may be displaced by fear. Soul dislocation may cause prolonged illness, a feeling of bodily lightness, hyperreactivity to all stimuli (e.g., noises), and possibly death. The person who is prone to such dislocation uses the expression, “soul at the end of the hair” (prolung niw jong so), a condition having symptoms similar to soul loss itself. Various rituals may then be used to call the soul back to the body and secure it there. The CSSI also assesses fears that a spiritual object called an ampuu has been sent into the body. This will cause periodic acute bouts of stomach discomfort as well as anger, anxiety, and multiple somatic symptoms. A former lover is often suspected to have hired a practitioner of black magic to send the ampuu into the body. Another CSSI syndrome item assesses concerns of having low spiritual energy (rieusuy). While in a low-luck state, the person fails in all ventures, is predisposed to anger and other negative emotions such as fear, and is vulnerable to various types of spiritual attacks. Such spiritual attacks include nightmares, because nightmares are often interpreted as being the result of an assault by malevolent spirits as the sleeper’s soul wanders outside the body during sleep, with that attack only possible due to the person being in a weakened spiritual state (Hinton, Hinton, et al., 2009).
The CSSI also assesses one spiritual-type cultural syndrome that is the local interpretation of sleep paralysis, a syndrome that is common in the Cambodian population, particularly among those with PTSD (Hinton et al., 2005). In sleep paralysis, the person suddenly cannot move or speak and may see a shape come towards the body. Cambodian patients almost always see a shape during sleep paralysis, usually a black shadow, and they feel chest tightness when the shape reaches the body. And this shape is usually thought to be a malevolent spirit pushing down on the body and for this reason Cambodians refer to sleep paralysis as “a spirit pushes you down” (khmaoch sangot). Cambodians usually consider this shape to be a dangerous malevolent being, often the ghost of a dead person such as that of someone they saw killed during the Pol Pot period or of someone who died in the house in which they are now living. A bad death is believed to produce a malicious and vengeful spirit.
The clinic survey
The purpose of the survey was to assess traumatized Cambodian refugees attending a psychiatric clinic in a culturally sensitive manner by using the CSSI. We examined the relationship of the CSSI (CSSI total score, CSSI somatic and syndrome subscales, and CSSI items) to PTSD severity, and we investigated whether the CSSI total score or PTSD severity was more strongly correlated with self-perceived functioning.
Method
The survey occurred at a clinic that provides psychiatric services in Lowell, MA, USA, a city that is home to over 30,000 Cambodian refugees, the second largest community in the United States. Lowell is an urban center with high rates of crime and unemployment that is about an hour’s drive from Boston, MA. Patients are referred to the clinic by community primary care clinicians or by other patients. The survey only included patients who had initially presented to the clinic with PTSD, which was the case for 95% of patients. Most patients had been at the clinic for several years. Consecutive qualifying patients were given the PTSD Checklist (a measure of PTSD severity), the CSSI (a measure of culturally specific complaints and syndromes), and the SF-12 (a measure of self-perceived functioning). The project was approved by the clinic’s institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained. Of the 226 patients surveyed, 66% were women, with the average age being 52.6 (SD = 9.5). All participants had lived through the Pol Pot genocide. Only 5% of the patients were working, and the majority spent their time taking care of children or grandchildren. Almost all had a tenuous economic status, living at the poverty line.
Measures
PTSD Checklist (PCL)
The PCL assesses how much each of the 17 DSM–IV PTSD criteria has bothered the patient in the last month, each assessed on a 1–5 Likert-type scale (McDonald & Calhoun, 2010): 1 (not at all), 2 (a little bit), 3 (moderately), 4 (quite a bit), and 5 (extremely). The Cambodian version of the PCL has excellent test–retest (at 1 week) and interrater reliability (r = .91 and .95, respectively). Among the Cambodian population, the “44” cut-off score has excellent correspondence to the diagnosis made by a rater using the Structured Clinical Interview for PTSD (SCID) module for PTSD (k = .81; 30 patients) (Hinton, Rasmussen, Nou, Pollack, & Good, 2009).
