Bodies without borders

Abstract

The movie Fantastic Voyage (1966) is not an innocent science fiction fantasy but a trope that concurrently underlies the development and implementation of a particular medical imaging technique: the endoscope. Sketching the past, present and future of endoscopy, this article advances the broader argument that medical imaging techniques and media technologies are developed concurrently. The endoscopic gaze - the look from within the body - has gradually become a pervasive mode of corporeal inspection, not only in high-tech medicine, but in television and other popular media as well. But what are the implications of this ubiquitous endoscopic gaze? How may innovations in endoscopic technologies - including the latest virtual techniques - affect doctors’ and patients’ concepts of corporeality? And do these innovations, in turn, affect our collective appreciation of surgical intervention and its consequences? Persistent myths of transparency and non-intervention have prevailed in both the production and popular dissemination of the endoscopic gaze, redefining our norms and expectations concerning the perfectibility of the body as a physical container.

Keywords

cultural studies of science medical imaging and popular culture medicine and culture television and medicine virtual reality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barad, K. (1998) ‘Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality’, Differences 10: 87-128.

Bolter, J. D. and R. Grusin (1998) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Connor, S. (1999) ‘Integuments: The Scar, the Sheen, the Screen’, New Formations 39: 32-54.

Crawford, T. H. (1998) ‘Visual Knowledge in Medicine and Popular Film’, Literature and Medicine 17: 24-44.

Cuschieri, A. and G. Berci (1990) Laparoscopic Biliary Surgery. Oxford: Blackwell.

Dale, K. (1997) ‘Identity in a Culture of Dissection: Body, Self and Knowledge’, in Kevin Hetherington and Rolland Munro (eds) Ideas of Difference, pp. 94-113. Social Spaces and the Labour of Division. London: Blackwell.

Garner, P. and M. Collins et al. (1999) ‘The Applications of Telepresence in Medicine’, in P. J. Sheppard and G. R. Walker (eds) Telepresence, pp. 323-334. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

Gerstenberger, P. D. and P. A. Plumeri (1993) ‘Malpractice Claims in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Analysis of Insurance Industry Database’, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 39: 132-138.

Hirschauer, S. (1991) ‘The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery’, Social Studies of Science 21: 279-319.

10.

Hirschowitz, B. I. (1993) ‘Development and Application of Endoscopy’, Gastroenterology 104: 337-342.

11.

Huhtamo, E. (1995) ‘Encapsulated Bodies in Motion’, in Simon Perry (ed.) Critical Issues in Electronic Media, pp. 159-186. New York: SUNY Press.

12.

Lauridsen, L. (1998) Laterna Magica in Corpore Humano. Arhus: The Steno Museum.

13.

Lenoir, T. (1999) ‘The Virtual Surgeon’, Cahiers de Science et Vie (October): 52-59.

14.

Lévy, P. (1998) Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age. New York: Plenum Trade.

15.

Marescaux, M. and D. Mutter et al. (1999) ‘The Virtual University Applied to Telesurgery: From Tele-Education to Tele-Manipulation’, Bulletin de L’Académie Nationale de Médecine 183: 509-522.

16.

Mitchell, W. J. T. (1992) The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photo-graphic Era. Cambridge: MIT Press.

17.

Mulvey, L. (1975) ‘Visual Pleasures and Narrative Cinema’, Screen 16: 6-18.

18.

Natali J. (1996) ‘Medicolegal Implications of Vascular Injuries during Video-endoscopic Surgery’, Journal des Maladies Vasculaires 21: 223-226.

19.

Robb, R. A. (1996) ‘Virtual (Computed) Endoscopy: Development and Evaluation Using the Visible Human Datasets’, paper presented at the Visible Human Project conference, 7-8 October 1996, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland.

20.

Robb, R. , A. S. Aharon and B. M. Cameron (1997) ‘Patient-specific Anatomic Models from 3-dimensional Medical Image Data for Clinical Applications in Surgery and Endoscopy’, Journal of Digital Imaging 10(3): 31-35.

21.

Satava, R. M. (1998) Cybersurgery: Advanced Technologies for Surgical Practice. New York: Wiley-Liss.

22.

Sawchuk, K. (2000) ‘Biotourism, Fantastic Voyage, and Sublime Inner Space’, in Kim Sawchuk and Janine Marchessault (eds) Wild Science: Feminist Images of Medicine and the Body, pp. 9-23. New York: Routledge.

23.

Sawday, J. (1995) The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge.

24.

Shohat, E. (1998) ‘Lasers for Ladies: Endo Discourse and the Inscription of Science’, in Paula Treichler , Lisa Cartwright and Constance Penley (eds) The Visible Woman: Imaging Technologies, Gender, and Science, pp. 240-272. New York: New York University Press.

25.

Thacker, E. (1999) ‘Performing the Technoscientific Body: Real Video Surgery and the Anatomy Theater’, Body & Society 5(2/3): 317-336.

26.

Yoshinaka, Y. (2000) ‘Exploring the Boundaries of Technological Practice in-the-making’, Paper presented at the Demarcation Socialised conference, August 2000, Cardiff.