Comparative standards of legal advice privilege for tax advisers and optimal reform proposals for English law

Abstract

The widely accepted rationale for legal advice privilege between client and lawyer applies equally to tax advisers giving their clients fiscal legal advice. This article undertakes a comprehensive comparative analysis of standards of legal advice privilege for tax advisers in the United States, New Zealand and Australia. It then reviews the current limited tax advisers’ privilege found in Sched. 36 to the Finance Act 2008. Based on evaluation of these comparative models, optimal proposals are made for a tax advisers’ privilege in English law.

Keywords

legal advice privilege non-disclosure right tax advice tax advisers’ privilege

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Law Reform Commission (2007) Privilege in Perspective: Client Legal Privilege in Federal Investigations. ALRC Report 107. Available at: http://www.alrc.gov.au/report-107

Australian Law Reform Commission (2011) ALRC Submission in Response to Discussion Paper on Privilege in Relation to Tax Advice. Available at: http://www.alrc.gov.au/alrc-submission-response-discussion-paper-privilege-relation-tax-advice

Australian Taxation Office (2010) Guidelines to accessing professional accounting advisors’ papers. Available at: https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Gen/Guidelines-to-accessing-professional-accounting-advisors--papers/ (accessed 1 October 2014).

Australian Taxation Office (2013) Our Approach to Information Gathering: Guide for Taxpayers. Available at: https://www.ato.gov.au/uploadedFiles/Content/CS_C/downloads/CSC_37592.pdf (accessed 10 June 2015).

Barsky

Catanach

Jr Lipin

. (2010) Protecting a client’s confidences: recent developments in privileged communication between attorneys and accountants. Journal of Law and Commerce 28: 211–237.

Bauman

Fowler

(2002) The expanded taxpayer confidentiality privilege: A review and assessment of IRC section 7525. Advances in Taxation 14: 37–64.

Blackhurst

(2014) ‘Aggressive’ tax avoidance? It’s time for politicians to stop offering soundbites and send out hefty bills. The Independent, 14 May. Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/chris-blackhurst-aggressive-tax-avoidance-its-time-for-politicians-to-stop-offering-soundbites-and-send-out-hefty-bills-9365594.html (accessed 10 June 2015).

Corcoran

(2000) The accountant-client privilege: A prescription for confidentiality or just a placebo? New England Law Review 34(3): 697–737.

Cummings

(2008) Globalization and the evisceration of the corporate attorney-client privilege: A re-examination of the privilege and a proposal for harmonization. Tennessee Law Review 76(1): 1–32.

10.

Department for Constitutional Affairs (2003) Government Conclusions, Competition and regulation in the legal services market—A report following the consultation ‘In the public interest?’ Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dca.gov.uk/consult/general/oftreptconc.htm

11.

Department of the Treasury (2011) Privilege in Relation to Tax Advice. Discussion Paper, April 2011. Available at: http://archive.treasury.gov.au/documents/2005/PDF/DP_Privilege_in_relation_%20to_tax_advice.pdf

12.

Gilleard

(2014) Ireland’s tax deals with Apple ‘constitute state aid’. Luxembourg’s Amazon arrangement also called into question. International Tax Review, October. Available at: http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/Article/3388130/Ireland-Archive/Irelands-tax-deals-with-Apple-constitute-state-aid-Luxembourgs-Amazon-arrangement-also-called-into.html (accessed 27 November 2014).

13.

Dixon

(2010) Legal professional privilege and advice from non-lawyers. British Tax Review 1: 83–101.

14.

Gillet

(2001) The federal tax practitioner-client privilege (I.R.C. section 7525): A shield to cloak confidential communication or a dagger for both the practitioner and the client? University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 70: 129.

15.

Glynn

(2002) Federalizing privilege. American University Law Review 52(1): 59–171.

16.

HMRC (2006) Criminal investigation policy. Available at: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/prosecutions/crim-inv-policy.htm (accessed 19 November 2014).

17.

HMRC (2013) Guidance—Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/341960/dotas-guidance.pdf

18.

Inland

Revenue

(2015) Approved advisor groups. Available at: http://www.ird.govt.nz/taxagents/role/advisor-groups/ (accessed 19 September 2014).