Cambodian Somatic Symptom and Syndrome Inventory (CSSI)
The scale assesses somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes that are particularly salient among traumatized Cambodian population but are not assessed in the DSM-IV criteria. The CSSI items are divided into two subscales (see Table 1): a somatic scale (18 items) and a syndrome scale (19 items), with the syndrome scale having five subscales (see Table 1). The CSSI assesses how much the patient was bothered by certain somatic symptoms or syndromes in the last 4 weeks, each rated on a 0–4 Likert-type scale: 0 (not at all), 1 (a little bit), 2 (moderately), 3 (quite a bit), and 4 (extremely). We previously established the test–retest reliability with 30 patients for the somatic scale and syndrome scale (r = .91 and r = .89, respectively) and for the syndrome subscales (all rs > .85). The CSSI is not designed to indicate “disorder” at a certain average score of the scale or subscales. Rather the CSSI is intended to be used along with standardized assessment tools such as a PTSD measure to reveal the severity of certain culturally salient somatic complaints and cultural syndromes that are a key part of the presentation of trauma-related distress among Cambodian patients.
Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12)
The SF-12 is a measure of self-perceived health that has two subscales, one measuring emotional functioning and the other physical functioning (Ware, Kosinski, & Keller, 1996). The time frame is the last month. The score is standardized to the general population so that 50 represents the average level of functioning and each change of 10 points indicates 1 standard deviation from that mean, with lower scores indicating worse functioning. We have validated the scale for the Cambodian population in a previous study (Hinton, Sinclair, Chung, & Pollack, 2007).
Results
Reliability of the CSSI
In this study, the CSSI scales showed excellent internal consistency (see measures for previously obtained test–retest data). For the somatic scale, the alpha was .91, and for the syndrome scale, .88, with the all the multi-item syndrome subscales having excellent internal consistency as well (all alphas > .84).
PCL, CSSI, and SF-12 scores in the patient population
Relationship of the CSSI total score and subscales to PTSD severity on PCL
Note. CSSI = Cambodian Symptom and Syndrome Inventory. Each CSSI is rated on a 0–4 Likert-type scale. Each PTSD item is rated on a 1–5 Likert-type scale. The three groups are determined by the PCL scores: no PTSD = PCL score of 0–2.5; moderate PTSD = a PCL score of 2.6–3.6; and severe PTSD = a PCL score of 3.7–5.
p < .001; †for all scales, all follow-up paired independent samples t tests among the three groups were significant at p < .001
Relationship of syndromes of the CSSI to PTSD severity
p < .001; † for all scales, all follow-up paired independent samples t tests among the three groups were significant at p < .001, except the following for no PTSD versus moderate PTSD: Number 11, 14, 17.
CSSI scale and item scores at three levels of PTSD severity
Relationship of somatic symptoms of the CSSI to PTSD severity
p < .001; † for all scales, all follow-up paired independent samples t tests among the three groups were significant at p < .001, except the following for no PTSD versus moderate PTSD: Number 11, 13.
Correlation of the CSSI and PCL to Self-Perceived Functioning (SF-12)
The CSSI was more strongly related to the SF-12 than the PCL (r = .7 vs. r = .5), which was a statistically significant difference, Fisher’s z test, z = 3.4, p < .001.
Discussion
The survey confirmed that the somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes of the CSSI are a prominent aspect of the experience of PTSD among traumatized Cambodian refugees. Across each of the three levels of PTSD severity, there was a significant increase in the CSSI total score, the CSSI somatic and syndrome scales, and all the CSSI items. This suggests that Cambodian patients with significant PTSD not only have PTSD symptoms but also multiple culture-specific somatic symptoms as well as several culture-specific syndromes. We also found that the CSSI was more strongly correlated than the PTSD scale to self-perceived functioning.
Some of the CSSI somatic symptoms and syndromes were quite frequent or severe in the Cambodian group. One of these was “thinking a lot,” which had a mean score of 3.6 on the 0–4 Likert-type scale in the severe PTSD group. This complaint seems to result from several factors. As discussed earlier, traumatized populations appear to be predisposed to worry and to be hyperreactive to worry, with worry quickly escalating to a very anxious state (Hinton et al., 2011). Cambodians at the clinic almost all lived in a poor urban environment and were beset by financial, safety, and other concerns. They had many trauma memories from the Pol Pot period; they often nostalgically recalled relatives who died in the Pol Pot period; and had painful recollections of the many relatives who live in Cambodia and so were seldom seen. These factors led to the frequent experiencing of the syndrome of “thinking a lot.”
Three dizziness complaints (dizziness, dizziness upon standing, and “fear of fainting, khyâl overload, or heart attack upon standing up”) were extremely elevated and differentiated among the levels of severity of PTSD. Two other dizziness-type syndromes, (“poisoned by people” and “poisoned by cars”) also differentiated among levels of severity of PTSD. Other authors have noted the prominence of dizziness complaints among Cambodians, other Southeast Asian groups, and East Asians (Barrera, Wilson, & Norton, 2010; Hsu & Folstein, 1997). Kleinman and Kleinman (1994) argued that dizziness was one of the three paradigmatic distress complaints––along with exhaustion and pain––in China (see also Park, 2009). A recent survey of a student population in the United States found dizziness complaints to be particularly elevated in the panic attacks of Asian populations as compared to Caucasian and African American students (Barrera et al., 2010).
