Past research on racial perception has often focused on responses from White participants, making it difficult to determine the role of perceiver race in the perception of others. Similarly, studies examining perceptions of individuals whose racial category membership is unclear have not systematically examined responses from non-Whites. This was addressed by showing Asian participants pictures of Whites, Asians, and racially ambiguous White-Asian faces. Event-related potentials were recorded to measure early attention responses. Participants initially oriented more to outgroup White than ingroup Asian or racially ambiguous faces. Shortly after that, they showed sensitivity to the racial context in which the faces were presented, more deeply processing ingroup Asian and racially ambiguous faces when they were seeing lots of other Asians, but more deeply processing outgroup White and racially ambiguous faces when they were seeing lots of other Whites. Still later, responses were more sensitive to the objective physical properties of the faces, with racially ambiguous faces differentiated from both Whites and Asians. These results demonstrate the fluidity of racial processing, and when compared to responses obtained from White participants, show how perceiver race and racial context influences attention to racial cues.
Anthony, T., Copper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296-301.
2.
Bar-Haim, Y., Ziv, T., Lamy, D., & Hodes, R.M. (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing . Psychological Science, 17, 159-163.
3.
Bentin, S., & Deouell, L.Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35-54.
4.
Bodenhausen, G.V., & Macrae, C.N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. Advances in Social Cognition, 11, 1-52.
5.
Brewer, M.B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. Advances in Social Cognition, 1, 1-36.
6.
Buckhout, R., & Regan, S. (1988). Explorations in research on the other-race effect in face recognition. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues: Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 40-46). Oxford , UK: Wiley.
7.
Cacioppo, J.T., Crites, S.L., Jr., Berntson, G.G., & Coles, M.G.H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science, 4, 108-112.
8.
Chance, J.E., & Goldstein, A.G. (1981). Depth of processing in response to own- and other-race faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 475-480.
9.
Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879-894.
10.
Corneille, O., Huart, J., Becquart, E., & Brédart, S. (2004) When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: Accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 236-250.
11.
Dickter, C.L., & Bartholow, B.D. (2007). Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 189-198.
12.
Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!…Surprise? Psychophysiology , 18, 493-513.
13.
Eberhardt, J., Dasgupta, N., & Banaszynski, T.L. (2003). Believing is seeing: The effects of racial labels and implicit beliefs on face perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 360-370.
Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. NeuroReport, 13, 427-431.
16.
Eimer, M., & Holmes, A., & McGlone, F. (2003). The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: An ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions . Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 97-110.
17.
Fazio, R.H., Jackson, J.R., Dunton, B.C., & Williams, C.J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
18.
Feinman, S., & Entwisle, D.R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506-510.
19.
Fiske, S.T., & Neuberg, S.L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category - based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-73.
20.
Golby, A.J., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Chiao, J.Y., & Eberhardt, J.L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 845-850.
21.
Goldstein, A.G., & Chance, J.E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47-59.
22.
Hillyard, S.A., & Munte, T.F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 185-198.
23.
Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.
24.
Ito, T.A., Thompson, E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2004). Tracking the timecourse of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1267-1280.
25.
Ito, T.A., & Urland, G.R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616-626.
26.
Ito, T.A., & Urland, G.R. (2005). The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 21-36.
27.
Ito, T.A., Willadsen-Jensen, E.C., & Park, P. (2007). From perception to evaluation: Early attention and automatic activation of bias to racially ambiguous faces. Manuscript under review.
28.
Jennings, J.R. (1987). Editorial policy on analyses of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology, 24, 474-478.
29.
Karylowski, J.J., Motes, M.A., Curry, D., & Van Liempd, D. (2002). `In what font color is Bill Cosby's name written?': Automatic racial categorization in a Stroop task . North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 1-12.
30.
Kubota, J.T., & Ito, T.A. (2007). Multiple cues in social perception: The time course of processing race and facial expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 738-752.
31.
Levin, D.T. (1996). Classification of faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.
32.
Levin, D.T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559-574.
33.
Luck. S. J., & Hillyard, S.A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology , 31, 291-308.
34.
MacLin, O.H., & Malpass, R.S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, 98-118.
35.
Malpass, R.S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 330-334.
36.
Medin, D.L., & Schaffer, M.M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
37.
Ng, W.-J., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 25, 217-232.
38.
Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology , 88, 760-763.
39.
Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology , 19, 473-497.
40.
Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H.G. (1983). Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination trials. Psychophysiology, 20, 168-179.
41.
Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004). Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and nonnative effects . Developmental Science, 7, 74-87.
42.
Sangrigoli, S., Pallier, C., Argenti, A.M., Ventureyra, V.A.G., & de Schonen, S. (2005). Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science, 16, 440-444.
43.
Sekaquaptewa, D., Waldman, A., & Thompson, M. (2007). Solo status and self-construal: Being distinctive influences racial self-construal and performance apprehension in AfricanAmerican women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 321-327.
44.
Semlitsch, H.V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the LPP ERP. Psychophysiology , 23, 695-703.
45.
Shapiro, P.N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies . Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
46.
Smith, E.R., & Zarate, M.A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.
47.
Stangor, C., Lynch, L.Duan, C., & Glass, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207-218.
48.
Tanaka, J.W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A.L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488-1497.
49.
Valentine, T. (1991) A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
50.
Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 61, 259-273.
51.
Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
52.
Wijers, A.A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., Mulder, L.J.M., & Scheffers, M.K. (1989). Attention to color: An analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 26, 89-109.
53.
Willadsen-Jensen, E.C., & Ito, T.A. (2006). Ambiguity and the timecourse of racial categorization . Social Cognition, 24, 580-606.
