White Americans' Genetic Lay Theories of Race Differences and Sexual Orientation: Their Relationship with Prejudice toward Blacks,and Gay Men and Lesbians
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2006
White Americans' Genetic Lay Theories of Race Differences and Sexual Orientation: Their Relationship with Prejudice toward Blacks,and Gay Men and Lesbians
This study examined the relationship between White Americans' genetic explanations, conceptualized as genetic lay theories, for perceived racial differences and for sexual orientation, and attitudes toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians, respectively. Considering contrasting public discourse surrounding race and sexual orientation, we predicted that genetic lay theories would be associated with greater prejudice toward Blacks, but less prejudice toward gay men and lesbians. The findings, based on a representative sample of 600 White Americans, were consistent with expectations. Results are discussed in relation to the literature on essentialism and implicit theories of the malleability of traits. The present research broadens our view of lay theories by showing how they support either prejudice or tolerance, depending on the target group.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
2.
Anderson, N. B. , & Nickerson, K. J. (2005). Genes, race, and psychology in the genome era [Special issue] . American Psychologist, 60.
3.
Andrews, L. B. (1999). Predicting and punishing antisocial acts: How the criminal justice system might use behavioral genetics. In R. A. Carson & M. A. Rothstein (Eds.), Behavioral genetics: The clash of culture and biology(pp. 116–155). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
4.
Black, E. (2003). War against the weak: Eugenics and America's campaign to create a master race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows .
5.
Bobo, L. , & Kluegel, J. R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes?American Sociological Review, 58, 443–464 .
6.
Bobo, L. , & Smith, R. A. (1998). From Jim Crow racism to laissez-faire racism: The transformation of racial attitudes in America. In W. Katkin , N. Landsman , & A. Tyree (Eds.), Beyond pluralism: Essays on the conception of groups and group identities in America(pp. 182–220). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press .
7.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
8.
Born gay . (1993, July 26). Time, p. 36-36.
9.
Brescoll, V. , & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences . Psychological Science, 15, 515–520 .
10.
Chiu, C. , Dweck, C. S. , Tong, J. Y. , & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923–940 .
11.
Chiu, C. , & Hong, Y. (1999). Social identification in a political transition: The role of implicit beliefs . International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 297–318 .
12.
Collins, F. S. , Green, E. D. , Guttmacher, A. E. , & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research . Nature, 422, 835–847 .
13.
Conrad, P. (1997). Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems . Social Problems, 44, 139–154 .
14.
Conrad, P. , & Markens, S. (2001). Constructing the ‘gay gene’ in the news: Optimism and skepticism in the US and British press . Health, 5, 373–400 .
15.
Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger .
16.
Dweck, C. S. , Chiu, C. , & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives . Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285 .
17.
Dweck, C. S. , Chiu, C. , & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model . Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333 .
18.
Ellis, L. (1998). The evolution of attitudes about social stratification: Why many people (including social scientists) are morally outraged by The Bell Curve . Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 207–216 .
19.
Entine, J. (2000). Taboo: Why black athletes dominate sports and why we are afraid to talk about it. New York: Public Affairs .
20.
Ernulf, K. E. , Innala S. M. , & Whitam, F. L. (1989). Biological explanation, psychological explanation, and tolerance of homosexuals: A cross-national analysis of beliefs and attitudes . Psychological Reports, 65, 1003–1010 .
21.
Focus on the Family (2004). Homosexuality. Retrieved October 30, 2004, from http://www.family.org
22.
Galton, F. (1892/1972). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith .
23.
Gelman, D. (1992, February 24). Born or bred?Newsweek, p. 46-46.
24.
Gelman, S. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press .
25.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton .
26.
Graham, S. (1995). Implicit theories as conceptualized by an attribution researcher . Psychological Inquiry, 6, 294–297 .
27.
Haddock, G. , Zanna, M. P. , & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118 .
28.
Hamer, D. H. , Hu, S. , Magnuson, V. L. , Hu, N. , & Pattatucci, A. M. L. (1993). A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation . Science, 261, 321–327 .
29.
Haslam, N. , & Levy, S. R. (in press). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
30.
Haslam, N. , Rothschild, L. , & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories . British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127 .
31.
Haslam, N. , Rothschild, L. , & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87–100 .
32.
Haslam, N. , Rothschild, L. , & Ernst, D. (2004). Essentialism and entitativity: Structure of beliefs about the ontology of social categories. In V. Yzerbyt , C. M., Judd , & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception(pp. 61–78). New York: Psychology Press .
33.
