Contributions of internal and external factors to bilingual development: Evidence from Kurdish-English adolescents

Abstract

Aims:

This study examined the role of internal and external factors in bilingual language outcomes in a societal/first language (L1) and minority/foreign language (FL) context.

Methodology:

Participants were 98 Kurdish-English adolescents, living in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The data collected through a detailed questionnaire and a battery of standardized and researcher-developed measures.

Data and analysis:

Data were analyzed using backward regression and hierarchical regression models.

Findings:

Richness of the Kurdish and English environment contributed to language outcomes, of which parental Kurdish proficiency, Kurdish input from media, and paternal English proficiency were the best predictors of greater Kurdish morphosyntactic knowledge and faster lexical access ability in Kurdish and English. Cognitive and age factors predicted language outcomes, of which nonverbal analytic reasoning and older age of English exposure were the best predictors of greater English morphosyntactic knowledge and larger vocabulary size in both languages. As two different sets, external factors outweighed internal factors in terms of vocabulary size and lexical access abilities in both languages as well as Kurdish morphosyntax. The contribution of two sets was alike for English morphosyntax.

Conclusions:

Sensitivity to variation in individual difference factors varies depending on the linguistic domains. External factors are more essential for bilingual development, but at the same time, the role of internal factors in dual language learning should not be underestimated.

Originality:

With valuable insights offered by previous research, this study contributes to the field of bilingual development through examining a large number of individual difference factors in one of the most under-studied bilingual populations.

Keywords

Bilingual development internal and external factors morphosyntax vocabulary size lexical access Kurdish-English bilingual adolescents

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulrahman

Hassani

Ahmadi

(2019). Developing a fine-grained corpus for a less-resourced language: The case of Kurdish. arxiv. https://arxiv.1909.11467v1

Anthony

(2022). AntConc (Version 4.0.5) [Computer software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Blom

(2010). Effects of input on the early grammatical development of bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(4), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910370917

Blom

Bosma

(2016). The sooner the better? An investigation into the role of age of onset and its relation with transfer and exposure in bilingual Frisian-Dutch children. Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 581–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000574

Bohman

T. M.

Bedore

L. M.

Peña

E. D.

Mendez-Perez

Gillam

R. B.

(2010). What you hear and what you say: Language performance in Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903342019

Butler

(2014). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Research Papers in Education, 29(4).

Carroll

J. B.

Sapon

(1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT). Psychological Corporation.

Chondrogianni

Marinis

(2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, morphology and complex syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.05cho

Dąbrowska

(2016). Cognitive linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0059

10.

DeKeyser

R. M.

(2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/44486933

11.

DeKeyser

R. M.

(2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(S1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00238333.2005.00294.x

12.

DeKeyser

R. M.

(2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63(Supplement1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00737.x

13.

De Wilde

Brysbaert

Eyckmans

(2019). Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001062

14.

Dicataldo

Roch

(2020). Are the effects of variation in quantity of daily bilingual exposure and socioeconomic status on language and cognitive abilities independent in preschool children? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124570

15.

Dixon

L. Q.

Zhao

Quiroz

B. G.

Shin

J.-Y.

(2012). Home and community factors influencing bilingual children’s ethnic language vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911429527

16.

Fitzgerald

Stenner

A. J.

Sanford-Moore

E. E.

Koons

Bowen

Kim

K. H.

(2015). The relationship of Korean students’ age and years of English-as-a-foreign-language exposure with English reading ability: A cross-age study. Reading Psychology, 36(2), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.843063

17.

Flege

J. E.

Yeni-Komshian

G. H.

Liu

(1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2638

18.

García Mayo

M. P.

García Lecumberri

M. L.

(2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Multilingual Matters.

19.

Gathercole

V. M.

(2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morphosyntactic development in bilingual children. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 224–247. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb442.0

20.

Gutiérrez-Clellen

Kreiter

(2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0142716403000158

21.

Højen

Hoff

Bleses

Dale

(2021). The relation of home literacy environments to language and preliteracy skills in single- and dual-language children in Danish childcare. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.007

22.

Haig

Matras

(2002). Kurdish linguistics: A brief overview. STUF—Language Typology and Universals, 55(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2002.55.1.3

23.

Hellman

A. B.

(2011). Vocabulary size and depth of word knowledge in adult-onset second language acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00265.x

24.

Hintz

Jongman

Dijkhuis

van’t Hoff

McQueen

Meyer

(2020). Shared lexical access processes in speaking and listening? An individual differences study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(6), 1048–1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000768

25.

Huang

B. H.

Chang

Y.-H. S.

Zhi

Niu

(2020). The effect of input on bilingual adolescents’ long-term language outcomes in a foreign language instruction context. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768311

26.

Jia

Aaronson

(2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000079

27.

Jia

Fuse

(2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1280–1299. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/090)

28.

Johnson

J. S.

Newport

E. L.

(1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.

29.

Karimi

(2014). On the syntax of ergativity in Kurdish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 50(3), 231–271. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0016

30.

Krause

Bosch

Clahsen

(2015). Morphosyntax in the bilingual mental lexicon: An experimental study of strong stems in German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000564

31.

Kuo

L.-J.

Y.-M.

Chen

Gezer

M. Ü

. (2020). The relationship between input and literacy and metalinguistic development: A study with Chinese-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768312

32.

