'Oh goodness,I am watching reality TV'

Abstract

One of the most striking challenges encountered during the empirical stages of our audience research project, `Making Class and the Self through Televised Ethical Scenarios' (funded as part of the ESRC's Identities and Social Action programme), stemmed from how the different discursive resources held by our research participants impacted upon the kind of data collected. We argue that social class is reconfigured in each research encounter, not only through the adoption of moral positions in relation to `reality' television as we might expect, but also through the forms of authority available for participants. Different methods enabled the display of dissimilar relationships to television: reflexive telling, immanent positioning and affective responses all gave distinct variations of moral authority. Therefore, understanding the form as well as the content of our participants' responses is crucial to interpreting our data. These methodological observations underpin our earlier theoretical critique of the `turn' to subjectivity in social theory (Wood and Skeggs, 2004), where we suggest that the performance of the self is an activity that reproduces the social distinctions that theorists claim are in demise.

Keywords

affect audience research methodology morality `reality' television reflexivity self social class

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adkins, L. (2002) `Reflexivity and the Politics of Qualitative Research' , in T. May (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 332—48. London: Sage.

Ahmed, S. (2004) `Affective Economies', Social Text 22(2): 117—39.

Ang, I. (1985) Watching Dallas. London: Routledge.

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Besnier, N. (1990) `Language and Affect', Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 418—51.

Bourdieu, P. (1986) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1987) `What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups', Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 1—17.

Buckingham, D. (1991) `What are Words Worth? Interpreting Children's Talk about Television', Cultural Studies 5(2): 228—45.

Dovey, J. (2000) Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television . London: Pluto Press.

10.

Foucault, M. (1971) L Ordre Du Discours. Paris: Gallimard.

11.

Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.

12.

Gray, A. (1992) Video Playtime: The Gendering of a Leisure Technology . London: Routledge.

13.

Hage, G. (1998) White Nation. Melbourne and London: Pluto Press.

14.

Katz, E. and J. Blumer (1974) The Uses of Mass Communication. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

15.

Kidd, P.S. and M.B. Parshall (2000) `Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytic Rigor in Focus Group Research', Qualitative Health Research 10(3): 293—308.

16.

Kim, S. (2004) `Re-reading David Morley's The Nationwide Audience' , Cultural Studies 18(1): 84—108.

17.

Kosofsky Sedgewick, E. (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity . Durham, NC: Duke University Press .

18.

Lawler, S. (2005) `Introduction: Class, Culture and Identity', Sociology 39(5): 797—816.

19.

Lury, C. (1998) Prosthetic Culture: Photography, Memory and Identity . London: Routledge.

20.

McRobbie, A. (2006) `Four Technologies of Young Womanhood', lecture presented at Zentrum fur Interdisziplinare Frauen und Geschlecterforschung, Berlin, 31 October 2006.

21.

Morley, D. (1980) The Nationwide Audience. London : BFI.

22.

Morley, D. (2006) `Unanswered Questions in Audience Research', The Communication Review 9: 101—21.

23.

Ong, A. (1999) Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

24.

Payne, G. and C. Grew (2005) `Unpacking “Class Ambivalence”: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Accessing Class Cultures', Sociology 39(5): 893—910.

25.

Press, A. (1990) `Class, Gender and the Female Viewer: Women's Responses to Dynasty', in M.E. Brown (ed.) Television and Women s Culture: The Politics of the Popular, pp. 158—82. London: Sage.

26.

Reynolds, T. (2002) `On Relations between Black Female Researchers and Participants', in T. May (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 300—10. London: Sage.

27.

Sayer, A. (2005) The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Seiter, E. (1990) `Making Distinctions in TV Audience Research: A Case Study of a Troubling Interview', Cultural Studies 4(1): 61—85.

29.

Seiter, E. (1999) Television and New Media Audiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30.

Silva, E.B. and D. Wright (2005) `The Judgement of Taste and Social Position in Focus Group Research', Sociologia e ricerca sociale 76—7: 241—53.

31.

Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable . London: Sage.

32.

Skeggs, B. (2002) `Techniques for Telling the Reflexive Self', in T. May (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 349—75. London: Sage.

33.

Skeggs, B. (2004a) Class, Self, Culture. London and New York: Routledge.

34.

Skeggs, B. (2004b) `Pierre Bourdieu's Analysis of Class, Gender and Sexuality', in L. Adkins and B. Skeggs (eds) Feminism After Bourdieu, pp. 19—35. Oxford: Blackwell.

35.

Thomas, L. (1995) `In Love with Inspector Morse: Feminist Subculture and Quality Television', Feminist Review 51: 1—25.

36.

Walkerdine, V. (2003) `Reclassifying Upward Mobility: Femininity and the Neo-Liberal Subject', Gender and Education 15(3): 237—48.

37.

Walkerdine, V. and L. Blackman (2001) Mass Hysteria. London: Edward Arnold.

38.

Wilkinson, S. (1998) `Focus Group Methodology: A Review', International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1: 181—203.

39.

Wood, H. (2005) `Texting the Subject: Women, Television, and Modern SelfReflexivity', The Communication Review 8(2): 115—35.

40.

Wood, H. (2007) `The Mediated Conversational Floor: An Interactive Approach to Reception Analysis', Media Culture and Society 29(1): 75—103.

41.

Wood, H. (in press) Talking With Television. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

42.

Wood, H. and B. Skeggs (2004) `Notes on Ethical Scenarios of Self on British “Reality” TV', Feminist Media Studies 4(2): 205—8.

43.

Wood, H. , B. Skeggs and N. Thumim (forthcoming) `It's Just Sad: The Mediation of Intimacy and Emotional Labour in “Reality” TV Viewing', in J. Hollows and S. Gillis (eds) Homefires: Affect, Judgement and Emotional Labour in Reality TV Viewing. London: Routledge.