This article proposes a post-Austinian approach to performativity by drawing from Peircean semeiotics. The argument proceeds on three fronts. First, we establish how the performativity approach of John L. Austin has served as a model case for performativity research, but the problems of this are currently being seen in the fragmentation and nominalism of the field. Second, we argue that the problem with Austin’s ‘doing things with words’ approach to performativity is that it cannot account for performativity on its own terms as sui generis. Third, using Peircean semeiotics, we reconstruct certain post-Austinian tendencies in performativity research and propose a formal model of performativity that draws especially from what Peirce called an Immediate interpretant. We conclude the article by discussing three distinct performativities not related by a model case but as examples of the same objective possibility.
AbbottA. (2016). Processual sociology. University of Chicago Press.
2.
AkuruguC. (2021). Gender performativity in rural northern Ghana: Implications for transnational feminist theorizing. Feminist Theory, 22(1), 43–62.
3.
AlexanderJ. (2004). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573.
4.
AustinJ. L. (1962 [1955]). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
5.
AustinJ. L. (1963 [1958]). Performative-constative. In CantonC. E. (Ed.), Philosophy and ordinary language (pp. 353–365). University of Illinois Press.
6.
AustinJ. L. (1979 [1961]). Performative utterances. In UrmsonJ. O.WarnockG. J. (Eds.), Philosophical papers (pp. 233–252). Clarendon Press.
7.
BarnesB. (1983). Social life as bootstrapped induction. Sociology, 17(4), 524–545.
8.
BarnesB. (1988). The nature of power. Polity Press.
9.
BarthesR. (1972). Mythologies. The Noonday Press.
10.
BernsteinR. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Polity Press.
11.
BloorD. (1983). Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. Columbia University Press.
12.
BoltanskiL. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Polity.
13.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
14.
BrundageJ. S. (2023). Representation and recognition: State sovereignty as performative. American Journal of Sociology, 128(5), 1335–1380.
15.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
16.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.
17.
CallonM. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In MacKenzieD.MuniesaF.SiuL. (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton University Press.
18.
DeleuzeG. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image. University of Minnesota Press.
19.
DerridaJ. (1977[1971]). Signature event context. In Glyph 1 (pp. 172–197). Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
EagletonT. (2003). After Theory. Basic Books.
21.
ForsterP. (2011). Pierce and the threat of nominalism. Cambridge University Press.
22.
FouweatherI.BosmaB. (2021). The desire to rethink power AND performativity AND proceess. Organization Studies, 42(12), 1795–1815.
23.
FuretF. (1981). Interpreting the French revolution. Cambridge University Press.
24.
GoffmanE. (1983). Felicity’s condition. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 1–53.
25.
GomezDCriadoT. (2021). Civilizing technologies for an ageing society? The perforamtivity of participatory methods in Socio-gerontechnology. In PeineAMarshallB.MartinW.NevenL. (Eds.) Socio-Gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary critical studies of ageing and technology. Routledge.
26.
GraeberD. (2012). The sword, the sponge, and the paradox of performativity. Social Analysis, 56(1), 25–42.
27.
GuggenheimM.KrauseM. (2012). How facts travel: The model systems of sociology. Poetics, 40(2), 101–117.
28.
HabermasJ. (1989 [1962]). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
29.
HabermasJ. (1995). Peirce and communication. In LainerK. (Ed.), Peirce and contemporary thought (pp. 243–266). Fordham University Press.
30.
HaltonE. (2004). The living gesture and the signifying moment. Symbolic Interaction, 27(1), 89–113.
31.
HarawayD. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_Oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
32.
HealyK. (2015). The performativity of networks. European Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 175–205.
33.
HirschmanD. (2015). Has performativity lost its punch?European Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 531–534.
34.
hooksb. (1991). Theory as liberatory practice. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 4(1), 1–12.
35.
KasnitzD. (2020). The politics of disability performativity: An autoethnography. Current Anthropology, 61(S21), s16–s26.
36.
KerrA.BarryM.KelleherJ. (2020). Expectations of artificial intelligence and the performativity of ethics. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 1–12.
37.
KnappS.MichaelsW. B. (1982). Against theory. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 723–742.
38.
Knorr-CetinaK. (1992). The couch, the laboratory and the cathedral: On the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In PickeringA. (Ed.), Science in practice and culture (pp. 113–138). University of Chicago Press.
39.
KrauseM. (2021). Model cases: On canonical research objects and sites. University of Chicago Press.
40.
KripkeS. (1972). Naming and Necessity. Princeton University Press.
41.
KuorikoskiJPöyhönenS. (2012). Looping kinds and social mechanisms. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 187–205.
42.
LatourB. (1990). The force and reason of experiment. In LeGrandH. E. (Ed.), Experimental inquiries (pp. 49–80). Kluwer.
43.
LatourB. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
44.
LawJ.SingletonV. (2000). Performing technology's stories: On social constructivism, performance and performativity. Technology and Culture41(4), 765–775.
45.
MarresN.StarkD. (2020). Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing. British Journal of Sociology, 71(3), 423–443.
46.
MacKenzieD. (2006). An engine, not a camera: How financial markets shape markets. MIT Press.
47.
MacKinnonC. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
48.
MarxK. (1978). For a ruthless criticism of everything existing. In TuckerR. C. (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (pp. 12–15). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1843)
49.
McDonnellT.BailC.TavoryI. (2017). A theory of resonance. Sociological Theory, 35(1), 1–14.
50.
MertonR. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126.
51.
MertonR. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.
52.
MertonR. (1987). Three fragments from a sociologist's notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 1–29.
53.
MilesC. (2020). Black rural feminist trap: Stylized gendered performativity in trap music. Journal of Hip Hop Studies, 7(1), 44–70.
54.
MoatiR. (2014). Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and ordinary language. Columbia University Press.
55.
MooreA. C. (2022). Signs and their temporality: The performative power of interpretation in the supreme court. Sociological Theory, 40(4), 322–341.
56.
MorganM.MorrisonM. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In MorganM.MorrisonM. (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 10–38). Cambridge University Press.
57.
NegtO.KlugeA. (2016 [1972]). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bougeois and proletarian public sphere. Verso.
58.
PeirceC. S. (1998). Excerpts from letters to lady Welby. In HouserN.KloeselC. (Eds.), The essential Peirce (Vol. 2, pp. 477–492). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1906-1908)
59.
PeirceC. S. (1998). Excerpts from letters to William James. In HouserN.KloeselC. (Eds.), The essential Peirce (Vol. 2, pp. 492–503). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1909)
60.
PinchT. (1993). “Testing - one, two, three…testing!” Toward a sociology of testing. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18(1), 25–41.