The four-dimension analysis described in the first part of this paper suggests why dizziness was such a prominent complaint among traumatized Cambodians at the clinic:
Dizziness is generated by the biology of trauma and anxiety, for example, through activation of the autonomic nervous system, through vagal effects, through impairment of the balance system (integration of visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular information), through PTSD effects on the orthostatic blood pressure response to standing up, and through anxiety and PTSD effects on motion sickness, with evidence that these orthostatic and motion sickness effects may be particularly marked in certain Asian populations; dizziness is considered to be a key indicator of ethnophysiological disturbance (dizziness is thought to indicate that khyâl is rushing into the head during a khyâl attack to cause all the disasters outlined in Table 2) and a key symptom of several syndromes, and these dizziness-centered ethnophysiology concerns and cultural syndromes result in dizziness by producing hypervigilant seeking of dizziness and catastrophic cognitions about dizziness that bring about a vicious circle of escalating arousal (“looping effects”) centered on dizziness; dizziness has extensive metaphoric resonances in the Cambodian language (e.g., spinning images in expressions used to convey distress) and this results in dizziness by metaphor-guided somatization and by dizziness-caused metaphor-network activation; and dizziness is associated with specific trauma events (e.g., slave labor when starving, head blows, malaria events) and this results in dizziness having the power to activate trauma memory networks and by the frequent recall of dizziness-linked trauma events.
The results of the survey indicate that PTSD symptoms are just the “tip of the iceberg” among distressed, traumatized Cambodian refugees. If PTSD is present, so too are multiple other somatic symptoms and syndromes such as dizziness and dizziness-related syndromes. These somatic symptoms and syndromes are often of equal or greater concern to Cambodian refugee patients than the symptoms of PTSD symptoms, and they are strongly correlated to self-perceived functioning. Cambodian patients are unfamiliar with such concepts as “PTSD” but are keenly aware of and concerned about culturally salient trauma-related somatic symptoms and syndromes, like dizziness upon standing or neck soreness, khyâl attacks, weak heart, “thinking a lot,” or the “ghost pushes you down.” Some of the cultural syndromes have PTSD symptoms as key symptoms; for example, startle and rapidly becoming angry are key symptoms of “weak heart.”
The four-dimension analysis indicates how certain somatic symptoms and cultural syndromes become a central part of a group’s specific trauma ontology. The biology of trauma will result in a certain “symptom pool” (Shorter, 1992). This symptom pool may include PTSD symptoms (e.g., poor sleep, nightmares, unwanted recall of the trauma, and anger) as well as other symptoms potentially caused by trauma: arousal and arousability, various somatic symptoms, and certain adjustment deficits such as poor orthostatic adjustment and a predisposition to motion sickness (Hinton & Good, 2009; Mayer, 2007). All these trauma-caused symptoms will be interpreted in terms of the local ethnophysiology, ethnopsychology, and cultural syndromes, resulting in certain symptoms being highlighted and amplified; and depending on the ethnophysiology and cultural syndrome the particular symptom is attributed to, the person will have certain ideas about the cause, severity, and indicated manner of redress of the symptom. Somatic symptoms may also be amplified by trauma associations and metaphoric resonances, which are further key symptom dimensions.
The current study suggests that researchers and clinicians working in other cultural settings among traumatized populations should create somatic symptom and syndrome inventories (a locally specific SSI) to supplement PTSD scales and other standardized psychometric instruments. In this way, a more adequate depiction of the local response to trauma can be obtained and the symptoms and syndromes of concern in that locality can be addressed in clinical care, increasing empathy, understanding, and treatment efficacy (Hinton & Lewis-Fernández, 2010). The development of such scales needs to include a four-dimension analysis that addresses both the biology of trauma and the three meaning dimensions (ethnophysiology/cultural syndromes; metaphoric resonances; trauma associations) of each somatic symptom. Additionally, there should be a careful examination of the potential triggers of somatic symptoms and of particular cultural syndromes (Hinton et al., 2011). Only through a four-dimension analysis conjoined with an analysis of particular distress episodes can the meaning, manner of generation, and method of treatment of somatic symptoms and syndromes become clear.
Footnotes
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
