We conducted two studies to examine how information about outgroup leaders' negative actions affect ingroup leader favorability ratings. Study 1 found that people hold more favorable attitudes toward ingroup leaders (i.e. their own nation's leaders) when learning of negative actions of outgroup leaders (i.e. another nation's leaders). Study 2 replicated the finding, examining social identity strength as a moderator of this effect, and found that participants with strong national identification exhibit this intergroup leader-enhancement effect but participants with weak national identification do not. These data extend previous research on liking for leaders and are consistent with predictions derived from social identity theory. The implications of these findings for intergroup relations research and the psychological study of leadership are discussed.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2.
Ahlering, R. (2003). Collective self-esteem data from four ethnic groups . Psychological Reports, 92, 562-564.
3.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
4.
Ashmore, R.D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality . Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114.
5.
Branscombe, N.R., Schmitt, M.T., & Harvey, R.D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
6.
Brewer, M.B., & Brown, R.J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Linzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 99-142). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Carvallo, M., & Pelham, B.W. (2006). When fiends become friends: The need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 94-108.
8.
Cassidy, C., O'Connor, R.C., Howe, C., & Warden, D. (2004). Perceived discrimination and psychological distress: The role of personal and ethnic self-esteem. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 329-339.
9.
Chen, S., Chen, K.Y., & Shaw, L. (2004). Self-verification motives at the collective level of self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 86, 77-94.
10.
Cohen, F., Solomon, S., Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2004). Fatal Attraction: The effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-orientated, and relationship-orientated leaders. Psychological Science, 15, 846-851.
11.
Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-77.
12.
De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2001). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
13.
Duck, J.M., & Fielding, K.S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 387-401.
14.
Eccleston, C.P., & Major, B.N. (2006). Attribution to discrimination and self-esteem: The role of group identification and appraisals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(2), 147-162.
Hains, S.C., Hogg, M.A., & Duck, J.M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1099.
17.
Hakmiller, K.L. (1966). Need for self-evaluation, perceived similarity and comparison choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Supplement, 1, 49-54.
18.
Haslam, S.A., McGarty, C., Brown, P.M., Eggins, R.A., Morrison, B.E., & Reynolds, K.J. (1998). Inspecting the emperor's clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 168-184.
19.
Haslam, S.A., Oakes, P.J., McGarty, C., Turner, J.C., & Onorato, R.S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 509-530.
20.
Haslam, S.A., & Platow, M.J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
21.
Hogg, M.A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
22.
Hogg, M.A., Hains, S.C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75, 1248-1263.
23.
Hogg, M.A. & Van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
Hoyt, C., Simon, S., & Reid, L. (in press). The effect of mortality salience on leader preference based on gender. The Leadership Quarterly.
25.
Landau, M.J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., & Arndt, J. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George G. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136-1150.
26.
Lord, R.G., & Hall, R.J. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skills. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 591-615.
27.
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
28.
Newport, F. (2003, October 28). Bush's favorable rating running higher than job approval. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing.
29.
Nye, J.L., & Forsyth, D.R. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals. Small Group Research, 22(3), 360-379.
30.
Oakes, P., Haslam, S.A., & Turner, J.C. (1998). The role of prototypicality in group influence and cohesion: Contextual variation in the graded structure of social categories . In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Páez, & J. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 75-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
Pittinsky, T.L. (2007). The science and practice of intergroup leadership . In T. L. Pittinsky (Ed.), Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference. Manuscript in preparation.
32.
Pittinsky, T.L., Rosenthal, S.A., Bacon, L.M., Montoya, R.M., & Zhu, W. (2006). National Leadership Index 2006: A national study of confidence in leadership. Cambridge, MA: Center for Public Leadership, Harvard Kennedy School.
33.
Pittinsky, T.L., & Simon, S. (2007). Intergroup leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 586-605.
34.
Pittinsky, T.L., & Zhu, C. (2005). Contemporary public leadership in China: A research review and consideration. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 921-939.
35.
Platow, M.J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494.
36.
Platow, M.J., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508-1519.
37.
Sellers, R.M., Rowley, S., Chavous, T.M., Shelton, J.N., & Smith, M.A. (1997). The multidimensional inventory of Black identity: Construct validity and reliability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 805-815.
38.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
39.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior . In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
40.
Taylor, D.M., Moghaddam, F.M., & Bellerose, J. (1989). Social comparison in an intergroup context. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 499-515.
41.
Turner, J.C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology , 5, 5-34.
42.
Turner, J.C., & Haslam, S.A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership . In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work. Advances in theory and research (pp. 25-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M.A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
44.
Van Knippenberg, B., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Leadership, identity and influence: Relational concerns in the use of influence tactics. In D. Van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations. London: SAGE.
45.
Vorauer, J.D., & Turpie, C.A. (2004). Disruptive effects of vigilance on dominant group members' treatment of outgroup members: Choking versus shining under pressure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 384-399.
46.
Wills, T.A. (1981). Downward social comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
47.
Winter, D.G., (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196-202.
