Abstract
Suicide is considered to be a conscious and intentional act that is carried out within a social and cultural context. This study examines the unique phenomenon of a cluster of suicide attempts conducted without perceived intent, ideation, plan, volition, or agency in a remote province in Central Asia. This study investigated the lived experiences of individuals who made such unintended suicide attempts and examined the differences between these experiences and those of individuals who made their suicide attempt with intent and agency. The authors conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data originally collected for a prior grounded theory study. The present study examined a specific and unique set of participant experiences related to suicide attempts made without agency. Results found that instances of suicide attempts made without perceived intent by participants included themes of impulsivity, not knowing what happened, feeling out of control, attributing these experiences to the supernatural, and being fearful of such events occurring again. Clinical practice may need to be adapted to address experiences of such unique suicide attempt experiences. In addition, further research is warranted to understand and examine the phenomenon of suicide attempts carried out without perceived intent, ideation, plan, volition, or agency.
Introduction
Suicide is widely accepted as a willful intentional act to end one’s own life. However, suicide intention cannot be conceptualized as binary “intending to die” versus “not intending to die,” as suicide intent is more effectively understood across a spectrum. Some individuals attempt suicide as a cry for help with no intention to end their life (Freedenthal, 2007), while others may attempt suicide based on a poorly defined, vague, impulsive, or partially constructed intent, with a less than clear understanding of the results of their actions (Ledewitz, 2001). For others, their intentions are based on feeling trapped in current circumstances or not wanting to live, rather than an aim to end their existence. Researchers contend that suicidal intent is difficult to assess and individuals attempting suicide do not always know what their intentions are at the time of the attempt (Hjelmeland, 1996). Although death can accidently occur as a result of one’s own actions (e.g., unintentional overdose, autoerotic asphyxiation, etc.), these actions are not defined as a suicide attempt (Rockett & Caine, 2020). A suicide attempt, however, as per its definition does require some degree of intent, whether a fully intentional act or a less defined thought. This research focuses on a rare phenomenon where some individuals attempted suicide without any discernible intention or self-agency in their identifiable suicidal action, but where the action is in no way defined or understood as an accident.
This study is based on prior qualitative grounded theory research in Central Asia (Savani, 2020) investigating 12 individuals who self-identified as having made a suicide attempt. Four participants interviewed identified their suicide attempts as having occurred without perceived ideation, intention, agency, or volition. To fully examine this phenomenon, a thematic secondary analysis was conducted on the described lived experiences of these individuals. This research will further describe the differences between the four individuals attempting suicide without agency and those eight individuals who knowingly attempted suicide.
Suicide is a serious and complex problem experienced in every region across the world. Although 79% of all suicides occur in the low- and middle-income countries around the world (WHO, 2019), most research on suicide is conducted in richer countries. Across the world, suicide appears to have different epidemiology, with causes ranging from biology, genetics, and mental health, to religious, spiritual, familial, social, and economic. In many Asian countries, risk factors for suicide relate to social problems like family disputes, unemployment, and gender-based violence rather than individual, mental health issues (Goldsmith et al., 2002; Vijayakumar, 2015). The current study was conducted in Central Asia, where suicide is poorly researched despite high rates in the region (Savani et al., 2020).
This study is a secondary analysis of the interview data collected for a prior grounded theory project. The study aims to explore the particular phenomenon of suicide attempts without intention, volition, or agency. Initial data collection revealed one-third of participants experienced an unusual, out of the ordinary, trance-like state during their suicide attempt, which they described as unusual, uncharacteristic, and novel. Of the 12 (seven female and five male) participants who made a suicide attempt, four participants (one female and three male) reported no ideation, no plan, no volition, and no agency in the attempt. Nonetheless, each of these participants clearly described becoming aware of their suicide attempt after the act; this history was often supported by family members. These participants reported making their attempt in a state where they were not conscious nor had any awareness of making the attempt, nor any pre- or post-suicide intention. This study is guided by the following research questions:
What are the lived experiences of individuals who made a suicide attempt without perceived intention, ideation, volition, or agency? What are the differences between the experiences of individuals making a suicide attempt without agency and those who made their attempt knowingly?
Methods
Study setting
The geographical context for this study is the province of Badakhshan, Tajikistan. Of the five countries in Central Asia, Tajikistan is the smallest and the poorest, with the average monthly salary being 93 USD and almost 40% of its gross domestic product coming from remittances sent home by migrant workers (Country Watch, 2018). The province is home to the Pamir Mountain range, with extreme weather conditions, socio-economic vulnerability, and isolation (Davlatshoev, 2006). The present study is a secondary analysis of the data obtained as part of the grounded theory study, conducted between June 2019 and December 2019, in Badakhshan, Tajikistan, and received approval from the University of Houston Institutional Review Board.
The original grounded theory study on lived experiences of Suicide in Badakhshan was guided by the following research questions: (1) How do individuals in Badakhshan experience a suicide attempt? (2) What are the socio-cultural-religious factors that have contributed to that attempt? Data for this study were collected from different parts of the province from 12 individuals who made a suicide attempt, and subsequently analyzed to formulate a mid-range theory about suicide attempts in Badakhshan, Tajikistan (Savani, 2020). The study used Charmaz’s (2006) constructivist grounded theory methodology which allowed for the examination of how social, historical, cultural, and religious context of this region influences the phenomenon of suicide among those who experienced it. The present study is a secondary analysis of the data obtained during the original study.
Data collection
Recruitment was conducted in summer 2019 by word of mouth through community organizers, leaders, and influencers. Inclusion criteria were being 18 + years of age, residing in Badakhshan, and making a suicide attempt. Five male and seven female participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview protocol provided in supplemental file. Interviews lasted 45 min to 1.5 h and were conducted in the local languages by research assistants. The following are examples of two questions asked during the interviews:
All of us face difficulties in life. What are some difficulties that you are experiencing in your life? Prompt: Let’s start with work, money, family. When did you first think about suicide? What were some things that happened that led up to your decision to make the attempt?
Demographic information was collected via a questionnaire. All interviews were recorded, after obtaining verbal consent, and transcribed into English with the help of two local research assistants. Safeguards on the translation process included two research assistants translating and transcribing interviews independently of each other. The PI compared the transcripts, and consensus was obtained through discussions between the PI and the two research assistants.
Analysis
Secondary data analysis is a well-established methodology for quantitative data. However, secondary analysis of qualitative data as a research methodology has only become known more recently. In qualitative research, secondary data analysis involves using existing qualitative data previously collected to explore a new or different research question not explored in the previous analysis (Heaton, 2004, 2008). Qualitative secondary analysis can provide new insights into the phenomenon explored by focusing on a particular concept that existed in the original data but was not the focus of analysis previously (Perrino et al., 2013).
In this study, the lived experiences of suicide attempts are further explored by examining the interview data of those individuals who attempted suicide while reporting that they had no agency in the attempt and comparing it to the data from other participants. For this secondary analysis, Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic approach to analysis was used. Researchers read the transcripts several times, developed codes, and noted emerging themes. Thematic analysis as a qualitative research method is best used for identifying, analyzing, organizing, describing, and reporting themes found in the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006). For this study, the authors looked at the interview data of those who made a suicide attempt without volition and compared it to the data from the other participants.
Thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke (2006) is frequently used to explore participant experiences. The researchers read the interview transcripts several times and familiarized themselves with the content. Subsequently, both researchers coded the transcripts manually and identified themes from the codes until they reached consensus. The thematic analysis was based on the common experiences narrated by the participants. The four special interviews (of participants who made a suicide attempt without perceived agency) were separated from the rest of the interviews for comparative analysis. Themes from those four interviews were generated separately and then compared with the themes from the other interviews. The themes generated were based on action or thoughts of the participants (e.g., “I didn’t do it,” or “I don’t know what happened”) or omission of action or thought (e.g., “no justification for the attempt”).
Findings
Of the 12 participants interviewed, seven were female and five were male, with an average age of 34 years. Most participants resided in rural areas (n = 9), were married (n = 7), were of low socioeconomic status (SES), and self-identified as religious based on their participation in prayers and other religious activities (see Table 1 for further demographic data). Religiosity was coded from transcripts. Participants who were coded as using more religious terms (five words or more) were categorized as “very religious,” whereas participants who used fewer terms (fewer than five words) were categorized as “religious.” Specifically, all 12 participants identified as being practicing Muslims. Eight of the 12 participants reported knowing someone else who had either attempted or died by suicide. All 12 participants were from different villages in the province and had no geographical proximity to each other.
Participant demographic information.
Four of the 12 participants in this study made a suicide attempt without any reported intent, ideation, plan, or agency. Each of these four participants self-identified as being religious. Further, none of these participants reported to have any mental illness, including psychotic disorders, mood disorders, substance use disorders, or personality disorders, and were very functional in their daily lives. Each of these four individuals reported that they did not have any significant reason to kill themselves. They also reported having no prior intent to end their lives. These participants described that the suicide attempt happened to them and that the action of making the suicide attempt was not of their own doing. Three of these four participants attributed their attempt to an altered state of mind, akin to being in a trance. They described their experience as related to the metaphysical realm and made sense of their attempt in religious and spiritual terms. Further, each of these participants stated that they did not want to ever attempt suicide again and were afraid that this would happen to them in the future. Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of these four individuals shaded in grey.
Describing the trance-like state
Four of the 12 participants who made a suicide attempt reported having no ideation, plan, agency, or awareness of the attempt, as if the attempt occurred while each was in an altered state of mind. Participants described the experience of the suicide attempt as being in an out-of-reality, almost trance-like state. They each described themselves as though they had no control over what was happening to them. Participants talked about being possessed by the spirits, an idea that is not uncommon in this region of the world. One participant used the word wahm, a Shughni word used to describe a state in which one feels attacked by the spirits, not in control of one’s own thoughts and behavior, and experiences a choking sensation with liquid coming out of the nose and mouth.
None of the participants used the word “trance”; the researchers used the term as it reflected the similarly described experiences. All these four suicide attempts were described as a sudden occurrence, made on impulse. According to the participants, the attempt was a sudden event that happened in their life. One participant said while describing the event that “it came suddenly.” They described their experience as an abrupt and swift episode, which they later came to know as a suicide attempt. These were remarkable findings in the data and were a significant factor associated with suicide in this geographical and cultural context. Participants attributed their attempt to an experience that was difficult to explain with logic. This experience was reported as frightening, confusing, illogical, and bothersome. However, the other eight participants who knowingly made their suicide attempt did not report any such experiences, even though some of their attempts were impulsive.
Common themes in trance-like suicide attempts
In comparing the participant interview data for the four individuals who had no perceived agency in their suicide attempt with the data for the eight participants who were aware, intended to attempt, and acknowledged their attempt, there were unique differences. In closely examining the textual data from the four participants in the trance-like suicide attempts, some common themes emerged which were not found in the data on the other eight participants.
Theme 1: Impulsivity
Impulsivity was a common experience among participants who made their attempt without perceived ideation, plan, or agency. All four participants described their suicide attempt as a very impulsive act. Impulsivity in terms of a suicide attempt means being hasty, instinctive, and spontaneous in the decision to attempt suicide. In addition, it often refers to individuals who do not have suicidal thoughts for long before their quick and sudden decision to act to take their own life. For the four participants who reported this experience, all described an impulsive and unconscious act. All four participants in this category had no time and space between thought and action, and each claimed to have never thought about suicide during the act or ever in their lifetime.
The first participant, a 23-year-old woman, described her attempt as a sudden occurrence. She said that it was a usual day, but she got up in the morning and she drank the poison. There was no forethought or planning. It happened suddenly, she says: “I never thought about it [suicide].” Her brother found her on the floor after she had consumed the poison and took her to the hospital. The second participant, a 42-year-old man, claimed to have never thought about suicide in his life, but suddenly went to the river and dropped himself in the water. He said: “suddenly I was choking and [I] changed my direction and went to the river.” This participant went to the river, dropped himself in the river, and went along for about 1,200 meters before he realized what he had done. When he realized what he had done, he came out of the river.
The third participant, a 40-year-old man, said: “I am telling you the truth, I did not have any thoughts about it [suicide]” and “planning suicide in advance was not even in my thoughts. I am saying the truth.” This participant was going about his normal day when he suddenly got a rope and hanged himself outside of his home. His wife and neighbors rescued him and took him to hospital. The fourth participant, a 20-year-old student, said: “telling you the truth, I never had any thoughts about attempting suicide. It just came suddenly.” This participant was watching a video game when he suddenly got out some rope and hanged himself on the roof of his home.
All four participants stated that they had never thought about suicide, did not have any reason to consider suicide, and that the attempt occurred very suddenly. Interview data on the other eight participants reveal that four of the eight comparable participants were non-impulsive and planned out their intended suicidal behavior. The other four reported their suicide attempts as impulsive, but clearly connected their conscious thoughts about suicide with the attempted suicide. One 20-year-old female participant said: Not only my aunt but also her daughter instigated me every time and provoked her mother against me, and then both of them would beat me together. Once I was beaten so cruelly; I was in 10th grade at that time and didn’t know what to do and where to go … After that, I tried for the second time to commit suicide.
There is a marked difference in the narratives for the four individuals who attempted suicide without perceived agency and the other eight participants who made their suicide attempt with full awareness of their action.
Theme 2: “I don’t know what happened”
A common claim made by the four participants who made their self-identified suicide attempt without perceived agency was that they did not know exactly what had happened. Three of the four were rescued by family members, and only in hindsight came to think of their action as a suicide attempt. A 23-year-old woman said: “I don’t know what happened. I got up early morning, I said my prayers, I prepared breakfast … I was in Dushanbe [the city] and it was a Sunday … and I don’t know what happened … after that I did this [drank poison].” The participant’s brother found her on the floor and took her to hospital. She said: “My brother got up early and said, ‘What happened to you? You drank poison!! Why??’ [but] I don’t know what happened.”
Another male participant (42 years old) maintained the same claim about not knowing what had happened. He had jumped into a river and describes being swept away by the river for a few hundred meters before he realized what had happened. He said: “I don’t know how it happened. I wanted to go to my brother-in-law’s house, but suddenly I was choking and [I] changed my direction and went to the river.” He went on further to say: “that day when I went to the river, I don’t remember how I got there.”
The third participant, a 40-year-old male who had suddenly hanged himself outside his home, said: “I don’t know [what happened] because I don’t even remember how I did it. I didn’t have any thoughts about [suicide].” The youngest of these four participants was a male student who was 20 years old and had hanged himself suddenly. He said “To tell you the truth, I did not have any thoughts about attempting suicide. It just came suddenly … I don’t know what happened.”
The eight participants who acknowledged making a suicide attempt never claimed not knowing what happened. They talked about their life being very difficult and acknowledged thinking about suicide and making the attempt. One 20-year-old participant said: I remember the exact moment [of the attempt] clearly. My grandmother and I were in the corridor and then she said, “Don’t you think that our neighbors and relatives—all of them know that you are not my son’s daughter, you don’t have a mother and you are living with [your step-father] in one house.” After that, I went to my room, I was hysterical and then I decided to take the pills.
This participant was able to clearly describe her thoughts and actions as she attempted suicide. The other seven participants in this category were also able to provide details of historical events in their life that triggered thoughts about suicide and the subsequent action, and they described in detail how they made their attempts knowingly and with full awareness.
Theme 3: “It was out of my control”
All four participants claimed that the suicide attempt happened to them as opposed to them making the attempt. Throughout their interview, they maintained that they had never thought about suicide, considered suicide, or even had any significant reason to consider suicide. All four participants stated explicitly that what had happened to them was out of their control and they had no agency or control over what had happened. A 23-year-old female participant said: “My mother asked me, ‘Do you have any problems? What happened to you?’ She kept on asking, but I did not have any problems. I said ‘I don’t know why I did this.’” She further said: “My brother and my cousin brought me to the hospital. At that time, I did not know what happened. After three or four days, I came to know.”
The second participant, a 42-year-old man who jumped in a river, said: “Even that day when I went to the river, I don’t remember at all how I got there … I didn’t want to die.” The third participant, a 40-year-old man, said: “When I became conscious, I saw people around me, and they told me about what I did, but I didn’t believe it. The only thing I remember, when I became conscious, is that I was wet and there were people around me.” The last participant in this category, a 20-year-old man, said: “Later on, after being released from the hospital, I could remember one more thing little by little; I don’t remember how I came out of house, but I remember how I took the rope and used the ladder to go upstairs on the rooftop.”
The common theme in the narratives of these four participants is their state of not being aware of what happened to them as it happened and not having control of their own actions during the attempt. All four of them made statements along the lines of “I don’t know what happened, I don’t know how this happened, and I don’t remember doing this.”
The eight participants who acknowledged making a suicide attempt did not claim their experience to be out of control. They spoke at length about their thoughts and actions leading up to their attempt and recognized their agency in that action. A 46-year-old participant said: “Those days were difficult for us. My father was blind, my mother was also unable to work, and they were old. Then I started thinking that instead of suffering like this, I better die.” Most participants expressed regret at making the suicide attempt.
Theme 4: Element of the supernatural
All 12 participants who were interviewed made sense of their attempt in many different ways. The eight participants who made their attempt knowingly reflected back on their intentions and actions to rationalize their suicidal behavior in logical ways. They spoke of their life being very hard and most spoke of a specific incident that drove them to consider suicide (e.g., abandonment by a boyfriend, allegations of promiscuous behavior, gossip about their mother having an affair, having no money to survive). In comparison, the four participants who were not cognizant of their attempt made sense of their attempt in ways that involved invoking the spiritual or the supernatural, because there was nothing logical about why the suicide attempt had happened to them. These participants were unable to explain their attempt in terms that made sense even to themselves. They articulated that they did not have a choice in the act, that they did not really do anything, that they were made to attempt suicide by an external force. To make sense of something that appeared out of the ordinary and irrational, participants used explanations and symbolism that pertained to the supernatural or spiritual.
For example, the 23-year-old female participant who drank poison described the event as occurring during a conversation she was having with her deceased father. She reported: I also remember I was talking with my father; I saw him. I was talking with him just as I am talking with you. He was saying “My daughter, my dear daughter, my beautiful daughter, my nice daughter” but after two days when I woke up, I was in the hospital. What happened to me? My brother said to my mother, “She did this [drank poison]” but I was with my father. My father died five years ago, but I was with my father. (Emphasis added)
This participant was convinced that she saw, met, and spoke with her deceased father in the same moment that she drank the poison.
The second participant, a 42-year-old male, left his store one evening and intended to go to his brother-in-law’s house. Instead, he walked into the river without being conscious of what he had done. He attributed his attempt to wahm. Wahm is a word in the Shughni language (one of the local languages) that means a feeling of being attacked by the spirits, of being scared, of being followed, leading to shivering, tears, a runny nose, and choking. According to this participant, he had a fall by a gravesite a few months ago and hit his head against a stone. He says that all his problems started after that fall because he came into the possession of wahm at that time. For him, it is because of the wahm that the suicide attempt happened to him. He said: I went to the river and dropped myself into the water. I went about 1,200 meters and only after that, I became conscious [of what I had done] and tried to come out of the water. I don’t know how it happened. It was a typical day; I woke up as usual at 7:00 am and went to the shop. Suddenly, I felt [like I was] choking and could not breathe at all—liquid came out of my mouth and nose.
The third participant, a 40-year-old man, also described his attempt in terms of the supernatural. He said that he came home from a wedding one afternoon and saw a man dressed in white. He said that the man had a white beard, was wearing white clothes and a white turban, and offered the participant a garland of flowers. The participant then followed this man outside his home, got a rope, and hanged himself on a beam outside his house. He noted: I came out of the house and suddenly I saw an old man in front of me. He gave me a garland of flowers and wanted me to wear it and the rest I don’t remember—how I got to the storage which is behind the house and took the rope for hanging. I came around carrying a big barrel from the back of the house. There is a big piece of wood coming out of the house by the ceiling. I put on the rope, and hanged myself. And I don’t remember how I took the rope because I didn’t even know the exact location of the rope in the storage.
When questioned about this “man dressed in white,” the participant said that he had never seen this man before, and that the man was not someone he knew or recognized and was not a “real” person. This participant was seen hanging by his wife, who screamed for help and got him down with the help of neighbors.
The final participant with this type of unusual experience was a 20-year-old male student who was playing a seemingly benign video game when he abruptly ran to the roof, got a rope, and hanged himself. He said: That day as usual I came home from school and played with my brothers. After that, they went to do their jobs and I went to play on the computer; the rest I don’t remember what happened. My father is a singer and that day he was at a wedding. It was autumn, the month of October, and we were collecting apples. My mother went to a meeting and my older brother and younger brother came back from school. Together with my brothers, we did our housework and played on the computer. I don’t remember how I came out of house, but I remember how I took the rope and used the ladder to go upstairs on the rooftop. There were beams [on the roof] from one side to another side. I was in coma for five days and then I became conscious. After that, I was released [from the hospital] and went home.
Except for the 20-year-old male, who was younger and still a student at university, the other three participants explained their experience as related to something that was spiritual, transcendental, or supernatural. In their rationalization of the suicide attempt experience, these participants maintained that they did not consider suicide and made the attempt without any agency whatsoever. Because these participants had not considered suicide and did not have the intent to attempt suicide, their experience of their own suicide attempt was very confusing, frightening, and illogical. They attributed their attempt to a supernatural or transcendental force that was external to them.
The outcome of “making sense” of the attempt was very different for the other eight participants in the study who made their attempt knowingly and consciously. One participant stated: I was looking at my father and seeing him suffer, I felt so bad for him. Then I thought, I don’t want to see all this. My father could not see; he was blind. My mother could not work, so I thought to myself, instead of looking at them like this and see them suffering I better hang myself, and I don’t have to see it anymore. Every day was like this.
These eight participants had what they viewed as a logical explanation for why they made their attempt, how life was so difficult for them that their suicide attempt was inevitable.
Theme 5: Fear of a similar, repeat attempt in the future
Another common theme among those not conscious of their attempt was the fear or anxiety that this non-intentional attempt might happen again. This fear was very real because these participants did not acknowledge intent to kill themselves and described their attempt to be out of their control. Because of this, they each reported an ongoing fear or anxiety that something like this might happen again in their life. The 20-year-old male participant said: It was two years ago, I was a volunteer and for us [volunteers] there was a workshop on the topic of suicide. We were told that if a person tried attempting suicide once, he would do it again. Now I am scared of repeating and I don’t want to do it again.
Later on, during that interview, he again mentioned this fear: “I am scared about repeating the suicide attempt. This is what I don’t want to do. I want to know if this will be repeated or not.”
In the same vein, the 42-year-old male participant said: “I do not want to die. This problem [wahm] leads me to think of suicide and it started after I fell down at the grave site.” The third participant in this category, the 40-year-old man, referring to his attempt said: “I want to know what happened that day and how it happened … After that incident, I was even scared to look at that side where I hanged myself. When it gets dark, I don’t even look there.”
None of the eight participants who were cognizant of their attempt expressed fear that they would attempt suicide again. In fact, most of them expressed confidence that they would not attempt it again, that their life was better now, that their first attempt was a mistake, and that they were grateful that the attempt was unsuccessful. Fear about making a suicide attempt in the future was not found in the interview data for these eight participants.
Theme 6: No justification of attempt
The eight participants who were aware of their attempt justified their attempt with coherent explanations. They talked about their life being difficult and that although the suicide attempt was a mistake, they acknowledged making that mistake. One 20-year-old participant shared her difficulties: I always had problems. There was not a single day I didn’t cry and had peace. I could hear only the humiliation and unkind words from everyone … I didn’t even have friends to share my difficulties with, and then I attempted suicide.
A 46-year-old said: It was always money. If I had money, there wouldn’t be difficulties. My mum didn’t work, my father was blind. At home, there was nobody who could earn money. [My siblings and I] were all students and the only income was my father’s pension.
The rest of the participants in this category had similar experiences of difficulties which they related to their attempt.
The four participants who claimed to not have agency in their attempt provided no such justification. They maintained that they had no reason to consider suicide. Although their life was challenging, they described that they were not so overwhelmed with their difficulties that they would consider suicide. All four participants repeatedly asserted that they did not make the attempt, had no control over the attempt, and, therefore, did not have a need to provide a justification for why they made the attempt. Three of the four participants detailed an explanation that involved the supernatural, whereas the fourth participant remained unsure about why this sudden and unusual experience had happened to him.
Discussion
Four out of the 12 people interviewed for this study reported making a suicide attempt without perceived intent, or otherwise acknowledging agency in the attempt. For these participants, something unusual in their suicide attempt reportedly occurred. One participant described their suicide attempt as something “I did not do.” This was a unique phenomenon reported by some individuals, which we were unable to clearly identify elsewhere in the literature. While a number of medical, psychiatric, cultural, and environmental possibilities may exist for these rarely presented experiences, which are explored below, an unexpected phenomenon emerged in this study. While not identified, reported, or examined in the literature, some participants clearly reported that it is possible to experience such occurrences.
This rare phenomenon of suicide attempts where participants claim to not have intention, ideation, or agency has some unique features. These attempts were highly impulsive actions, described as sudden occurrences. Individuals stated never thinking about suicide prior to the attempt and having no reason to consider suicide, yet they experienced a suicide attempt. These phenomena were also events where participants claimed to not know what happened and questioned why such an event had occurred. Moreover, participants stated that the action of the suicide attempt was not carried out by them and that it was not of their own doing, as if someone or something had taken over and they were left with only a partial memory of the event. In addition, participants ascribed spiritual or transcendental meanings to these occurrences, but it remains unclear if this was done because these phenomena were hard to explain in any other way.
The occurrence of suicide attempts occurring without perceived intent, ideation, plan, volition, or agency raises a number of possibilities. First, that such a phenomenon may have been proxies for other conditions relating to medical, mental health, or substance use issues, cultural or religious factors, environmental or community factors, or individual coping mechanisms, as discussed below. Second, that such a phenomenon reflects experiences that truly exist, that may be specific to some cultures across the world, and that the research and clinical communities need to explore and examine further.
Suicide attempts without ideation, intention, or agency may be related to medical, psychiatric, substance use, cultural or environmental factors. There is some evidence for such attempts being related to certain medical conditions. Studies have found unusual and dramatic self-injurious behavior related to Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorder (Harish et al., 2012), where there is often no cognition or memory of the suicide attempt. Research indicates that suicide attempts that are associated with substance use and depression may limit the cognitive abilities of the attempters (Mean, et al., 2005; Suominen et al., 1996). In addition, there is evidence of such suicide attempts occurring in an altered state of mind where individuals deny having agency in or memory of the act that seemed like a suicide attempt (Waltzer, 1968). Occurrences like such suicide attempts where there is a sudden, fleeting occurrence of unusual behavior where intent or memory is lacking are reported to be more common in low- and middle-income countries (Pillmann et al., 2003).
In our findings from the participants who spoke of such suicide attempts, no prevalence of such medical conditions or mental health / substance use issues was identified, but full assessments were not conducted. While there is a possibility that these participants may have suffered from a psychotic disorder during the time of their suicide attempt that led to the lack of intent or awareness about the attempt, when interviewed these participants presented as oriented, coherent, and lucid; they spoke clearly and understandably and did not demonstrate any unusual or abnormal behavior. Also, these participants went about their normal life and were demonstrably functional as a teacher, a store owner in retail business, a farmer, and a student. None reported impairments in their social and occupational functioning.
Another possibility for these unusual suicide attempts could be related to religious and cultural beliefs. Research has posited that suicidal behaviors and meanings are influenced by culture (Chu et al., 2010; Lester, 2009). In the aftermath of their attempt, three out of the four participants ascribed religious meaning to their attempts. Participants spoke of being possessed by the spirits, communicating with the dead, and being asked to carry out an action by a mystical figure all dressed in white. In many Asian countries, the color white is associated with piety, religiosity, wisdom, and religious leadership. Conversely, participants may have intentionally or unintentionally borrowed local religious and cultural norms and symbolism to rationalize their suicide attempt. Researchers have found that notions of being possessed by the spirits are associated with mental disturbances and out-of-the-ordinary behavior in many parts of the world (Arieli & Aychen, 1994). In addition, the idea of being possessed has been posited in low-resource contexts as an explanation for behavior that is unknown and cannot be explained (Ventriglio et al., 2018). Further, attributing mental illness or other out-of-the-ordinary behavior to supernatural forces is not uncommon (Dein & Illaiee, 2013). Specifically, the concept of jinn possession among Muslim communities has references in the Quran and has historically been used to explain serious mental illness (Islam & Campbell, 2014). Scholars have researched the idea of jinn possession in relation to mental illness, epilepsy, and other illnesses within Muslim communities (Obeid et al., 2012). In our findings, one participant spoke of having wahm, which refers to being attacked by the spirits and not in control of one’s own thoughts and behavior. The concept of wahm, although prevalent in the Central Asian context, has unfortunately not received much attention in the literature. The meaning of the suicide attempt event within this study highlights the cultural importance of understanding suicide attempts. In Chu et al.’s (2010) cultural model of suicide, three theoretical principles are identified within minority groups, specifically how culture affects: the types of stressors that lead to suicide, meanings associated with stressors, and how suicidal thoughts and attempts are expressed. Although this study examined the dominant culture rather than minority cultures, findings may lend support to the third principle that culture affects how suicidal attempts are expressed. Future research exploring the cultural model and theories of suicide are recommended.
One participant spoke of having a conversation with her deceased father, another spoke of seeing someone who appeared to him as a religious authority and took him to hang himself, and another spoke of experiencing wahm. Three of the four participants spoke of being in a space where something happened related to the supernatural. Each of the participants were open and engaging during the interview. They presented as oriented, with normal attention and concentration, cognitively lucid, readily able to recall past events, and demonstrated an appropriate range of affect during the interview.
Also, these experiences could be related to the societal, community, and religious pressure on their behavior. Some scholars have reported that individuals who hurt themselves may deny suicidal intent or pretend to have intent for other gains (Freedenthal, 2007). In the local religious and legal context, suicide is forbidden. Study participants identified as Muslim, reflecting the dominant religion in their larger community and regional population. The Quran has explicit prohibitions around suicide, as does the country’s legal code that decrees aiding and abetting suicide a punishable offense (Mishara, 2020). With clear negative proscriptions against suicide, community responses to suicide are often highly stigmatized, with categorical condemnation of suicide the norm. Individuals who attempt suicide risk tarnishing their public image as a good Muslim and a good citizen, should it be discovered that they have attempted suicide. Although these individuals may not be intentionally hiding evidence of their actions, they may be under extreme pressure to provide alternative explanations for such taboo action such as supernatural or spiritual attributions. Such responses may be tacit and a consequence of living in a society that condemns suicide and may also be a way for some people to save face and family honor, and avoid stigma of mental illness, as has been identified in other Muslim contexts (Khan and Reza, 2000). Consequently, these suicide attempts without agency could be a response to negative social and community judgement frequently ascribed to individuals engaging in suicidal behavior.
The religious and moral code in this context bans suicide. The Quran is more explicit and harsher about prohibiting suicide than the Bible (Alonzo & Gearing, 2018). Two specific verses of the Quran that condemn suicide are: “And do not kill yourselves. Surely God is Most Merciful to you” (Q 4:29) and “And do not throw yourselves in destruction” (Q 2:195) (Ibrahim, 2020). Further, several prophetic traditions continue to maintain the prohibition of suicide and the value and sanctity of human life (Shah & Chandia, 2010). The socio-cultural-religious context of Tajikistan, the rural, traditional environment, local suicide beliefs and taboos, and the Quranic prohibitions of suicide create a backdrop where acknowledging a suicide attempt may be perceived as shameful and there may be significant public pressure to “conform” to the religious code as a Muslim. In doing so, there may be internal pressure to deny thinking about, planning, or engaging in any suicidal behavior. In the aftermath of a suicide attempt, belief that there was no suicidal intent or agency may provide a way that a “good” Muslim may avoid ongoing negative stigma. Consciously acknowledging the attempt and/or internalizing the belief that they made the attempt may be going against a negative ingrained dogma of suicide prohibition for some individuals. Stigma and/or cultural norms pressuring some to observe and follow the moral code may have been a defining feature of how these individuals conceptualized their suicide attempt.
