The role of language use and attitudes on language maintenance and heritage identity: The situation of the Hemshin language in Türkiye

Abstract

Aims and objectives:

This study aims to uncover the impact of language use and attitudes of Hemshin people living in the eastern Black Sea region in Türkiye on language maintenance and heritage identity.

Methodology:

This study utilized an ethnographic approach to fieldwork. Interviews were conducted with two groups of participants (n = 60) between 2017 and 2021. The participants included speech community members living in Hopa and heritage community members living in Çamlıhemşin and Hemşin.

Data and Analysis:

Data was collected through a direct approach, including face-to-face interviews, participant observation, and a field diary, and analyzed via a multiphase content analysis method.

Findings:

Participants in the speech community displayed positive attitudes toward Hemshin, yet a language shift toward Turkish was noted, particularly among third-generation speakers. Moreover, Hemshin people across three districts demonstrated a strong sense of belonging to their Hemshin identity through language use (in Hopa) and cultural preservation activities (in Çamlıhemşin and Hemşin). Both speech and heritage community members identified themselves as unique ethnic groups of Hemshin people.

Originality:

Few studies are engaged in the Hemshin community in the eastern Black Sea region regarding their language use, attitudes, and maintenance. Unlike most language studies that focus on speech communities, this study includes participants from both the speech and heritage communities and thus provides comprehensive insights into language maintenance and loss as well as the language identity of the communities.

Significance:

This study emphasizes that ethnic identity is defined not only by language but also by shared history and culture. Despite not speaking Hemshin, participants from heritage communities exhibit positive attitudes toward their ethnic identity, suggesting that ethnic identity can persist despite language loss. This study contributes to understanding the Hemshin language as an endangered minority language and other endangered languages and raises awareness concerning the protection of these languages.

Keywords

Hemshin endangered minority language language use language attitudes ethnolinguistic identity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aslan

(2006). Hemşinlilerde Sosyal Yapı ve Kültürel Kimlik (MA thesis). Istanbul University, Istanbul.

Austin

P. K.

Sallabank

(2011). The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press.

Backus

(2005). Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3&4), 307–340.

Bläsıng

(2007). Armenian in the vocabulary and culture of the Turkish Hemshinli. In Simonian

H. H.

(Ed.) The Hemshin: History, society and identity in the Highlands of Northeast Turkey (pp. 279–302).

Bourhis

R. Y.

Sachdev

(1984). Vitality perceptions and language attitudes: Some Canadian data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3(2), 97–126.

Brown

C. L.

(2011). Maintaining heritage language: Perspectives of Korean parents. Multicultural Education, 19(1), 31–37.

Bucholtz

Hall

(2004). Language and identity. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 1, 369–394.

Canagarajah

(2013). Reconstructing heritage language: Resolving dilemmas in language maintenance for Sri Lankan Tamil migrants. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 2013(222), 131–155.

Garibova

Zeynalov

(2023). Language change, language attrition and ethnolinguistic vitality of Khinalug in Azerbaijan: Is the quietly approaching threat reversible? JofEL/TDD, 13(22).

10.

Garner

(1986). The Swedish and Russian Speech Communities in Melbourne in the Context of Developing a Theory of the Ecology of Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.

11.

Garner

(1988). Ethnic languages in two small communities: Swedish and Russian in Melbourne. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 72, 37–50.

12.

Giles

Bourhis

R. Y.

Taylor

D. M.

(1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Giles

(Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). Academic Press.

13.

Giles

Johnson

(1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69–100.

14.

Giles

Rosenthal

Young

(1985). Perceived ethnolinguistic vitality: The Anglo and Greek-Australian setting. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6(3, 4), 253–269.

15.

Hamers

J. F.

Blanc

M. H. A.

(2004). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge University Press.

16.

Haugen

(1972). The ecology of language. In Dil

A. S.

(Ed.), The ecology of language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford University Press.

17.

Hinton

(2011). Revitalization of endangered languages. In Austin

P.K

Sallabank

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages (pp. 291–311). Cambridge University Press.

18.

Kırzıoğlu

M. F.

(1966). Eski Oğuz (Arsaklı-Part) Kalıntısı Hemşinliler. Türk Folklor Araştırmaları.

19.

Liebkind

(2006). Ethnicidentity in acculturation. In Sam

D. L.

Bery

J. W.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation (pp. 78–96). Cambridge University Press.

20.

Lieblich

Tuval-Mashiach

Zilber

(1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation (Vol. 47). Sage.

21.

MacKinnon

(2010). Growing a new generation of Gaelic speakers: An action plan in response to a ministerial initiative. In Lewis

Ostler

(Eds.), Reversing language shift: How to re-awaken a language tradition [Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Foundation for Endangered Languages, University of Wales Trinity St David, Carmarthen, Wales, 13 September 2010] (pp. 63–67). Foundation for Endangered Languages.

22.

Melo-Pfeifer

(2015). The role of the family in heritage language use and learning: Impact on heritage language policies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(1), 26–44.

23.

Moseley

(2010). Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. Third Edition. Paris: UNESCO. Online version. Retrieved September 14, 2015. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-toknowledge/linguistic-diversity-and-multilingualism-on-internet/atlas-oflanguages-in-danger/

24.

O’Shannessy

(2011). Language contact and change in endangered languages. In Austin

P. K

Sallabank

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages (pp. 78–99). Cambridge University Press.

25.

Özsoy

A. S.

Taylan

E. E.

(2000). Türkçe’nin Ağızları Çalışmalarında Yöntem Sorunları. In Özsoy

A. Sumru

Taylan

Eser. E.

(Eds.), Türkçe’nin Ağızları Çalıştay (pp. 27–33). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.

26.

Pavlenko

(2002). Bilingualism and emotions. Multilingua, 21(1), 45–78.

27.

Phinney

J. S.

(1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156–176.

28.

Riessman

C. K.

(2016). What’s different about narrative inquiry? Cases categories and contexts. In Silverman

(Ed.), Qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 363–378). Sage.

29.

Sallabank

(2013). Can majority support save an endangered language? A case study of language attitudes in Guernsey. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(4), 332–347.

30.

Sánchez

Mayer

Camacho

Alzza

C. R.

(2018). Linguistic attitudes toward Shipibo in Cantagallo: Reshaping indigenous language and identity in an urban setting. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(4), 466–487.

31.

Saville-Troike

(2003). The ethnography of communication. Blackwell Publishing.

32.

Schreiber

Sitaridou

(2018). Assessing sociolinguistic vitality: An attitudinal study of Rumca (Romeyka). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(1), 1–16.

33.

Tabouret-Keller

(1997). Language and identity. In Coulmas

(Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 315–326). Blackwell Publishers.

34.

Tulloch

(2004). Inuktitut and Inuit youth: Language attitudes as a basis for language planning (PhD dissertation, Université Laval).

35.

Vaux

(2007). Homshetsma: The language of the Armenians of Hamshen. In Simonian

H. H.

(Ed.), The Hemshin: History, society and identity in the Highlands of Northeast Turkey (pp. 353–388). Routledge.

36.

Vaux

LaPorta

Tucker

(1996). Ethnographic materials from the Muslim Hemshinli. Annual of Armenian Linguistics, 17.

37.

Yim

Clément

(2021). Acculturation and attitudes toward code-switching: A bidimensional framework. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(5), 1369–1388.