This study draws from the literature in group processes and intergroup relations, metacognition, motivational processes, and criminology to identify risk factors for joining an extremist group, classifies individuals into risk profiles, and examines how the risk profiles moderate efforts at recruitment into such groups. The results of a latent profile analysis (N = 721) demonstrated the existence of three risk profiles (i.e., low, moderate, and high), and an experiment demonstrated that those in the low- and moderate-risk profile were significantly less likely to identify with a violent online political group compared to non-violent online political groups whereas those in the high-risk group were equally likely to identify with a violent or non-violent political online group. By taking a broader perspective, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of individual susceptibility to being drawn into a violent online extremist group and has important implications for those seeking to combat online radicalization.
AgnewR.BrezinaT.WrightJ. P.CullenF. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00949.x
5.
AltoA.Flores-RoblesG.AndersonK.WylieJ.SatterL.GantmanA. P. (2022). “I put Liberal but LOL”: Investigating psychological differences between political Leftists and Liberals. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/3qgep/download?format=pdf
6.
AmesD. R.KammrathL. K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jonb.0000039649.20015.0e
BeckA. T.BaruchE.BalterJ. M.SteerR. A.WarmanD. M. (2004). A new instrument for measuring insight: The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Schizophrenia Research, 68(2–3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00189-0
9.
BélangerJ. J. (2021). The sociocognitive processes of ideological obsession: Review and policy implications. Philosophical Transactions B, 376(1822), 20200144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0144
10.
BélangerJ. J.Adam-TroianJ.QuimpoN.AlKindiY.GajićM.NisaC. F. (2023). The dark tetrad personality traits moderate the relationship between ideological passion and violent activism. Psychology of Violence, 13(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000414
11.
BélangerJ. J.RobbinsB. G.MuhammadH.MoyanoM.NisaC. F.SchumpeB. M.Blaya-BurgoM. (2020). Supporting political violence: The role of ideological passion and social network. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(8), 1187–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220933954
CloudyJ.GotliebM. R.McLaughlinB. (2024). Online political networks as fertile ground for extremism: The roles of group cohesion and perceived group threat. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 21(4), 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2193580
DonnellanM. B.CongerR. D.BurzetteB. G. (2005). Criterion-related validity, self-other agreement, and longitudinal analyses for the Iowa personality questionnaire: A short alternative to the MPQ. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(4), 458–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.05.004
21.
DoosjeB.EllemersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(5), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1018
22.
DoosjeB.LosemanA.van den BosK. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12030
23.
DoosjeB.MoghaddamF. M.KruglanksiA. W.De WolfA.MannL.FeddesA. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008
FeddesA.NickolsonL.MannL.DoosjeB. (2020). Psychological perspectives on radicalization. Routledge.
27.
FergusonS. L.MooreE. W. G.HullD. M. (2020). Finding latent groups in observed data: A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419881721
28.
FinkelE. J.BailC. A.CikaraM.DittoP. H.IyengarS.KlarS.MasonL.McGrathM. C.NyhanB.RandD. G.SkitkaL. J.TuckerJ. A.Van BavelJ. J.WangC. S.DruckmanJ. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
29.
FrazerR. (2023). Marketing against extremism: Identifying and responding to moral disengagement cues in Islamic state terrorist propaganda. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 42(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221096394
30.
García-MieresH.UsallJ.FeixasG.OchoaS. (2020). Placing cognitive rigidity in interpersonal context in psychosis: Relationship with low cognitive reserve and high self-certainty. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 594840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.594840
31.
GaudetteT.ScrivensR.VenkateshV. (2022). The role of the internet in facilitating violent extremism: Insights from former right-wing extremists. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(7), 1339–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1784147
32.
GerstenfeldP. B.GrantD. R.ChiangC.-P. (2003). Hate online: A content analysis of extremist Internet sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 3(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x
33.
GiammarcoE. A.AtkinsonB.BaughmanH. M.VeselkaL.VernonP. A. (2013). The relation between antisocial personality and the perceived ability to deceive. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.004
34.
GonzálezK. V.VerkuytenM.WeesieJ.PoppeE. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in The Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X284443
35.
Gøtzsche-AstrupO. (2021). Pathways to violence: Do uncertainty and dark world perceptions increase intentions to engage in political violence?Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 13(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2020.1714693
HofmannD. C. (2020). How “alone” are lone-actors? Exploring the ideological, signaling, and support networks of lone-actor terrorists. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1493833
39.
HoggM. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69–126). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8
40.
HoggM. A.MeehanC.FarquharsonJ. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005
41.
HorganJ. G. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874738
42.
JensenM. A.Atwell SeateA.JamesP. A. (2020). Radicalization to violence: A pathway approach to studying extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1067-1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1442330
43.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2011). Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In HorowitzL. M.StrackS. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–269). Wiley & Sons.
44.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
45.
KenyonJ.BinderJ. F.Baker-BeallC. (2023). Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 28(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12218
KrispenzA.BertramsA. (2024). Understanding left-wing authoritarianism: Relations to the dark personality traits, altruism, and social justice commitment. Current Psychology, 43(3), 2714–2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04463-x
48.
KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM. J.BélangerJ. J.GunaratnaR.HettiarachchiM. (2014a). De-radicalising the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE): Some preliminary findings. In SilkeA. (Ed.), Prisons, terrorism and extremism (pp. 183–196). Routledge.
49.
KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM. J.BélangerJ. J.ShevelandA.HetiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2014b). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/43783789
KruglanskiA. W.OrehekE. (2011). The role of the quest for personal significance in motivating terrorism. In ForgasJ.KruglanskiA. W.WilliamsK. (Eds.), The psychology of social conflict and aggression (pp. 153–166). Psychology Press.
