In this paper we investigate language contact between Haitian Creole and Dominican Spanish. We focus particularly on the acquisition of clitic pronouns (dative and accusative) in relation to their morpho-syntactic properties in the interlanguage of L2 Spanish speakers (Haitians and their bilingual descendants, whose first language is Creole) and we compare them with bilingual speakers of Creole and Spanish (Dominican-Haitians and Arayanos) and monolingual Spanish speakers (Dominicans), residents near the Dominican-Haitian border. Although the acquisition of clitic pronouns of L2 Spanish has been the object of multiple studies (Montrul, 2004; Sánchez, 2004), no study to date has referred to the case of native speakers of a Creole language, in this case of Haitian Creole. In Spanish, clitics can be heads of their own functional categories (AgrOP and AgrIOP) (Franco, 1993; Uriagereka, 1995), while acting as affixes of morphological agreement. For the purposes of this paper, we interviewed (semi) spontaneously, 11 informants, belonging to three groups of border speakers, whom we classified according to the variables of ethnicity and degree of bilingualism: 5 Haitians (Hs), 3 Arayanos (AYs) and 3 Dominicans (Ds); these latter were monolingual non-standard Spanish speakers that formed the control group. According to the results, there are significant differences or cases of divergence between the properties of the participants' grammar that could be due to the properties of their L1. The differences occur fundamentally in speakers of interlanguage, in relation to morphology (i.e. agreement — gender and number), rather than syntax. In the light of these results, it could be argued that Creole speakers with Spanish as an interlanguage do not seem to converge with monolingual speakers in their morpho-syntactic terms of the object pronouns (i.e. clitics), or they simply display an `'incomplete'' grammar.
Appel, R., & Muysken, P. (1987). Language contact and bilingualism. London: Arnold.
2.
Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized verb movement: Aspects of verb syntax . Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier .
3.
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht : Foris Publications.
4.
Bruhn DEGaravito, J., & Montrul, S. (1996). Verb movement and clitic placement in French and Spanish as a second language. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.123-134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
5.
Camacho, J., & Sánchez, L. (2002). Explaining clitic variation in Spanish. In M. Amberber & P. Collins (Eds.), Formal approaches to language universals and language variation (pp.21-40). New Jersey: Ablex.
6.
Campos, H. (1986). Indefinite object drop. Linguistic Inquiry17, 354-359.
7.
Cardinalleti, A. (1994). On the internal structure of pronominal DPs. Linguistic Review11, 195-219.
8.
Castor, S. (1987). Migración y relaciones internacionales (el caso haitiano-dominicano). Santo Domingo: Editorial Universitaria UASD.
9.
Choi, J. (2000). [-Person] direct drop: The genetic cause of a syntactic feature in Paraguayan Spanish. Hispania83, 531-543.
10.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
11.
DeGraff, M. (1990). Is Haitian Creole a pro-drop language?Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien, 11, 1-22.
12.
DeGraff, M. (1993). Is Haitian Creole a pro-drop language? In F. Byrne and J. Holm (Eds.), Atlantic meets pacific (Creole Language Library 11) (pp.71-90). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13.
Deprez, V. (1992). Is the Haitian Creole really a pro drop language?Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien, 11, 23-4.
14.
Domïnguez, L. (2003). Interpreting reference in the early acquisition of Spanish clitics. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp.212-228). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
15.
Duffield, N., & White, L. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: Convergent methodologies. Second Language Research, 15, 133-160.
16.
Einsenchlas, S. (1994). A case study of first language Spanish-English bilingual acquisition. MA Thesis, University of Queensland .
17.
Einsenchlas, S. (2003). Clitics in Spanish. First Language , 23, 193-211.
18.
Ezeizabarrena, M.-J. (1996). Adquisición de la morfología verbal en euskera y castellano por niños bilingües. Vitoria: Servicio Editorial del País Vasco.
19.
Fernández Ordoñez, I. (1999). Leísmo, laísmo, loísmo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Volumen 1: Sintaxis básica de las clases de palabras (pp.1317-1398). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
20.
Franco, J. (1993). On object agreement in Spanish. Doctoral Dissertation . University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
21.
Fujino, H., & Sano, T. (2000). Some notes on the null object phenomenon in child Spanish. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (pp.308-318). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
22.
Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language78, 482-526.
23.
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The `failed functional features hypothesis' . Second Language Research, 13, 187-226.
24.
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22, 269-301.
25.
Huang, J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns . Linguistic Inquiry15, 531-574.
26.
