Four studies were conducted to test whether assimilation ideology affects majority group members’ attitudes towards ethnic minorities. Assimilation affirms and justifies the identity of majority groups and highly-identified group members are motivated to think and behave in the ingroup’s best interest. Therefore, it was expected that assimilation would make higher identifiers more negative. The first two studies focused on the individual endorsement of assimilation and the other two used an experimental design to encourage participants to think in terms of assimilation. Results in all four studies show that assimilation is related to more negative outgroup attitudes, especially for higher majority group identifiers. The findings are discussed in relation to attempts to rethink and rehabilitate assimilation theory, and to other ideologies for dealing with cultural diversity.
AlbaR.NeeV. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Arends-TóthJ.Van de VijverF. J. R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249–266.
3.
BerryJ. W. (2006). Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 719–734.
4.
BerryJ. W.KalinR. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 national survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 27, 301–320.
5.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657.
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
BrubakerR. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24, 531–548.
8.
BrugP.VerkuytenM. (2007). Dealing with cultural diversity: The endorsement of societal models among ethnic minority and majority youth in the Netherlands. Youth and Society, 39, 112–131.
9.
CorrellJ.ParkB.SmithJ. A. (2008). Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 471–491.
10.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446.
11.
DevosT.BanajiM. R. (2005). American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447–466.
12.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
13.
GansH. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of “assimilation” and “pluralism”: The interplay of acculturation and ethnic retention. In HirschmanC.KasinitzP.DeWindJ. (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 161–171). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
GlazerN. (1993). Is assimilation dead?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 122–136.
15.
GordonM. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
GuanY.VerkuytenM.FungH. H-I.BondM. H.ChenS. X.ChanC. C-H. (2010). Out-group value incongruence and intergroup attitude: The roles of common identity and multiculturalism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.04.00710.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.04.007.
17.
HagendoornL. (1995). Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 6, pp. 199–228). London: Wiley.
18.
HartmannD.GerteisJ. (2005). Dealing with diversity: Mapping multiculturalism in sociological terms. Sociological Theory, 23, 218–240.
19.
HongY-Y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC-Y.Benet-MartínezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.
20.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common in-group identity model of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242–256.
21.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
22.
JacksonJ. S.BrownK. T.BrownT. N.MarksB. (2001). Contemporary immigration policy orientations among dominant-group members in western Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 431–456.
23.
JoppkeC. (1999). How immigration is changing citizenship: A comparative view. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 629–652.
24.
JoppkeC. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. British Journal of Sociology, 55, 237–257.
25.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
26.
JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.). (2001) The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.HoganC. M.ChowR. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 857–869.
28.
KramerR. M.CarnevaleP. J. (2001). Trust and intergroup negotiation. In BrownR.GaertnerS. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 431–450). Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
LevyS. R.WestT. L.RamirezL. (2005). Lay theories and intergroup relations: A social-developmental perspective. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 16, pp. 189–220). London: Wiley.
30.
LevyS. R.WestT. L.RamirezL.KarafantisD. M. (2006). The Protestant work ethic: A lay theory with dual intergroup implications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 95–115.
31.
LoweryB. S.UnzuetaM. M.KnowlesE. D.GoffP. A. (2006). Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 961–974.
32.
MorrisonK. R.PlautV. C.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, doi: 10.1177/014616721038611810.1177/0146167210386118.
33.
MummendeyA.WenzelM. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.
34.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
35.
PlaksJ. E.StroessnerS. J.DweckC. S.ShermanJ. (2000). Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus counter stereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
36.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444–446.
37.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
38.
RichesonJ. A.NussbaumR. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417–423.
39.
RutherfordA. (2001). Introducing Anova and Ancova: A GLM approach. London: Sage.
40.
RyanC. S.CasasJ. F.ThompsonB. K. (2010). Interethnic ideology, intergroup perceptions, and cultural orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 29–44.
41.
RyanC. S.HuntJ. S.WeibleJ. A.PetersonC. R.CasasJ. F. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 617–637.
42.
ScrogginsD. (2005). The Dutch-Muslim cultural war. The Nation, June27th, 21–25.
43.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SnidermanP. M.HagendoornL. (2007) When ways of life collide: Multiculturalism and its discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
SnidermanP.PeriP.De FigueridoR.PiazzaT. (2000). The outsider: Prejudice and politics in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
47.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48.
TauschN.TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541–556.
49.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.PrinsK.BuunkB. P. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995–1013.
50.
VastaE. (2007). From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: Multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 713–740.
51.
Velasco GonzálezK.VerkuytenM.WeesieJ.PoppeE. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685.
52.
VerkuytenM. (2004). Everyday ways of thinking about multiculturalism. Ethnicities, 4, 53–74.
53.
VerkuytenM. (2005) Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multicultural hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138.
54.
VerkuytenM. (2006). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 17, pp. 148–184). London: Wiley.
55.
VerkuytenM. (2008). Multiculturalism and group evaluations among minority and majority groups. In LevyS. R.KillenM. (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
VerkuytenM. (2009). Self-esteem and multiculturalism: An examination among ethnic minority and majority groups in the Netherlands. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 419–427.
57.
VerkuytenM. (2010). Assimilation ideology and situational well-being among ethnic minority members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 269–275.
58.
VorauerJ. D.GagnonA.SasakiS. J. (2009). Salient intergroup ideology and intergroup interaction. Psychological Science, 20, 838–845.
59.
WardC.MasgoretA. (2006). An integrative model of attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 671–682.
60.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. (2006). Considering the tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19, 277–306.
61.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgements of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 635–654.
62.
ZárateM. A.GarciaB.GarzaA. A.HitlanR. (2004). Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as predictors of attitudes toward Mexican immigrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 99–105.
63.
ZárateM. A.ShawM. P. (2010). The role of cultural inertia in reactions to immigration on the U.S./Mexican border. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 45–57.
