We assessed collective efficacy (a group's judgment of their ability to perform a particular task) and some dimensions of shared mental models (models of the group structure, process and the task, that members hold in common) in student groups working on semester-long research projects. In particular, we assessed the extent to which group members had agreement and accuracy about members' past and future contributions to the group project, and agreement about the importance of various task aspects. Groups with higher efficacy early in the semester had more agreement and accuracy later in the semester. However, the reverse was not true; the extent to which agreement and accuracy developed early in the semester was not correlated with collective efficacy later in the semester. Also, groups with higher collective efficacy (as measured early and late in the semester) and more shared mental models (as measured late in the semester) received higher grades on their projects. A number of task process and social process variables were tested as possible mediators of these relationships; however, no significant mediators were found.
Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75-85.
2.
Baker, D. P. , & Salas, E. (1997). Principles for measuring teamwork: A summary and look toward the future. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Banker, R. D. , Field, J. M., Schroeder, R. G., & Sinha, K. K. (1996). Impact of work teams on manufacturing performance: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 867-890.
6.
Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
7.
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
8.
Bowers, C. A. , Braun, C. C., & Morgan, B. B. (1997). Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince, (Eds.) Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Brannick, M. T. , & Prince, C. (1997). An overview of team performance measurement. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.) Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Campion, M. A. , Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
11.
Campion, M. A. , Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.
12.
Cannon-Bowers, J. , Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N.J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Carley, K. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 533-558.
14.
Cohen, S. G. , & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
15.
Deal, J. J. , & Billings, R. S. (1996). Efficacy and outcome expectancies in a group context: On the usefulness and validity of the group-level construct. Unpublished manuscript. The Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Columbus, OH.
16.
Dickinson, T. L. , & McIntyre, R. M. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.) Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic workgroups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319-348.
18.
Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
19.
Fleishman, E. A. , & Zaccaro, S. J. (1997). Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
George-Falvey, J. , Daniels, D., Hopper, H., & Erez, M. (1996). Influencing group efficacy and group performance: The effects of interpersonal relationship and cognition enhancing interventions. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Cincinnati, OH.
21.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
22.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
23.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10-36.
24.
Gersick, C. J. G. , & Davis-Sacks, M. (1990). Summary: Task forces. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
26.
Gist, M. , & Mitchell, T. (1992). Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
27.
Gruenfeld, D. H. , & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Sociocognition in work groups: The evolution of group integrative complexity and its relation to task performance. Small Group Research, 24, 383-405.
28.
Guzzo, R. A. , Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
29.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In. J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Hinsz, V. B. (1995). Mental models of groups as social systems: Considerations of specification and assessment. Small Group Research, 26, 200-233.
32.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Transactive memory and learning in work relationships. Paper presented at the National Meetings of the Academy of Management, San Diego, August.
34.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Distributed expertise and communication processes in groups. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams. (Vol. 1, pp. 105-125). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
35.
Jung, D. I. , & Sosik, J. J. (1998). Group potency and collective efficacy: Predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance. Paper presented at the National Meetings of the Academy of Management, San Diego, August.
36.
Klimoski, R. , & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
37.
Kraiger, K. , & Wenzel, L. H. (1997). Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
Larson, J. R. , & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
39.
Lawler, E. , Mohrman, S., & Ledford, G. (1992). Employee involvement and total quality management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Levesque, L. L. , Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (1999). Shared mental models in software development teams. Paper presented at The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology conference, Atlanta.
41.
Levine, J. M. , Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
42.
Liang, D. W. , Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
43.
Lindsley, D. H. , Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., & Brass, D. J. (1994). Team efficacy, potency, and performance: A longitudinal examination of reciprocal processes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, April.
44.
Little, B. L. , & Madigan, R. M. (1994). Motivation in work teams: A test of the construct of collective efficacy. Paper presented at the National Meetings of the Academy of Management, August.
45.
McGrath, J. , Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D., Hollingshead, A. B., & O'Connor, K. (1993). Groups, tasks, and technology: The effects of experience and change. Small Group Research, 24, 406-420.
46.
Milanovich, D. M. , Muniiz, E. J., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1999). Team derailment: An initial examination. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, April.
47.
Mischel, L. J. , & Northcraft, G. (1997). 'I think we can, I think we can': The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team task effectiveness. In B. Markovsky, M.J. Lovaglio, & L. Troyer (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 14). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
48.
Mitchell, T. R. (1997). Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, (pp. 57-149). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
49.
Moreland, R. L. , Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Moreland, R. L. , Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in groups. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heathet al. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups: Social psychological applications to social issues. New York: Plenum.
51.
Morgeson, F. P. , & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.
52.
Osterman, P. (1994). How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 173-188.
53.
Parker, L. E. (1994). Perceived self- and collective- efficacy at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 43-59.
54.
Peterson, E. , & Thompson, L. (1997). Negotiation teamwork: The impact of information distribution and accountability on performance depends on the relationship among team members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 364-383.
55.
Prince, A. , Brannick, M. T., Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1997). The measurement of team process behaviors in the cockpit: Lessons learned. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
Prussia, G. E. , & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognition theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187-198.
57.
Rentsch, J. R. , & Hall, R. J. (1994). Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. In Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
58.
Riggs, M. L. , & Knight, P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 755-766.
59.
Rouse, W. , & Morris, N. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363.
60.
Rulke, D. L. , & Rau, P. (1997). Examining the encoding process of transactive memory in group training. Paper presented at National Meetings of the Academy of Management. Boston, August.
61.
Salas, E. , Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62.
Silver, W. S. , & Bufanio, K. M. (1996). The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group task performance. Small Group Research, 27, 347-359.
63.
Trends that will influence workplace learning in performance in the next five years . (1994, May). Training and Development, 29-32.
64.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
65.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
66.
Weick, K. E. , & Roberts, K. A. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
67.
Wellens, A. R. (1993). Group situation awareness and distributed decision making: From military to civilian applications. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 267-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68.
Wiesenfeld, B. M. , & Turner, J. K. (1995). Group esteem: Strategic implications of positive collective evaluations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Vancouver.
69.
Zaccaro, S. J. , Zazanis, M., Diana, M., & Greathouse, C. (1994). The antecedents of collective efficacy over a team's life span. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Nashville, April.
70.
Zander, A. W. (1977). Groups at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