Hulk, A. (1986). Subject clitics and the PRO-drop parameter. In P. Coopmans, I. Bordelois & B. Smith (Eds.), Formal parameters of generative grammar (pp.107-120). Dorchecht: ICG Printing.
27.
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
28.
Jaeggli, O. (1984). Subject extraction and the null subject parameter . In C. Jones & P. Sells (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14 (pp.132-153). University of Massachussets at Amherst, GLSA.
29.
Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in the fossilized steady state . Second Language Research14, 1-26.
30.
Lardiere, D. (1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research14, 359-375.
31.
Lardiere, D. (2005). On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, Rex Spouse & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approach to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp.178-192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
32.
Law, P. ( 1992). What is a null subject language?Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien, 11, 41-58.
33.
Lefebvre, C. (1998). Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Liceras, J. (1985). The value of clitics in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 1, 151-168.
35.
Lipski, J. (1994). Latin American Spanish. London : Longman.
36.
Lipski, J. (2005). A history of Afro-Hispanic language contact: Five centuries and five continents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
López Ornat, S., Mariscal, S., Gallo, P., & Fernández, A. (1994). Pequeños problemas y grandes problemas de la codificación . In S. López Ornat, La adquisición de la lengua española , (pp.13-28). Madrid: SigloXXI.
38.
Montrul, S. (1999). Activating AgrIOP in second language acquisition . In E. Klein & G. Matohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars. A generative approach (pp.81-108). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
39.
Montrul, S. (2004). The acquisition of Spanish. The morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40.
Muysken, P. & Law, P. (2001). Creole studies. A theoretical linguist's field guide. Glot International, 5, 47-57.
41.
Ocampo, F., & Klee, C. (1995). Spanish OV/VO word order variation in Spanish-Quechua bilingual speakers. In S. Corvalán (Ed.), Spanish in four continents. Studies in language contact and bilingualism (pp.70-82). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
42.
Ortiz López, L. (2001a). El sistema verbal del español hatiano en Cuba: implicaciones para las lenguas en contacto en el Caribe. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 20(2), 175-192.
43.
Ortiz López, L. (2001b). Contacto lingüístico en la frontera domínico-haitiana: hallazgos preliminares de un proyecto en marcha. Anuario 1, Centro de Altos Estudios Humanísticos y del Idioma Español, Santo Domingo, 327-356.
44.
Ortiz López, L. (2006). Spanish as L2 on the Dominican/Haitian border and universal processes of acquisition. In C. Molinero & M. Stewart (Eds.), Language and globalisation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
Ortiz López, L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Objetos directos (nulos) en la frontera dominico-haitiana: ¿contacto de lenguas o motivaciones internas?Spanish in Context, 5(1), 110-141.
46.
Paredes, L. (1996). The Spanish continuum in Peruvian bilingual speakers: A study of verbal clitic. PhD dissertation, USC.
47.
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from Tense and Agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 110-133.
48.
Reglero, L., & Ticio, E. (2003). The acquisition of clitics in child Spanish. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp.297-316). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
49.
Roberge, Y.1990. The syntax recoverability of null arguments. Kingston: McGill Queen's University Press .
50.
Sánchez, L. (1999). Null object in contact varieties of Spanish. In J. M. Authier, L. Reed & B. Bullock (Eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics (pp.227-242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
51.
Sánchez, L. (2004): `Null subjects and agreement in Shipibo Spanish' . Paper presented at the 21st Conference on Spanish in the USA, Arlington, Virginia.
52.
Schwenter, S. (2006). Null objects across South America. In T. L. Face & C. Klee (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.23-36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
53.
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1990). Current issues in studies of language contact . Hispania, 73, 162-176.
54.
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1993). On the permeability of grammars: Evidence from Spanish and English contact. In W. Ashby , M. Mithum, G. Perissimoto & E. Raposo (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on the Romance languages (pp.19-43). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
55.
Thomason, S.G. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
56.
Thomason, S.G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics . Berkeley: University of California Press.
57.
Torrens, V., & Wexler, K. (1996). Clitic-doubling in early Spanish. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (pp.780-791). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
58.
Tsimpli, I.-M. (2003). Features in language development. Paper presented at the Eurosla conference, University of Edinburgh.
59.
Uriagereka, J. (1992). Extraction parameters: A case study on underspecification. Unpublished MS, University of Maryland.
60.
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79-123.
61.
Yépez, M. (1986). Direct object clitics in Quiteño Spanish. MA thesis , Cornell University.
62.
Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
