This article conceptualizes power in the context of long-term process of structural change. First, it discusses the field of transition studies, which deals with processes of structural change in societal systems on the basis of certain presumptions about power relations, but still lacks an explicit conceptualization of power. Then the article discusses some prevailing points of contestation in debates on power. It is argued that for the context of transition studies, it is necessary to develop an interdisciplinary framework in which power is explicitly conceptualized in relation to change. Subsequently, such a framework is presented, with reference to existing literature on power. Starting with a philosophical and operational definition of power, a typology is developed of the different ways in which power can be exercised, explicitly including innovative power and transformative power. Finally, the presented power framework is applied to transition studies, redefining pivotal transition concepts in terms of power and formulating hypotheses on the role of power in transitions. By doing so, the article not only offers an interdisciplinary framework to study power in the context of transition studies, but also contributes to power debates more generally by including innovation and transformation as acts of power, and thereby proposes a re-conceptualization of the relation between power and structural change.
Aladjam, T.K. ( 1995) ‘Of Truth and Disagreement: Habermas, Foucault and Democratic Discourse’, History of European Ideas20: 909-14.
2.
Arendt, H. ([1969] 2002) ‘On Violence’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader, pp. 137-45. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
3.
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. ( 1962) ‘The Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review53: 947-52.
4.
Barnes, B. ([ 1988] 2002) ‘The Nature of Power’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader , pp. 116-31. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
5.
Borch, C. ( 2005) ‘Systemic Power; Luhmann, Foucault and Analytics of Power’, Acta Sociologica48: 155-67.
6.
Bourdieu, P. ([1989] 2002) ‘Social Space and Social Power’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader, pp. 229-44. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
7.
Brocklesby, J. and Cummings, S. ( 1996) ‘Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking’, Journal of the Operational Research Society47: 741-54.
8.
Clegg, S.R. ([ 1989] 2002) ‘Frameworks of Power’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader , pp. 249-73. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
9.
Dahl, R.A. ( 1958) ‘A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model’, American Political Science Review56: 463-9.
10.
Dahl, R.A. ([ 1968] 2002) ‘Power’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
11.
Duineveld, M., Beunen, R., Ark, R.G.H. van; Assche, K.A.M. van and During, R. ( 2007) ‘The Difference Between Knowing the Path and Walking the Path: Een Essay over het Terugkerend Maakbaarheidsdenken in Beleidsonderzoek’ , Wageningen: Wageningen Universiteit, Leerstoelgroep Sociaal-ruimtelijke Analysehttp://lx1.library.wur.nl/way/bestanden/clc/1861989.pdf.
12.
Foucault, M.([1977] 2002) ‘Discipline and Punish’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader, pp. 181-204. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
13.
-- ( 1980) Power and Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.
14.
-- ( 1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. Dreyfus and R. Rabinow (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics . Brighton: Harvester Press.
15.
Fuchs, D. ( 2005) ‘Commanding Heights? The Strength and Fragility of Business Power in Global Politics’, Millennium33(3): 771-803.
16.
Garcia, R.M.R. ( 2001) ‘Scientia Potestas Est - Knowledge is Power: Francis Bacon to Michel Foucault’, Neohelicon, 28(1): 109-22.
17.
Geels, F.W. ( 2005) Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18.
Geels, F. and Kemp, R. ( 2000) ‘Transities vanuit sociotechnisch perspectief’. Report for the DutchMinistry of Environment, The Hague.
19.
Giddens, A. ([ 1984] 2002) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, in M. Haugaard ed. Power a Reader, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20.
Gordon, N. ( 2002) ‘On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault’, Human Studies25: 125-45.
21.
Grin, J. ( 2005) ‘Reflexive Modernization as a Governance Issue - Or: Designing and Shaping Re-Structuration’, in J-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht and R. Kemp (eds) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22.
Haan, J. de ( 2007) ‘Pillars of Change: A Theoretical Framework for Transition Models’, paper presented at the EESE 2007 Conference Integrating Natural and Social Sciences for Sustainability .
23.
Haugaard, M., ed., (2002) Power: A Reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
24.
Heiskala, R. ( 2001) ‘Theorizing Power: Weber, Parsons, Foucault and Neostructuralism’, Social Science Information40(2): 241-64.
25.
Hendriks, C.M. and Grin, J. ( 2007) ‘Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: The Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3-4): 333-50.
26.
Infinito, J. ( 2003) ‘Ethical Self-formation: A Look at the Later Foucault’ , Educational Theory53(2):155-71.
27.
Inglis, D. and Bone, J. ( 2006) ‘Boundary Maintenance, Border Crossing and the Nature/Culture Divide’, European Journal of Social Theory9(2): 272-87.
28.
Kemp, R. and Loorbach, D. ( 2006) ‘Transition management: A Reflexive Governance Approach’ , in J-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht and R. Kemp (eds) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham , UK: Edward Elgar.
29.
Lemke, D. and Kugler, J. ( 1996) ‘The Evolution of the Power Transition Perspective’ , in J. Kugler and D. Lemke (eds) Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of the War Ledger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30.
Levy, D. and Scully, M. ( 2007) ‘The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince: The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields’, Organization Studies28(07): 971-91.
31.
Loorbach, D. ( 2007) ‘Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development’, PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Utrecht: International Books.
32.
Loorbach, D. and Rotmans, J. ( 2005) ‘Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development’ , in A.J. Wiczorak and X. Olshoorn (eds) Industrial Transformation: Disciplinary Approaches towards Transformation Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33.
Luhmann, N. ( 1984) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
Lukes, S. ( 1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
35.
Machiavelli, N. ( 1532) The Prince. London: Everyman.
36.
Mann, M. ([ 1986] 2002) ‘The Sources of Social Power’, Vol.1, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
37.
Mills, C.W. ( 1956) The Power Elites. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
-- ( 2003) ‘Contesting the Political: Butler and Foucault on Power and Resistance’, The Journal of Political Philosophy11(3): 253-72.
39.
Morriss, P.([1987] 2002) ‘Power: A Philosophical Analysis’, in M. Haugaard ed. Power: A Reader, pp. 278-303. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
40.
Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G. ( 2001) ‘The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory; The Challenge of Conceptualisation’, Urban Affairs Review36(6): 810-35.
41.
Parsons, T. ( 1967) On the Concept of Political Power: Sociological Theory and Modern Society. London: Free Press.
42.
Rip, A. and Kemp, R. ( 1998) ‘Technological Change’, in S. Rayner and E. Malone (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 2, pp. 327-99. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
43.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R. and Asselt, M. ( 2001) ‘More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy’, The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 3(1): 15-32.
44.
Rotmans, J. ( 2005) ‘Societal Innovation: Between Dream and Reality Lies Complexity’, inaugural speech. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
45.
Shove, E. and Walker, G. ( 2007) ‘CAUTION! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Pratice, and Sustainable Transition Management’, Environment and Planning A39: 763-70.
46.
-- ( 2008) ‘Transition Management and the Politics of Shape Shifting’, Environment and Planning A, 40: 1012-14
47.
Stewart, A. ( 2001) Theories of Power and Domination: The Politics of Empowerment in Late Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
48.
Thompson, K. ( 2003) ‘Forms of Resistance: Foucault on Tactical Reversal and Selfformation’, Continental Philosophy Review36: 113-38.
49.
Voss, J.P., Newig, J., Kastens, B., Monstadt, J. and Nolting, B. ( 2007) ‘Steering for Sustainable Development: A Typology of Problems and Strategies with Respect to Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed Power’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning , 9 (3-4): 193-212.