Hegarty, P. (2002). ‘It's not a choice, it's the way we're built’: Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain . Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 153–166 .
34.
Hegarty, P. , & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723–735 .
35.
Hong, Y. , Levy, S. R. , & Chiu, C. (Eds.). (2001). Lay theories and their role in the perception of social groups [Special issue] . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2).
36.
Hubbard, R. , & Wald, E. (1997). Exploding the gene myth: How genetic information is produced and manipulated by scientists, physicians, employers, insurance companies, educators, and law enforcers. Boston: Beacon Press .
37.
Human Rights Campaign (2003, October 20). HRC welcomes scientific study exploring genetic basis of sexual orientation and gender identity (press release). http://www.hrc.org/Content/ContentGroups/News_Releases
38.
Jayaratne, T. E. (2002). White and Black Americans' genetic explanations for perceived gender, class, and race differences: The psychology of genetic beliefs. Invited lecture at the 2002 Human Genome Lecture Series, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD .
39.
Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702 .
40.
Kinder, D. R. , & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
41.
Kitcher, P. (1997). The lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities. New York: Touchstone .
42.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology . Psychological Inquiry, 1, 181–197 .
43.
Lerner, R. M. (1992). Final solutions: Biology, prejudice, and genocide. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University .
44.
Levy, S. R. , Plaks, J. E. , Hong, Y. , Chiu, C. , & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 156–168 .
45.
Levy, S. R. , Stroessner, S. J. , & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436 .
46.
Martin, C. L. , & Parker, S. (1995) Folk theories about sex and race differences . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 45–57 .
47.
McConahay, J. B. , & Hough, J. C. (1976). Modern racism . Journal of Social Issues, 32, 23–45 .
48.
Nelkin, D. , & Lindee, M. S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman .
49.
Niccol, A. (Director). (1997). Gattaca[Motion picture]. United States: Columbia Pictures .
50.
Pettigrew, T. F. , & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe . European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75 .
51.
Plaks, J. E. , Levy, S. R. , Dweck, C. S. , & Stroessner, S. J. (2004). In the eye of the beholder: Lay theories and the perception of group entitativity, variability, and essence. In V. Yzerbyt , C. M. Judd , & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception(pp. 127–146). New York: Psychology Press .
52.
Rice, G. , Anderson, C. , Risch, N. , & Ebers, G. (1999). Male homosexuality: Absence of linkage to microsatellite markers at Sq28 . Science, 284, 571-571 .
53.
Ridley, M. (1999). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. New York: Harper Collins .
54.
Rothbart, M. , & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. S. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition(pp. 11–36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
55.
Rushton, J. P. , & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235–294 .
56.
Sakalli, N. (2002). Application of the attribution-value model of prejudice to homosexuality . Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 264–271 .
57.
Scott, J. (1993, December 8). The latest parenting debate. The Los Angeles Times, pp. E1-E1, E6-E6.
58.
Sheldon, J. P. , Pfeffer, C. A. , Jayaratne, T. E. , Feldbaum, M. , & Petty, E. M. (in press). Beliefs about the etiology of homosexuality and about the ramifications of discovering its possible genetic origin . Journal of Homosexuality.
59.
Sidanius, J. , & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press .
60.
Smedley, A. , & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real . American Psychologist, 60, 16–26 .
61.
Stein, E. (1999). The mismeasure of desire: The science, theory and ethics of sexual orientation. New York: Oxford University Press .
62.
Tygart, C. E. (2000). Genetic causation attribution and public support of gay rights . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 259–275 .
63.
Verkuyten, M. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects . British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 371–391 .
64.
Watson, T. , & Shapiro, J. P. (1995, November 13). Is there a ‘gay gene’?U.S. News and World Report, pp. 93–96.
65.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford .
66.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University .
67.
Yang, A. S. (1997). The polls–trends: Attitudes toward homosexuality . Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 477–507 .
68.
Yzerbyt, V. , Estrada, C. , Corneille, O. , Seron, E. , & Demoulin, S. (2004). Subjective essentialism in action: Self-anchoring and social control as consequences of fundamental social divides. In V. Yzerbyt , C. M. Judd , & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception(pp. 101–124). New York: Psychology Press .
69.
Yzerbyt, V. , Judd, C. M. , & Corneille, O. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview. In V. Yzerbyt , C. M. Judd , & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception(pp. 1–22). New York: Psychology Press .
70.
Yzerbyt, V. , & Rogier, A. (2001). Blame it on the group: Entitativity, subjective essentialism, and social attribution. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations(pp. 103–134). New York: Cambridge University Press .
