Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit

Abstract

The 2016 referendum marked a watershed moment in the history of the United Kingdom. The public vote to leave the European Union (EU)—for a ‘Brexit’—brought an end to the country’s membership of the EU and set it on a fundamentally different course. Recent academic research on the vote for Brexit points to the importance of immigration as a key driver, although how immigration influenced the vote remains unclear. In this article, we draw on aggregate-level data and individual-level survey data from the British Election Study (BES) to explore how immigration shaped public support for Brexit. Our findings suggest that, specifically, increases in the rate of immigration at the local level and sentiments regarding control over immigration were key predictors of the vote for Brexit, even after accounting for factors stressed by established theories of Eurosceptic voting. Our findings suggest that a large reservoir of support for leaving the EU, and perhaps anti-immigration populism more widely, will remain in Britain, so long as immigration remains a salient issue.

Keywords

Brexit European Union Euroscepticism immigration referendum voting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashcroft

(2016) How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday and why, 24 June 2016. Available at: http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/ (accessed 5 April 2017).

Boomgaarden

Schuck

ART

Elenbaas

. (2011) Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics 12(2): 241–266.

Butler

Kitzinger

(1976) The 1975 Referendum. London; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carey

(2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics 3(4): 387–413.

Clarke

Whiteley

Goodwin

(2017) Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cutts

Goodwin

Milazzo

(2017) Defeat of the People’s Army? The 2015 British general election and the UK Independence Party (UKIP). Electoral Studies. Epub ahead of print 18 March 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.03.002.

De Vreese

Boomgaarden

(2005) Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics 6(1): 59–82.

Dennison

Goodwin

(2015) Immigration, issue ownership and the rise of UKIP. Parliamentary Affairs 68(1): 168–187.

Ford

Goodwin

(2014) Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. Abingdon: Routledge.

10.

Gabel

Scheve

(2007) Estimating the effect of elite communications on public opinion using instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science 51: 1013–1028.

11.

Goodwin

Milazzo

(2015) UKIP: Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Goodwin

(2011) New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party. Abingdon: Routledge.

13.

Goodwin

Heath

(2016) The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly 87(3): 323–332.

14.

Green

Strolovitch

Wong

(1998) Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology 104(2): 372–403.

15.

Heath

Tilley

(2005) British national identity and attitudes towards immigration. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 7(2): 119–132.

16.

Hooghe

Marks

(2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics 6(4): 419–443.

17.

Hopkins

(2010) Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review 104(1): 40–60.

18.

Kentmen-Cin

Erisen

(2017) Anti-immigration attitudes and the opposition to European integration: A critical assessment. European Union Politics 18(1): 3–25.

19.

Kuhn

(2012) Why Educational Exchange Programmes Miss Their Mark: Cross-Border Mobility, Education and European Identity. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(6): 994–1010.

20.

Lawton

Ackrill

(2016) Hard evidence: How areas with low immigration voted mainly for Brexit. The Conversation, 8 July. Available at: http://theconversation.com/hard-evidence-how-areas-with-low-immigration-voted-mainly-for-brexit-62138 (accessed 2 June 2017).

21.

Lubbers

(2008) Regarding the Dutch ‘nee’ to the European constitution: A test of the identity, utilitarian and political approaches to voting ‘no’. European Union Politics 9(1): 59–86.

22.

Lubbers

Scheepers

(2007) Explanations of political Euro-scepticism at the individual, regional and national levels. European Societies 9(4): 643–669.

23.

Luedtke

(2005) European integration, public opinion and immigration policy: Testing the impact of national identity. European Union Politics 6(1): 83–112.

24.

McLaren

(2006) Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

25.

McLaren

Johnson

(2007) Resources, group conflict and symbols: Explaining anti-immigration hostility in Britain. Political Studies 55(4): 709–732.

26.

McLaren

(2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics 64(2): 551–566.

27.

Maier

Baumert

. (2015) Measuring citizens’ implicit and explicit attitudes towards the European Union. European Union Politics 16: 396–385.

28.

Prosser

Mellon

Green

(2016) What mattered most to you when deciding how to vote in the EU referendum? British Election Study News, 11 July. Available at: http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-findings/what-mattered-most-to-you-when-deciding-how-to-vote-in-the-eu-referendum (accessed 5 April 2017).

29.

Startin

(2015) Have we reached a tipping point? The mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK. International Political Science Review 36(3): 311–323.

30.

Swales

(2016) Understanding the Leave vote. London: NatCen Social Research. Available at: http://natcen.ac.uk/media/1319222/natcen_brexplanations-report-final-web2.pdf (accessed 5 April 2017).

31.

Wilson

(2017) The UK, USA and Brexit. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19(3): 544–558.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB