This article reviews Improving Schools to assess the journal’s distinctive contributions within the school improvement literature and the extent to which its positioning has supported cumulative knowledge development. Using bibliometric and systematic review methods, the study analyzes the journal’s full corpus published between 1998 and 2025. Patterns of authorship, citation distribution, publication type, topical organization, and journal co-citation relationships are examined to evaluate the journal’s intellectual profile and scholarly influence. The findings indicate that Improving Schools has evolved into a broad, practice-oriented forum whose inclusive positioning has not consistently translated into consolidated lines of inquiry. The journal addresses a wide range of educational problems across diverse contexts, yet its citation profile remains modest and less consolidated than that of journals more firmly anchored in established disciplinary and school improvement research traditions. Topical analyses show that the journal is organized around school improvement as a broad, integrative construct rather than around clearly identifiable thematic clusters. Co-word and journal co-citation analyses situate Improving Schools within a diverse and weakly consolidated segment of the education literature, reflecting its bridging role across research- and practice-oriented traditions. The review concludes by reflecting on the implications of these patterns for readers, prospective authors, and editorial strategy as the journal seeks to strengthen integrative linkages within its distinctive improvement-oriented mission.
AinscowM. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: what are the levers for change?Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124.
2.
AinscowM.MuijsD.WestM. (2006). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9(3), 192–202.
3.
AldridgeJ. M.FraserB. J.FozdarF.Ala’iK.EarnestJ.AfariE. (2016). Students’ perceptions of school climate as determinants of wellbeing, resilience and identity. Improving Schools, 19(1), 5–26.
4.
ArmstrongP. (2015). Effective school partnerships and collaboration for school improvement: A review of the evidence. Department for Education, United Kingdom.
5.
AyayaG. I. (2021). Equipping students for leadership through community engagement. Improving Schools, 24(3), 277–292.
6.
BarthR. S. (1986). On sheep and goats and school reform. The Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), 293–296.
7.
BoikhutsoK. (2010). The theory into practice dilemma: Lesson planning challenges facing Botswana student-teachers. Improving Schools, 13(3), 205–220.
8.
BorgE.DrangeI. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration in school: Effects on teaching and learning. Improving Schools, 22(3), 251–266.
9.
BubbS.JonesM. A. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 home-schooling experience: Listening to pupils, parents/carers and teachers. Improving Schools, 23(3), 209–222.
10.
BuchananK.BuchananT. (2017). Relationships with families: Have educators overlooked a critical piece of the puzzle?Improving Schools, 20(3), 236–246.
11.
BzourM.ZukiF. M.MispanM. (2022). Causes and remedies for secondary school dropout in Palestine. Improving Schools, 25(1), 52–64.
12.
CaldwellB. J. (2000). Achieving successful leadership in schools of the third millennium. Improving Schools, 3(3), 20–26.
13.
CampbellR. F. (1979). A critique of the Educational Administration Quarterly. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 1–19.
14.
CoffeyA. (2013). Relationships: The key to successful transition from primary to secondary school?Improving Schools, 16(3), 261–271.
15.
CokerD. C. (2022). Playing charades: Failures, fads, and follies of school improvement plans. Education Leadership Review, 23(1), 75–104.
16.
DonthuN.KumarS.MukherjeeD.PandeyN.LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
17.
EdmondsR. (1982). On school improvement. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 13.
18.
EisnerE. (1998). What do the arts teach?Improving Schools, 1(3), 32–36.
19.
FeldhoffT.RadischF.BischofL. M. (2016). Designs and methods in school improvement research: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 209–240.
20.
FinlaysonM. (2014). Addressing math anxiety in the classroom. Improving Schools, 17(1), 99–115.
21.
FlecknoeàM. (2003). Why do parents choose small schools? A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 6(3), 45–60.
22.
FrenchR.ImmsW.MahatM. (2020). Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to innovative learning environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools, 23(2), 175–189.
23.
Garcia-HuidobroJ. C.NannemannA.BaconC. K.ThompsonK. (2017). Evolution in educational change: A literature review of the historical core of the Journal of Educational Change. Journal of Educational Change, 18(3), 263–293.
24.
HallingerP. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126–149.
25.
HallingerP. (2023a). An empirical reflection on educational administration quarterly’s distinctive contributions to the field, 1965–2020. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(5), 884–913.
26.
HallingerP. (2023b). Mapping the contributions of the review of educational research to education, 1931–2020. Review of Educational Research, 93(6), 791–824.
27.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
28.
HallingerP.KovačevićJ. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369.
29.
HallingerP.KovačevićJ. (2022). Mapping the intellectual lineage of educational management, administration and leadership, 1972–2020. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 192–216.
30.
HarrisA.JonesM. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172–181.
31.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229–244.
32.