19.

Inland Revenue Department (2005) SPS 05/07 - Non-disclosure Right for Tax Advice Documents. Available at: http://www.ird.govt.nz/technical-tax/standard-practice/general/sps-gnl-0507-nondisc-rights.html

20.

Kalderimis

Dobson

(2011) The privilege of privilege. New Zealand Law Journal 2011(4): 82–84.

21.

Kendall

(2005) Prospects for a tax advisors’ privilege in Australia. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association 1(3): 46.

22.

Kendall

(2011) Designing privilege for the tax profession: Comparing I.R.C. § 7525 with New Zealand’s nondisclosure right. Houston Business and Tax Law Journal 11: 74–107.

23.

LeBlanc

(1999) Accountant-client privilege: The effect of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 67: 583.

24.

Lobenhofer

(2000) The new tax practitioner privilege: Limited privilege and significant disruption. Ohio Northern University Law Review 26: 243.

25.

Lord Chancellor’s Department (2002) In the Public Interest? A Consultation Following the Office of Fair Trading’s Report on Competition in the Professions. Consultation paper.

26.

Lord Chancellor’s Department (2003) Response to the Consultation Paper ‘In the public interest’.

27.

Loughrey

(2014a) Accountability and the regulation of the large law firm lawyer. Modern Law Review 77(5): 732–762.

28.

Loughrey

(2014b) An unsatisfactory stalemate: R (on the application of Prudential plc) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax . International Journal of Evidence & Proof 18(1): 65–77.

29.

Lynam

(2008) Why the work of in-house accountants is never subject to the tax-practitioner privilege of section 7525. Available at: http://www.tax-whistleblower.com/articles/why-the-work-of-in-house-accountants-is-never-subject-to-the-tax-practicioner-privilege-of-section-7525/ (accessed 6 October 2014).

30.

Maples

(2008) The non-disclosure right in New Zealand—lessons for Australia? Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association 1(3): 351.

31.

Maples

Blissenden

(2010) The proposed client-accountant tax privilege in Australia: How does it sit with the common law doctrine of legal professional privilege? Australian Tax Review 39: 20.

32.

Maples

Woellner

(2010) Privilege for accountants’ tax advice in Australia—Brave new world, or house of straw? Australian Tax Forum 25: 143.

33.

Mata

Smith

(2012) Demystifying accountant-client privileges in state tax litigation. State Tax Notes April: 41–48.

34.

New Zealand Law Commission (2000) Tax and Privilege: Legal Professional Privilege and the Commissioner of Inland Revenue’s Powers to Obtain Information. Report 67. Wellington: Law Commission. Available at: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R67/R67.pdf

35.

Petroni

(1999) Unpacking the accountant-client privilege under I.R.C. section 7525. Virginia Tax Review 18: 843.

36.

Policy Advice Division of the Inland Revenue Department (2002) Tax and Privilege: A proposed new structure: a government discussion document.

37.

Regan

(2013) Tax advisors and conflicted citizens. Legal Ethics 16(2): 322.

38.

Rostain

(2006) Sheltering lawyers: The organized tax bar and the tax shelter industry. Yale Journal on Regulation 23: 77.

39.

Tax Practitioners Board (2014) Registration exemptions for tax and BAS agents. Available at: http://www.tpb.gov.au/TPB/Register/0438_Registration_exemptions.aspx (accessed 1 October 2014).

40.

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (2011) Response to Discussion Paper on Privilege in Relation to Tax Advice. Available at: http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/Industry-Topics/Tax/Exposure-drafts-and-submissions/Submissions/Treasury/08-08-11-Submission-on-Privilege-in-relation-to-tax-advice-discussion-paper.aspx (accessed 10 June 2015).

41.

Wilson-Rogers

Morgan

Pinto

(2014) The primacy of client privilege: Designing a statutory advice privilege for accredited non-lawyer tax advisors. Australian Tax Forum. Available at: http://docs.business.auckland.ac.nz/Doc/46-Nicole-Wilson-Rogers-Annette-Morgan-Dale-Pinto-paper.pdf (accessed 1 October 2014).