This study investigates “Crazy Literature” (Fāfēng Wénxué 发疯文学) as a form of digital nonsense through which young people engage in affective sense-making about work-related precarity in China. Emerging from earlier E’gao spoof culture and subaltern tropes such as Diaosi and Sang Culture, Crazy Literature marks a shift from ironic self-deprecation of marginalized youth toward an active nihilism of an emerging precariat class often known as Dagongren (wage laborer) or Niuma (cow and horse) in the workplace. Drawing on affective rhetoric, this study tracks the circulation of work-related Crazy Literature across popular online platforms, showing how absurd language, schematic figures, and routinized performances materialize precarity and stabilize an ambient “craziness” that renders precarity an affective mode of self-making for youth in the workplace. Through circulation and commercial recuperation, “Crazy Literature” transforms venting into everyday affective resilience, turning “nonsense” into participatory and routinized forms of livability under precarity.
AhmedS (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Duke University Press.
2.
AnagnostA (2008) From “class” to “social strata”: Grasping the social totality in reform-era China. Third World Quarterly29(3): 497–519.
3.
BerlantL (2008) The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Duke University Press.
4.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press.
5.
ConradK (2009) The politics of camp: Queering parades, performance, and the public in Belfast. In: CreganD (ed.) Deviant Acts: Essays on Queer Performance. Carysfort Press, pp. 25–35.
6.
DobsonASKanaiA (2019) From “can-do” girls to insecure and angry: Affective dissonances in young women’s post-recessional media. Feminist Media Studies19(6): 771–786.
7.
GriesL (2015) Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. University Press of Colorado.
8.
GünterS (2017) The fear of failure: Youth employment problems in China. International Labour Review156(1): 73–98.
9.
HiziG (2021) Fluctuating affect: Purpose and deflation in paths of self-development. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory11(3): 942–957.
10.
IngrahamC (2020) Gestures of Concern. Duke University Press.
11.
KatzYShifmanL (2017) Making sense? The structure and meanings of digital memetic nonsense. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 825–842.
12.
LiuF (2011) Urban Youth in China: Modernity, the Internet and the Self. Routledge.
13.
López-LondoñoLM (2023) Expanding the framework of rhetorical circulation: An approach to online symbolic accretion through the rhizomorph. Quarterly Journal of Speech110(1): 27–50.
14.
MateusS (2019) Affective rhetoric: What is it and why it matters. In: ZhangLClarkC (eds) Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication. Routledge, pp. 69–80.
15.
MengB (2011) From steamed bun to grass mud horse: E gao as alternative political discourse on the Chinese internet. Global Media and Communication7(1): 33–51.
PangL (2022) China’s post-socialist governmentality and the garlic chives meme: Economic sovereignty and biopolitical subjects. Theory, Culture & Society39(1): 81–100.
18.
RickertTJ (2013) Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. University of Pittsburgh Press.
19.
SilvestriLE (2021) Precarity, nihilism, and grace. International Journal of Cultural Studies24(2): 360–377.
20.
SilvioTJ (2009) Tai/kuso/camp: “new opeila” and the structure of sensibility. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies10(3): 341–360.
21.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic.
22.
SumNL (2017) The makings of subaltern subjects: Embodiment, contradictory consciousness, and re-hegemonization of the diaosi in China. Globalizations14(2): 298–312.
23.
SunL (2025) Beyond resistance and resignation: A narrative inquiry into the “lying flat” movement and the reimagining of work, success, and autonomy among Chinese urban youth. Asian Journal of Social Science53(2): 100198.
24.
SunPZhaoGLiuZ, et al. (2022) Toward discourse involution within China’s internet: Class, voice, and social media. New Media & Society24(5): 1033–1052.
25.
SzablewiczM (2014) The “losers” of China’s internet: Memes as “structures of feeling” for disillusioned young netizens. China Information28(2): 259–275.
26.
TanKCChengS (2020) Sang subculture in post-reform China. Global Media and China5(1): 86–99.
27.
TangLYangP (2011) Symbolic power and the internet: The power of a “horse”. Media, Culture & Society33(5): 675–691.
28.
VeldstraC (2020) Bad feeling at work: Emotional labour, precarity, and the affective economy. Cultural Studies34(1): 1–24.
29.
WangZ (2023) 玩梗“发疯文学”：“00后” 大学生的网络表演分析 [playing with the meme of the “crazy literature”: Analysis of online performances by “post-2000” college students]. New Media Research9(13): 92–94.
30.
WetherellM (2012) Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Sage.
31.
WongJLeeCLongVK, et al. (2021) Let’s go, baby forklift!”: Fandom governance and the political power of cuteness in China. Social Media + Society7(2): 205630512110249.
32.
XuXTranLTXuX, et al. (2024) Between sang subculture and self-formation: An investigation into “haifei” in China. Studies in Higher Education50(7): 1408–1419.
33.
YanQGuoJ (2024) 青年群体的情绪危机与调适: 网络“发疯文学”的批判性话语分析 [emotional crisis and adjustment of youth group: A critical discourse analysis of online “crazy literature”]. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University53(3): 49–59.
34.
YangPTangLWangX (2015) Diaosi as infrapolitics: Scatological tropes, identity-making, and cultural intimacy on China’s internet. Media, Culture & Society37(2): 197–214.
35.
ZhangZLiK (2023) So you choose to “lie flat?” “Sang-ness,” affective economies, and the “lying flat” movement. Quarterly Journal of Speech109(1): 48–69.
36.
ZhangZLiK (2025) Youthful ambivalence towards a good life: Rhetorical anxieties as affective vacillations in hegang. Quarterly Journal of Speech111(2): 178–200.
37.
ZhangZMaoQ (2024) 网络流行语的形成、传播与营销价值——以“发疯文学”为例 [the formation, circulation, and marketing value of internet slang: A case study of “crazy literature”]. News Tribune38(6): 69–73.
38.
ZhengCQiX (2025) 我不发疯发什么”: 情动理论视角下的网络“发疯文学”研究 [“if I am not crazy, what should I post”: Research on online crazy literature from the perspective of affective theory]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication47(5): 24–46.