The spiritual or transcendental meaning ascribed to the suicide attempt may have provided an effective defense structure designed to reconcile with what was forbidden in Islam, such as a suicide attempt. All four participants were Muslim, and as a faith, Islam prohibits suicide. The faith of all four participants may have been a barrier in confronting or acknowledging what really happened, and the spiritual/transcendental meaning ascribed to the attempt may have been an interpretation of the event that these participants were able to live with. For instance, one of the four participants said that suicide was wrong for Muslims, and it was the worst behavior that a Muslim could engage in. She said: “It [suicide] is worst for Muslims, God gave to us soul, a clean soul, and we have to give it back clean—but not this way, not with suicide—only if God wants.” While other participants did not say this specifically about suicide, all of them acknowledged being Muslim and practicing the faith. In addition, talking about the suicidal behavior as an action where they did not make the attempt or have agency in their suicidal behavior may have lessened the perceived community stigma or burden that came with having made a suicide attempt in this religious context. Suicide attempts where survivors deny intent, ideation, or agency, or attribute it to supernatural causes remain hard to explain given the insufficient knowledge, insight, or tools available to examine such behavior. Specifically, the concept of wahm or jinn possession as it relates to mental illness and suicide attempts in Muslim communities needs to be investigated further. Research that relates to individuals identifying as Muslim and representing mental illness or suicide attempts being influenced by wahm needs further attention.
Notwithstanding the cause of these non-agency suicide attempts, there are implications for assessment and treatment across cultural groups. The phenomenon of non-agency suicide attempts may pose potential clinical implications. Standard assessments as they are currently constructed to assess and identify risk for clients may not capture this phenomenon. If clinicians are unaware that such phenomena could exist, they may not be asking questions to identify these experiences. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (Posner, 2011) and other established instruments are not built to capture the described experiences and may not be able to assess suicide risk accurately when used.
It is recommended that suicide assessments in contexts where such rare suicide attempts do occur may have to be modified. For example, questions like “Have you ever had an experience where you put your life in danger without wanting to do so or without realizing that you are doing so?” need to be considered as potential additions to clinical assessments. Clinical suicide assessments and research on lived experiences of suicide need to capture such phenomena that may not seem like clear suicide attempts. If these occurrences do exist and may be experienced by some individuals, further understanding and investigation is warranted on this phenomenon.
Limitations
This is the first study to investigate suicide among the population in Badakhshan, Tajikistan; a remote Muslim province of Central Asia. This study set out to explore the lived experiences of suicide in this limited geographical location. A major limitation of this study is its small sample size. The original grounded theory study included data from 12 participant interviews. Of these, only four participants had suicide attempt experiences without ideation, intent, volition, or agency. This is a relatively small number of participants, limiting the inferences that can be made with this research. Another limitation of the study was an entirely female research team (resulting in more female participants) and the author’s inability to speak the local languages. Further, data collected by the research assistants in the local languages were directly transcribed into English and not translated back into the original language. Given that there is a paucity of prior research on suicide in Tajikistan, and there are no studies in the province of Badakhshan, the present study is limited.
Conclusion
Studies show that 48% of suicide attempts occur within 10 min of thought (Deisenhammer et al., 2009; Hawton, 2007; Simon et al., 2005), and some of these may take place much more quickly and impulsively. This study examined rare occurrences of suicide attempts in which individuals seemed to not have intention, awareness, or agency of action, but attempted to end their lives to their own surprise and that of family and friends. The study explored these suicide attempts through the lived experience of four suicide attempters. Results indicate that these attempts were impulsive, participants had no control over what happened to them, and most participants attributed their attempts to a spiritual experience. Unintended suicide attempts represent a rare, yet real, phenomenon that is embedded in local cultural and family context and demands greater attention from psychiatric clinicians and researchers. In geographical contexts where such suicide attempts do occur, suicide prevention and intervention efforts need to identify and address these phenomena.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
This research was partially funded by the Institute of Ismaili Studies, London, UK.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was partially funded by a grant from the Institute of Ismaili Studies, London.