Lauro

J. G.

Core

Hoff

(2020). Explaining individual differences in trajectories of simultaneous bilingual development: Contributions of child and environmental factors. Child Development, 91(6), 2063–2082. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13409

33.

Malmasi

(2016). Subdialectal differences in Sorani Kurdish. In Nakov

Zampieri

Tan

Ljubesic

Tiedemann

Malmasi

(Eds.), Proceedings of the third workshop on NLP for similar languages, varieties and dialects (pp. 89-96). COLING Osaka.

34.

Meakins

Wigglesworth

(2013). How much input is enough? Correlating comprehension and child language input in an endangered language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.733010

35.

Meara

(2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Lognostics.

36.

Meara

Milton

(2003). X-Lex. The Swansea levels test. Express Publishing.

37.

Mofty

(1997). Easy way to Kurdish: A mini course. Audio-Forum.

38.

Mora

J. C.

(2006). Age effects on oral fluency development. In Muñoz

(Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 65-88). Multilingual Matters.

39.

Muñoz

(2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm056

40.

Muñoz

(2011). Input and long-term effects of starting age in foreign language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.006

41.

Muñoz

(2014). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu024

42.

Muñoz

Singleton

(2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000327

43.

Paradis

(2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.01par

44.

Paradis

Grüter

(2014). Introduction. In Grüter

Paradis

(Eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

45.

Paradis

(2019). English second language acquisition from early childhood to adulthood: The role of age, first language, cognitive and input factors. In Brown

Dailey

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Boston university conference on language development (pp. 11-26). Cascadilla Press.

46.

Paradis

Jia

(2017). Bilingual children's long-term outcomes in English as a second language: language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12433

47.

Paradis

Soto-Corominas

Chen

Gottardo

(2020). How language environment, age, and cognitive capacity support the bilingual development of Syrian refugee children recently arrived in Canada. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(6), 1255–1281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271642000017X

48.

Paradis

Soto-Corominas

Daskalaki

Chen

Gottardo

(2021). Morphosyntactic development in first generation Arabic-English children: The effect of cognitive, age, and input factors over time and across languages. Languages, 6(1), 51. https://dx-doi-org-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3390/languages6010051

49.

Pearson

(2007). Social factors in childhood bilingualism in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707021X

50.

Peirce

J. W.

Gray

J. R.

Simpson

MacAskill

M. R.

Höchenberger

Sogo

Kastman

Lindeløv

(2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y

51.

Pfenninger

Singleton

(2018). Starting age overshadowed: The primacy of differential environmental and family support effects on second language attainment in an instructional context. Language Learning, 69(S1), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12318

52.

Pham

Tipton

(2018). Internal and external factors that support children’s minority first language and English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 595–606.

53.

Piske

Young-Scholten

(2009). Introduction. In Piske

Young-Scholten

(Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 1-28). Multilingual Matters.

54.

Place

Hoff

(2016). Effects and noneffects of input in bilingual environments on dual language skills in 2½-year-olds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000322

55.

Quick

A. E.

Backus

(2022). A usage-based approach to pattern finding: The traceback method meets code-mixing. Languages, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020135

56.

Raven

J. C.

Court

J. H.

(1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 2: The coloured progressive matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press/The Psychological Corporation.

57.

Raven

J. C.

Court

J. H.

(2000). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 3: The standard progressive matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press/The Psychological Corporation.

58.

Rogers

V. E.

Meara

Barnett-Legh

Curry

Davie

(2017). Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests. JESLA, 1(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.24

59.

Rojas

Iglesias

Bunta

Goldstein

Goldenberg

Reese

(2016). Interlocutor differential effects on the expressive language skills of Spanish-speaking English learners. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1081290

60.

Salih

(2014). A comparative study of English and Kurdish connectives in newspaper opinion articles [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester]. Leicester Research Archive. https://leicester.figshare.com/account/articles/10159586

61.

Schulz

Grimm

(2019). The age factor revisited: Timing in acquisition interacts with age of onset in bilingual acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732

62.

Snodgrass

J. G.

Vanderwart

(1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.

63.

Sorenson Duncan

Paradis

(2020). Home language environment and children's second language acquisition: The special status of input from older siblings. Journal of Child Language, 47(5), 982–1005. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000977

64.

Sun

Yin

Amsah

O’brien

. (2018). Differential effects of internal and external factors in early bilingual vocabulary learning: The case of Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(2), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641700039X

65.

Tan

(2012). Age as a factor in ethnic accent identification in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(6), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.682730

66.

Unsworth

(2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000284

67.

Unsworth

Brouwer

De Bree

Verhagen

(2019). Predicting bilingual preschoolers’ patterns of language development: Degree of non-native input matters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(5), 1189–1219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000225

68.

Van Assche

Brysbaert

Duyck

. (2020). Bilingual lexical access. In Heredia

R. R.

Cieślicka

A. B.

(Eds.), Bilingual lexical ambiguity resolution (pp. 42-67) Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535967.004

69.

Verhagen

Kuiken

Andringa

(2022). Family language patterns in bilingual families and relationships with children’s language outcomes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(5), 1109–1139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000297

70.

Xue

Yan

Wang

Chen

(2021). Onset age of language acquisition effects in a foreign language context: Evidence from Chinese–English bilingual children. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-01909637-y