52.
KunstJ. R.ObaidiM. (2020). Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: The (re)emerging role of relative deprivation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.010
53.
LoweD. (2017). Prevent strategies: The problems associated in defining extremism: The case of the United Kingdom. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(11), 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1253941
54.
MacdougallA. I.van der VeenJ.FeddesA. R.NickolsonL.DoosjeB. (2018). Different strokes for different folks: The role of psychological needs and other risk factors in early radicalisation. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1–2), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170232
55.
MahfudY.Adam-TroianJ. (2021). “Macron demission!”: Loss of significance generates violent extremism for the Yellow Vests through feelings of anomia. Groups Processes & Intergroup Relations, 42(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219880954
56.
MannL.NickolsonL.FeddesA. R.DoosjeB.MoghaddamF. M. (2020). Exploring the viability of phase-based models in (de)radicalization. In HansenS. J.LidS. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of deradicalisation and disengagement (pp. 40–52). Routledge.
57.
MarshH. W.VallerandR. J.LafrenièreM.-A. K.ParkerP.MorinA. J. S.CarbonneauN.JowettS.BureauJ. S.FernetC.GuayF.Salah AbduljabbarA.PaquetY. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032573
58.
McCauleyC.MoskalenkoS. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550802073367
59.
McCauleyC.MoskalenkoS. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000062
60.
MeđedovićJ.PetrovićB. (2015). The Dark Tetrad: Structural properties and location in the personality space. Journal of Individual Differences, 36(4), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000179
NeoL. S.DillonL.KhaderM. (2017). Identifying individuals at risk of being radicalised via the internet. Security Journal, 30(4), 1112–1133. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-016-0080-z
63.
ObaidiM.KunstJ. R.KteilyN.ThomsenL.SidaniusJ. (2018). Living under threat: Mutual threat perception drives anti-Muslim and anti-Western hostility in the age of terrorism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(5), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2362
OttenS. (2017). Do group processes cause violence and aggression? In SturmeyP. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (pp. 1–11). Wiley.
66.
PaulhusD. L.BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.JonesD. N. (2021). Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
67.
PaulhusD. L.CurtisS. R.JonesD. N. (2018). Aggression as a trait: The dark tetrad alternative. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007
68.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
69.
PfattheicherS.SchindlerS. (2015). Understanding the dark side of costly punishment: The impact of individual differences in everyday sadism and existential threat. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2003
70.
PfundmairM.AßmannE.KiverB.PenzkoferM.ScheuermeyerA.SustL.SchmidtH. (2022). Pathways toward jihadism in Western Europe: An empirical exploration of a comprehensive model of terrorist radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1663828
71.
PlouffeR. A.SaklofskeD. H.SmithM. M. (2017). The Assessment of Sadistic Personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.043
PostmesT.SpearsR.LeaM. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006006
74.
RabinowitzJ. L. (1999). Go with the flow or fight the power? The interactive effects of social dominance orientation and perceived injustice on support for the status quo. Political Psychology, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00135
75.
RastD. E.IIIGaffneyA. M.HoggM. A.CrispR. J. (2012). Leadership under uncertainty: When leaders who are non-prototypical group members can gain support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.013
76.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
SchuurmanB.LindekildeL.MalthanerS.O’ConnorF.GillP.BouhanaN. (2019). End of the lone wolf: The typology that should not have been. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42(8), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1419554
ShumanE.Cohen-ChenS.Hirsch-HoeflerS.HalperinE. (2016). Explaining normative versus nonnormative action: The role of implicit theories. Political Psychology, 37(6), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12325
81.
ShumanE.GoldenbergA.SaguyT.HalperinE.van ZomerenM. (2024). When are social protests effective?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.10.003
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
85.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.RiosK. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–55). Psychology Press.
86.
StephensW.SieckelinckS.BoutellierH. (2021). Preventing violent extremism: A review of the literature. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(4), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1543144
87.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
88.
TellegenA. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In TumaA. H.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
89.
TripS.BoraC. H.MarianM.HalmajanA.DrugasM. I. (2019). Psychological mechanisms involved in radicalization and extremism. A rational emotive behavioral conceptualization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00437
90.
VallerandR. J.BlanchardC.MageauG. A.KoestnerR.RatelleC.LeonardM.GagneM. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756–767. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756
91.
van den BergH.van HemertD. A. (2023). Becoming a violent extremist: A General Need and Affect model of psychological variables. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 15(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1986110
92.
WahlströmM.TörnbergA. (2021). Social media mechanisms for right-wing political violence in the 21st century: Discursive opportunities, group dynamics, and co-ordination. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(4), 766–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1586676
93.
WebberD.BabushM.Schori-EyalN.Vazeou-NieuwenhuisA.HettiarachchiM.BélangerJ. J.MoyanoM.TrujilloH. M.GunaratnaR.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM. J. (2018). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111
WissingB. G.ReinhardM. (2017). The dark triad and the PID-5 maladaptive personality traits: Accuracy, confidence and response bias in judgments of veracity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1549, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01549
96.
WojcieszakM. (2010). ‘Don’t talk to me’: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342775
97.
WolfowiczM.LitmanovitzY.WeisburdD.HasisiB. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3), 1–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1174
ZmigrodL. (2020). The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: Theory, evidence, and future directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016
101.
ZmigrodL.EisenbergI. W.BissettP. G.RobbinsT. W.PoldrackR. A. (2021). The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: A data-driven approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376, 20200424. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0424
102.
ZmigrodL.GoldenbergA. (2021). Cognition and emotion in extreme political action: Individual differences and dynamic interactions. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 30(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421993820
