The role of satisfaction with social support in perceived burden and stress of parents of six-month-old infants with a congenital anomaly

Abstract

This exploratory study examined the role of satisfaction with support from family and friends on the burden and stress of parents of infants with a congenital anomaly (CA). The effects of social support were examined within the couple (actor and partner effects). A total of 36 couples whose six-month-old infant has a CA participated in this study. The parents completed questionnaires regarding satisfaction with support, burden (Impact on Family Scale – Revised), and parenting stress (Parenting Stress Index). The results showed that fathers directly benefited from the support they received from friends in reducing their burden, while mothers only indirectly benefited from it through the father’s adjustment. The pattern was different for stress: mothers directly benefited from the support they received from their family in reducing their stress levels, while fathers benefited both directly from the support they received from friends and indirectly from the support that their partners received from family. These results highlight that (1) the different support needs of mothers and fathers (due to their different roles during transition to parenthood) and (2) the diffusion of benefits of social support within the couple should be taken into account when developing strategies to promote support to families of six-month-old infants with a CA.

Keywords

Actor–partner effects burden parenting stress parents of infants with a congenital anomaly social support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albuquerque

Fonseca

Pereira

(2011) Estudos psicométricos da versão Portuguesa da escala de impacto familiar (EIF) [Psycomethric studies of the Portuguese version of the Impact on Family Scale]. Laboratório de Psicologia 9(2): 175–189.

Barr

(2012) A dyadic analysis of negative emotion personality predisposition effects with psychological distress in neonatal intensive care unit parents. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy 4(4): 347–355.

Biehle

Mickelson

(2011) Personal and co-parent predictors of parenting efficacy across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 30(9): 985–1010.

Bost

Cox

Burchinal

(2002) Structural and supportive changes in couples’ family and friendship networks across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(2): 517–531.

Britner

Morog

Pianta

(2003) Stress and coping: A comparison of self-report measures of functioning in families of young children with cerebral palsy or no medical diagnosis. Journal of Child and Family Studies 12(3): 335–348.

Cook

Kenny

(2005) The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29(2): 101–109.

Crowley

(2010) An Introduction to Human Disease: Pathology and Pathophysiology Correlations, 8th edn. Sudbury, ON: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC.

Dorros

Card

Segrin

(2010) Interdependence in women with breast cancer and their partners: An interindividual model of distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78(1): 121–125.

European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) (2012) Prevalence tables. Available at: http://www.eurocat-network.eu/accessprevalencedata/prevalencetables (accessed 26 May 2012).

10.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

(2007) G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39: 175–191.

11.

Feldman

Sussman

Zigler

(2004) Parental leave and work adaptation at the transition to parenthood: Individual, marital and social correlates. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25(4): 459–479.

12.

Findler

(2000) The role of grandparents in the social support system of mothers of children with a physical disability. Families in Society 81(4): 370–381.

13.

Gameiro

Boivin

Canavarro

(2010) Social nesting: Changes in social network and support across the transition to parenthood in couples that conceived spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technologies. Journal of Family Psychology 24(2): 175–187.

14.

Gray

(2003) Gender and coping: The parents of children with high functioning autism. Social Science & Medicine 56(3): 631–642.

15.

Griffin

(2002) Supporting families of infants with congenital heart disease. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews 2(2): 83–89.

16.

Guralnick

Hammond

Neville

(2008) The relationship between sources and functions of social support and dimensions of child- and parent-related stress. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 52: 1138–1154.

17.

Hall

Graff

(2011) The relationships among adaptative behaviors of children with autism, family support, parenting stress, and coping. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 34: 4–25.

18.

Hornby

Ashworth

(1994) Grandparents’ support for families who have children with disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies 3(4): 403–412.

19.

House

(1981) Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

20.

Howard

(2006) Family-centered care in the context of fetal abnormality. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 20(3): 237–242.

21.

Hunfeld

Tempels

Passchier

(1999) Parental burden and grief one year after the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 24(6): 515–520.

22.

Jones

Passey

(2004) Family adaptation, coping and resources: Parents of children with developmental disabilities and behaviour problems. Journal on Developmental Disabilities 11(1): 31–46.

23.

Katz-Wise

Priess

Hyde

(2010) Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology 46(1): 18–28.

24.

Krauss

(1993) Child-related and parenting stress: Similarities and differences between mothers and fathers of children with disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation 97: 393–204.

25.

Lawoko

Soares

(2003) Social support among parents of children with congenital heart disease, parents of children with other diseases and parents of healthy children. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 10: 177–187.

26.

Levy-Shiff

(1999) Fathers’ cognitive appraisals, coping strategies, and support resources as correlates of adjusment to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology 13(4): 554–567.

27.

Locock

Alexander

(2006) Just a bystander? Men’s place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine 62: 1349–1359.

28.

Macias

Saylor

Haire

(2007) Predictors of paternal versus maternal stress in families of children with neural tube defects. Children’s Healthcare 36(2): 99–115.

29.

Mak

(2007) Caregiving perceptions of Chinese mothers of children with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 20: 145–156.

30.

Mazer

Gischler

Koot

(2008) Impact of Child with Congenital Anomalies on Parents (ICCAP) questionnaire: A psychometric analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6(102): 102–110.

31.

Messias

Gilliss

Sparacino

(1995). Stories of transition: Parents recall the diagnosis of congenital heart defect. Family Systems Medicine 13 (3/4): 367–377.

32.

Murray

Kelley-Soderholm

Murray

(2007) Strengths, challenges, and relational processes in families of children with congenital upper limb differences. Families, Systems and Health 25(3): 276–292.

33.

Olsson

Hwang

(2006) Well-being, involvement in paid work and division of child-care in parents of children with intellectual disabilities in Sweden. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50(12): 963–969.

34.

Preacher

Hayes

(2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 36(4): 717–731.

35.

Preacher

Hayes

(2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40(3): 879–891.

36.

Santos

(2011) Versão Portuguesa do Parenting Stress Index (PSI) - Forma reduzida: Estudo com uma amostra de mães de crianças com idade inferior a 5 anos [Portuguese version of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) short form: Study with a sample of mothers of children of five years or younger]. Poster presented at The VIII Congresso Iberoamericano de Avaliação Psicológica/XV Conferência Internacional de Avaliação Psicológica, July, Lisboa, Portugal.

37.

Sargent

(2009) Predictors of needs in mothers with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 27(2): 195–205.

38.

Tak

McCubbin

(2002) Family stress, perceived social support and coping following the diagnosis of a child’s congenital heart disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing 39(2): 190–198.

39.

Tunali

Power

(2002) Coping by redefinition: Cognitive appraisals in mothers of children with autism and children without autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 32(1): 25–34.

40.

Uzark

Jones

(2003) Parenting stress and children with heart disease. Journal of Pediatric Health Care 17: 163–168.