The aim of this study was to review and evaluate the psychometric properties of two general musculoskeletal outcome measures focusing on pediatric physical disability, namely, the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) and the Activities Scales for Kids (ASK). Although this review reveals the psychometric superiority of ASK to PODCI, further research should confirm the psychometric properties of both the instruments. A number of psychometric issues need to be further addressed. Specifically, future studies should examine additional types of reliability and validity, for example, content, construct, criterion, and discriminant with more sophisticated statistical analyses, for example, Aiken’s item content validity coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis. Until these issues are addressed, researchers should be cautious utilizing these instruments in children with musculoskeletal problems in a clinical setting.
AikenLR (1985) Three coefficients of analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Education Psychological Measurement35: 131–142.
2.
AllenDDGortonGEOeffingerDJ. (2008) Analysis of the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI) in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory methods. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics28(2): 192–198.
3.
AsherMAMin LaiSBurtonDC (2000) Further development and validation of the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcomes measures. Spine25: 2381–2386.
4.
BrutonAConwwayJHHolgateST (2000) Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured?Physiotherapy86: 94–99.
5.
BentlerPM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107: 238–246.
6.
DaltroyLHLiangMHFosselAHGoldbergMJ (1998) The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: Report on reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics18(5): 561–571.
7.
EllwoodPM (1988) Shattuck lecture–outcomes management: A technology of patient experience. New England Journal Medicine318: 1549–1556.
8.
FinchEBrooksDStratfordPWMayoNE (2002) Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making. Hamilton, ON: B. C. Decker.
9.
GrimshawJMShirranLThomasR. (2001) Changing provider behaviour: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care39(8 Suppl 2): II2–II45.
10.
HammondR (2000) Evaluation of physiotherapy by measuring the outcome. Physiotherapy86: 170–172.
11.
HaynesRSullivanE (2001) The Paediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Paediatric Orthopaedic Functional Health Questionnaire: An analysis of normal. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics21(5): 619–621.
12.
LermanJASullivanEBarnesDAHaynesRJ (2005) The pediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI) and functional assessment of patients with unilateral upper extremity deficiencies. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics25(3): 405–407.
13.
LermanJASullivanEHaynesRJ (2002) The pediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI) and functional assessment in patients with adolescent or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis or kyphosis. Spine27(18): 2052–2057.
14.
MayoNColeBDowlerJ. (1994) Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy: Survey of current practice. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation8: 81–82.
15.
MorrowJRJacksonAW (1993) How ‘significant’ is your reliability?Research Quarterly Exercise Sport64: 352–355.
16.
NathRKAvilaMBKaricherlaPSomasundaramC (2011) Assessment of triangle tilt surgery in children with obstetric brachial plexus injury using the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument. Open Orthopaedics Journal5: 385–388.
17.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIR (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
18.
ParkSMChungYCLeeMK (2012) Rasch analysis of the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument in 720 patients with cerebral palsy. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics32(4): 423–431.
19.
PencharzJYoungNLOwenJLWrightJG (2001) Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics21(4): 425–432.
20.
PountneyT (2007) Physiotherapy for Children. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier.
21.
TabachnickBGFidellIS (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
22.
WaiEKOwenJFehlingsDWrightJG (2000) Assessing physical disability in children with spina bifida and scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics20(6): 765–770.
23.
YoungLNWilliamJIYoshidaKKWrightJG (2000) Measurement properties of the Activities Scales for Kids. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology53: 125–137.
24.
YoungNLYoshidaKKWilliamsJI. (1995) The role of children in reporting their physical disability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilation76: 913–918.
25.
YoungNLVarniJWSniderL. (2009) The internet is valid and reliable for child-report: An example using the Activities Scales for Kids (ASK) and the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology62: 314–320.
