We examined various group identifications among Lebanese Muslims and Christians after the events of September 11 2001 and how these identifications related to social dominance orientation (SDO) and support for violence against the West. We expected stronger identification with less powerful groups to be associated with lower SDO (i.e. greater desires for group equality), and stronger support for terrorist organizations and violent acts against powerful nations. Consistent with these expectations, we found that SDO related negatively to identification with Arabs, and this group identification related positively to support for terrorist organizations and feelings that the September 11 attack was justified. Furthermore, we found that the direct negative effect of SDO on support for terrorism was mediated by Arab identification. Efforts to reduce conflict are discussed in terms of recognizing the anti-dominance elements of Arab identification in Lebanon, and the powerful implications that this subordinate group identification has for continued support of terrorist organizations and violence against the West.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, M. G., Levin, S., & Henry, P. J. (in press). Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology.
2.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182 .
3.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324 .
4.
Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict resolution(pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press .
5.
Eriksen, T. H. (2001). Ethnic identity, national identity, and intergroup conflict: The significance of personal experiences. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict resolution(pp. 42–68). New York: Oxford University Press .
6.
Faour, M. (1998). The silent revolution in Lebanon: Changing values of the youth. Beirut: American University of Beirut .
7.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press .
8.
Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (2002). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, religious identification, and support for terrorism in the Middle East. Working Paper # 186. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (2003). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Advances in social identity theory(pp. 48–70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
11.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge .
12.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory . Political Psychology, 22, 127–156 .
13.
Kelman, H. C. (2001). The role of national identity in conflict resolution: Experiences from Israeli–Palestinian problem-solving workshops. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict resolution(pp. 187–212). New York: Oxford University Press .
14.
Levin, S. (in press). Perceived group status differences and the effects of gender, ethnicity, and religion on social dominance orientation. Political Psychology.
15.
Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20, 99–126 .
16.
Levin, S., Sinclair, S., Sidanius, J., & van Laar, C. (2003). In search of a viable common ingroup identity: A social dominance perspective. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17.
Poll says Muslims angry at US. (2002, February 27). BBC News.
18.
Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 31, pp. 191–263). San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
19.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763 .
20.
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. (in press). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology.
Sidanius, J., Henry, P. J., Pratto, F., & Levin, S. (in press). Arab attributions for the attack on America: The case of Lebanese sub-elites. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
25.
Sidanius, J., & Petrocik, J. R. (2001). Communal and national identity in a multiethnic state: A comparison of three perspectives. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction(pp. 101–129). New York: Oxford University Press .
26.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press .
27.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (in press). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu. British Journal of Social Psychology.
28.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, ingroup attachment and social dominance orientation . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194–216 .
29.
Struch, N., & Schwartz, S.H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctiveness from ingroup bias . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373 .
30.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
31.
United Nations Development Program (1998). The national human development report, Lebanon 1998: Youth and development. New York: United Nations Publications .
32.
United Nations Development Program. (2003). The Arab human development report 2002: Creating opportunities for future generations. New York: United Nations Publications .
33.
Weisberg, H. F., Krosnick, J. A., & Bowen, B. D. (1996). An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