HopkinsD.StringfieldS.HarrisA.StollL.MackayT. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281.
JäppinenA. K. (2012). Distributed pedagogical leadership in support of student transitions. Improving Schools, 15(1), 23–36.
35.
Jindal-SnapeD.FoggieJ. (2008). A holistic approach to primary—secondary transitions. Improving Schools, 11(1), 5–18.
36.
JohnsonN. J.ScullJ. (1999). The power of professional learning teams. Improving Schools, 2(1), 34–43.
37.
KokotsakiD.MenziesV.WigginsA. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277.
38.
KoutroubaK.KarageorgouE. (2013). Cognitive and socio-affective outcomes of project-based learning: Perceptions of Greek second chance school students. Improving Schools, 16(3), 244–260.
39.
KovačevićJ.HallingerP. (2020). Finding Europe’s niche: Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management in Europe, 1960–2018. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 405–425.
LeithwoodK. (2005). Understanding successful principal leadership: Progress on a broken front. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 619–629.
42.
LevineD. U. (1982). Successful approaches for improving academic achievement in inner-city elementary schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(8), 523–526.
43.
LevineT. H. (2011). Comparing approaches to converting large high schools into smaller units. Improving Schools, 14(2), 172–186.
44.
Loucks-HorsleyS.HergertL. F. (1985). An action guide to school improvement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
45.
MertlerC. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12(2), 101–113.
NtombelaS. (2011). The progress of inclusive education in South Africa: Teachers’ experiences in a selected district, KwaZulu-Natal. Improving Schools, 14(1), 5–14.
48.
OplatkaI. (2012). Fifty years of publication: Pondering the legacies of the Journal of Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 34–56.
49.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . . MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 74, 790–799.
50.
ReiersonC. A.BeckerS. R. (2021). Coherent school improvement: Integrating outcomes-based assessment and trauma-informed practice. Improving Schools, 24(2), 124–136.
RobinsonC.TaylorC. (2013). Student voice as a contested practice: Power and participation in two student voice projects. Improving Schools, 16(1), 32–46.
53.
RoyleP.KandalaN. B.BarnardK.WaughN. (2013). Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: Analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic Reviews, 2(1), 74.
54.
SaggersB. (2015). Student perceptions: Improving the educational experiences of high school students on the autism spectrum. Improving Schools, 18(1), 35–45.
55.
SaitoE.HangK. T. D. (2010). Echoing with the voices of victims: Reflection on Vietnamese lessons on the Japanese experiences of atomic bombs. Improving Schools, 13(3), 221–234.
56.
SeuringS.GoldS. (2012). Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management An International Journal, 17(5), 544–555.
TajikM. A. (2008). External change agents in developed and developing countries. Improving Schools, 11(3), 251–271.
60.
TomlinsonH. (1998). Advances in education administration, improving educational performance: Local and systemic reforms. School Leadership and Management, 18(4), 525.
61.
ToppingK. (2011). Primary–secondary transition: Differences between teachers’ and children’s perceptions. Improving Schools, 14(3), 268–285.
62.
TorresA. C.MourazA. (2022). High school students as researchers about their school: exploring its potential for choices and skills. Improving Schools, 25(2), 148–160.
63.
van EckN. J. (2011). Methodological advances in bibliometric mapping of science [Unpublished doctoral dissertartion, Erasmus University]. (No. EPS-2011-247-LIS).
64.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2016, September). VOSviewer manual. Leiden University.
65.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2023). VOSviewer software version 1.6.20. Leiden University.
66.
WangoG.GwiyoL. M. (2023). When death strikes early as often will: How counsellors and schools can support grieving pupils and students. Improving Schools, 26(1), 39–53.
67.
WangY.BowersA. J.FikisD. J. (2017). Automated text data mining analysis of five decades of educational leadership research literature: Probabilistic topic modeling of EAQ articles from 1965 to 2014. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 289–323.
68.
WoolnerP.HallE.WallK.DennisonD. (2007). Getting together to improve the school environment: User consultation, participatory design and student voice. Improving Schools, 10(3), 233–248.
69.
WoolnerP.McCarterS.WallK.HigginsS. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice?Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60.
70.
WrigleyT. (2001). School improvement- Which way forward?Improving Schools, 4(1), 1–2.
71.
WurdingerS.HaarJ.HuggR.BezonJ. (2007). A qualitative study using project-based learning in a mainstream middle school. Improving Schools, 10(2), 150–161.
72.
YanC. (2015). ‘We can’t change much unless the exams change’: Teachers’ dilemmas in the curriculum reform in China. Improving Schools, 18(1), 5–19.
73.
ZulfiqarA.SyedF. R.LatifF. F. (2019). Developing a student well-being model for schools in Pakistan. Improving Schools, 22(1), 86–108.
74.
ZupicI.ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
