The influence of speech formulation and articulation on language switch costs

Abstract

Aims and objectives:

This empirical study aimed to investigate which process of speech production, particularly formulation and articulation, plays a crucial role in the occurrence of language switch costs (i.e., slower and/or impaired performance when switching to another language).

Methodology:

To dissociate the roles of formulation and articulation, we employed a cued language-switching task, in which long or short signals were manipulated to ensure complete or incomplete involvement of the formulation process, and Go or Nogo signals to indicate articulation or no-articulation.

Data and analysis:

Data were gathered from two groups of Chinese-English bilingual university students differing in L2 proficiency. An ANOVA analysis was performed, incorporating the formulation/articulation status of the preceding trial, the bilinguals’ L2 proficiency, and the direction of language switching.

Findings:

Only when the preceding trial was articulated that language switch costs were observed in the current articulation trial, and switching to L1 incurs larger costs than switching to L2 (i.e., asymmetric switch costs typically found in the literature). When the preceding trial was not articulated, however, repeating in L1 incurs larger costs than repeating in L2, which can be referred to as asymmetric rearticulation costs.

Originality:

This study manipulated L2 proficiency and considered the factors of cognate status and language families, and yet the main findings about language switch costs remained the same as those revealed by Philipp and Koch. Moreover, it is the first time when asymmetric rearticulation costs were observed, reinforcing the critical role of articulation in language switch costs.

Significance:

With language switch costs replicated in a more diverse context, and with the novel finding of asymmetric rearticulation costs, the critical role of articulation was consistently revealed in language switch costs and probably, in language production.

Keywords

Speech production bilingual language control language switch cost articulation speech formulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Calabria

Hernández

Branzi

F. M.

Costa

(2012). Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: Evidence from task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00399

Chen

Zhang

Yuan

Guo

(2021). Language switching training modulates the neural network of non-linguistic cognitive control. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0247100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247100

Christoﬀels

I. K.

Firk

Schiller

N. O.

(2007). Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.137

Colome

(2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production: Language-specific or language-independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2793

Costa

Caramazza

Sebastian-Gallés

(2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for the models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283–1296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1283

Costa

Miozzo

Caramazza

(1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2651

Costa

Santesteban

(2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002

Costa

Santesteban

Caño

(2005). On the facilitatory eﬀects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.002

Costa

Santesteban

Ivanova

(2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1057

10.

Cui

Zhang

(2010). Han-Ying Shuangyuzhe Yanyu Liji zhong Yuma Qiehuan de Jizhi-Laizi Yacihui Shuiping de Zhengju [The mechanism of language switching in language comprehension: Evidence from the sub-lexical level] (in Chinese). Xili Xuebao /Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(2), 173–184. https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/Y2010/V42/I02/173

11.

Declerck

Grainger

Koch

Philipp

A. M.

(2017). Is language control just a form of executive control? Evidence for overlapping processes in language switching and task switching. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.005

12.

Declerck

Koch

J. A.

Duñabeitia Grainger

Stephan

D. N.

(2019). What absent switch costs and mixing costs during bilingual language comprehension can tell us about language control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(6), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000627

13.

Declerck

Meade

Midgley

K. J.

Holcomb

P. J.

Roelofs

Emmorey

(2021). On the connection between language control and executive control—An ERP study. Neurobiology of Language, 2(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00032

14.

Declerck

Philipp

A. M.

(2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1630–1645. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1

15.

Dong

Gui

Macwhinney

(2005). Shared and separate meanings in the bilingual mental lexicon. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 8(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728905002270

16.

Eimer

(1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychology, 35(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(93)90009-w

17.

Enriquez-Geppert

Konrad

Pantev

Huster

R. J.

(2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined Go/Nogo and stop-signal task. Neuroimage, 51(2), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043

18.

Garrett

M. F.

(1975). The analysis of sentence production. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 9, 133–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60270-4

19.

Garrett

M. F.

(1976). Syntactic processes in sentence production. New Approaches to Language Mechanisms, 30, 231–256.

20.

Goldrick

Putnam

M. T.

Schwarz

(2019). The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(6), 1107–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000633

21.

Gollan

T. H.

Goldrick

(2016). Grammatical constraints on language switching: Language control is not just executive control. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.002

22.

Gollan

T. H.

Sandoval

Salmon

D. P.

(2011). Cross-language intrusion errors in aging bilinguals reveal the link between executive control and language selection. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417002

23.

Gollan

T. H.

Schotter

E. R.

Gomez

Murillo

Rayner

(2014). Multiple levels of bilingual control: Evidence from language intrusions in reading aloud. Psychological Science, 25(2), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512661

24.

Grainger

Midgley

Holcomb

P. J.

(2010). Re-thinking the bilingual interactive activation model from a developmental perspective (BIA-d). In Michèle

Maya

(Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp. 267–283). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.18gra

25.

Green

(1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(02), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728998000133

26.

Heisler

Goffman

Younger

(2010). Articulatory interactions in children’s language production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 1176–1186. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0123)

27.

Hermans

Bongaerts

De Bot

Schreuder

(1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728998000364

28.

Indefrey

Levelt

W. J.

(2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001

29.

Kroll

Stewart

(1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008

30.

Levelt

W. J. M.

(1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.

31.

Levelt

W. J. M.

(1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(1–3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-j

32.

Liu

de Bruin

(2021). Should I focus on self-language actions or should I follow others? Cross-language interference effects in voluntary and cued language switching. Acta Psychologica, 216, 103308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103308

33.

Guo

(2016). Reactive and proactive control in bilingual word production: An investigation of influential factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.004

34.

Meuter

R. F. I.

Allport

(1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2602

35.

Munhall

K. G.

(2001). Functional imaging during speech production. Acta Psychologica, 107(1–3), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00026-9

36.

Peeters

Runnqvist

Bertrand

Grainger

(2014). Asymmetrical switch costs in bilingual language production induced by reading words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034060

37.

Philipp

A. M.

Jolicoeur

Falkenstein

Koch

(2007). Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1062

38.

Philipp

A. M.

Koch

(2016). Action speaks louder than words, even in speaking. In Schwieter

J. W.

(Ed.), Cognitive control and consequences of multilingualism (pp. 127–144). John Benjamins.

39.

Poulisse

Bongaerts

(1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.1.36

40.

Reynolds

M. G.

Schlöffel

Peressotti

(2016). Asymmetric switch costs in numeral naming and number word reading: Implications for models of bilingual language production. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02011

41.

Schotter

E. R.

Gollan

T. H.

(2019). What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(8), 2032–2045. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818819480

42.

Schuch

Koch

(2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.92

43.

Slevc

L. R.

Davey

N. S.

Linck

J. A.

(2016). A new look at “the hard problem” of bilingual lexical access: Evidence for language-switch costs with univalent stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1152274

44.

Verbruggen

Liefooghe

Szmalec

Vandierendonck

(2005). Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter? Experimental Psychology, 52(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.125

45.

Verhoef

Roelofs

Chwilla

D. J.

(2009). Role of inhibition in language switching: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in overt picture naming. Cognition, 110(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.013

46.

Zhang

Wang

(2012). Shulian Han-Ying Shuangyuzhe de Yuma Qiehuan Jizhi—Laizi Duanyu Shuiping de Zhengju [The proficient Chinese-English bilinguals’ mechanism of language switching in phrase level] (in Chinese). Xinli Xuebao/Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00166

47.

Zhu

Damian

Zhang

(2015). Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 144, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007

48.

Zhu

Damian

Zhang

(2016). Additivity of semantic and phonological effects: Evidence from speech production in Mandarin. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2285–2304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1129427