Social stereotypes involve judgments of how typical certain personality traits are of a group. According to the attribution hypothesis, judgments of trait typicality depend on the perceived prevalence of the trait in the target group. According to the categorization hypothesis, such judgments depend on the degree to which a trait is thought to be more or less prevalent in the target group than in a relevant comparison group. A study conducted with women and men as target groups showed that the attribution hypothesis fit the data best when typicality ratings were made in an absolute format. When, however, typicality ratings were made in a comparative format (how typical is the trait of women as compared with men?), both hypotheses received support. Analytical derivation, supported by empirical evidence, showed an inverse relationship between the size of perceived group differences and their weight given in stereotyping. Implications for stereotype measurement and the rationality of social perception are discussed.
Allen, B.P. (1995). Gender stereotypes are not accurate: A replication of Martin (1987) using diagnostic vs. self-report and behavioral criteria . Sex Roles, 32, 583-600.
2.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
3.
Anderson, J.R., & Schooler, L.J. (1991). Reflections on the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396-408.
4.
Bem, S.L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
5.
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
6.
Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P.M., & Christie, C. (2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 192-212.
Chambers, J.R., & Windschitl, P.D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813-838.
9.
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., Lam, I.C., Fu, J.H., Tong, J.Y., & Lee, V.S. (1998). Stereotyping and self-presentation: Effects of gender stereotype activation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 81-96.
10.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Diekman, A.B., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
13.
Diekman, A.B., Eagly, A.H., & Kulesa, P. (2002). Accuracy and bias in stereotypes about the social and political attitudes of women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 268-282.
14.
Eagly, A.H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
15.
Eiser, J.R. (1996). Accentuation revisited. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities. Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 121-142). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann .
16.
Eiser, J.R. (2003). The accentuation principle in social judgment: A connectionist reappraisal . In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 486-511). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Estes, W.K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37-64.
18.
Ford, T.E., & Stangor, C. (1992). The role of diagnosticity in stereotype formation: Perceiving group means and variances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 356-367.
19.
Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G.V., & Banse, R. (2005). We are, therefore they aren't: Ingroup construal as a standard of comparison for outgroup judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 515-526.
20.
Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Bounded and rational. In R. J. Stainton (Ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science (pp. 115-133). Oxford: Blackwell .
21.
Goldstone, R.L. (1996). Isolated and interrelated concepts. Memory and Cognition, 24, 608-628.
22.
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
23.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: 3 speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
24.
Hall, J.A., & Carter, J.D. (1999). Gender-stereotype accuracy as an individual difference . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 350-359.
25.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information . American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
26.
Hilton, J.L., & von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237-271.
27.
Hyde, J.S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
28.
Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 27, 443-463.
29.
Judd, C.M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109-128.
30.
Judd, C.M., Park, B., Yzerbyt, V., Gordijn, E.H., & Muller, D. (2005). Attributions of intergroup bias and outgroup homogeneity to ingroup and outroup others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 677-704.
31.
Kanahara, S. (2006). A review of the definitions of stereotype and a proposal for a progressional model. Individual Differences Research, 4, 306-321.
32.
Kenny, D.A., & Winquist, L. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In F. J. Bernieri & J. A. Hall (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Krueger, J.I. (1992). On the overestimation of between-group differences . In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 31-56). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
34.
Krueger, J.I. (1996). Probabilistic national stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 961-980.
35.
Krueger, J.I. (2008). The robust beauty of simple associations. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn M. Dawes (pp. 111-140). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
36.
Krueger, J.I., & Clement, R.W. (1994). Memory-based judgments about multiple categories: A revision and extension of Tajfel's accentuation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 35-47.
37.
Krueger, J.I., & DiDonato, T.E. (2008). Social categorization and the perception of groups and group differences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass: Group Processes, 2, 733-750.
38.
Krueger, J.I., Hasman, J.F., Acevedo, M., & Villano, P. (2003). Perceptions of trait typicality in gender stereotypes: Examining the role of attribution and categorization processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 108-116.
39.
Kunda, A., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
40.
Lambert, A.J., Payne, B.K., Jacoby, L.L., Shaffer, L.M., Chasteen, A.L., & Khan, S.R. (2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the `social facilitation' of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 277-295.
41.
Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist, 47, 796-801.
42.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
43.
McCauley, C., & Stitt, C.L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929-940.
44.
McNemar, Q. (1969). Psychological statistics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
45.
Macrae, C.N., Milne, A.B., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37-47.
46.
Mann, J.W. (1967). Inconsistent thinking about group and individual . Journal of Social Psychology, 71, 235-245.
47.
Martell, R.F., & DeSmet, A. (2001). A diagnostic-ratio approach to measuring beliefs about the leadership abilities of male and female managers . Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1223-1231.
48.
Martin, C.L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489-499.
49.
Moore, D., & Small, D. (2008). When it is rational for the majority to believe that they are better than average. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn M. Dawes (pp. 141-174). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
50.
Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., & Turner, J.C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323-360.
52.
Robbins, J.M., & Krueger, J.I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47.
53.
Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., & Broverman, I. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 32, 287-295.
54.
Rothbart, M., Davis-Stitt, C., & Hill, J. (1997). Effects of arbitrarily placed category boundaries on similarity judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 33, 122-145.
55.
Schneider, D.J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York, NY: Guilford.
56.
Schwarz, N. (1998). Communication in standardized research situations: A Gricean perspective. In S. Fussell & R. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and Cognitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication (pp. 39-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57.
Spence, J.T., & Buckner, C.E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
58.
Stamos-Rossnagel, C. (2001). Revealing hidden covariation detection: Evidence for implicit abstraction at study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1276-1288.
59.
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
60.
Swim, J.K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.
61.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 149-178.
62.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
63.
Wittenbrink, B., Gist, P.L., & Hilton, J.L. (1997). Structural properties of stereotypic knowledge and their influences on the construal of social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 526-543.
64.
Wyer, N.A., Sadler, M.S., & Judd, C.M. (2002). Contrast effects in stereotype formation and change: The role of comparative context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 443-458.
65.
Zawadski, B. (1948). Limitations of the scapegoat theory of prejudice . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 127-141.
