Values and multilateralism in world politics

Abstract

This article examines the role of values in multilateral cooperation. We argue that multilateralism possesses core, non-instrumental values – namely, a spirit of collectivity, inclusivity over exclusivity, and negotiated governance – that distinguish it from other forms of international cooperation. These values, embedded within institutional frameworks and practices, may underpin multilateralism’s continued relevance in addressing contemporary foreign policy challenges, including great power competition, illiberal politics, and multipolarity. The article critiques the policy dichotomy between values and interests, identifying points of conceptual overlap and proposing that multilateralism provides a normative context through which divergent state preferences may be shaped and navigated. By distinguishing between formal, superficial, and substantive multilateralism, the article offers an analytical framework to evaluate the quality of multilateral engagement and its implications for global governance. It concludes by reflecting on multilateralism’s potential to address the complexities of contemporary world politics.

Keywords

cooperation global governance multilateralism values

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Snidal

(2002) Values and interests: International legalization in the fight against corruption. Journal of Legal Studies 31(S1): S142.

Atkins

(2013) A renewed social democracy for an ‘age of internationalism’: An interpretivist account of new labour’s foreign policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15(2): 175–191.

Chandler

(2003) Rhetoric without responsibility: The attraction of ‘ethical’ foreign policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(3): 295–316.

Chivvis

Geaghan-Breiner

(2024) Emerging powers and the future of American statecraft. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 9 April. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/04/emerging-powers-and-the-future-of-american-statecraft?lang=en (accessed 7 March 2025).

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (2003) Q&A what is the ‘coalition of the willing?’ Available at: www.nytimes.com/cfr/international/slot1_032803.html?mabReward=relbias%253As&module=Search (accessed 13 April 2024).

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (2022) What’s next for the WTO? CFR. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/whats-next-wto (accessed 13 April 2024).

D’Alessandra

(2024) Conceptualizing great power perpetrators. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 18(1): 151–189.

Derviş

(2021) Biden’s two types of multilateralism. Brookings, 10 September. Available at: https://intelligence.weforum.org/monitor/latest-knowledge/d93f63bec2214aa087b5729ac2b28a0e (accessed 8 March 2025).

Diebold

(1988) The history and the issues. In: Diebold

(ed.) Bilateralism, Multilateralism and Canada in U. S. Trade Policy. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.131–145.

10.

Dixon

Williams

(2001) Tough on debt, tough on the causes of debt? New Labour’s Third Way foreign policy. British Journal of Politics & International Relations: 150–172.

11.

Eckersley

(2012) Moving forward in the climate negotiations: Multilateralism or minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics 12(2): 24–42.

12.

Finnemore

(1996) National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

13.

Gaskarth

(2013) Interpreting ethical foreign policy: Traditions and dilemmas for policymakers. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15(2): 192–209.

14.

Ghez

Larrabee

(2009) France and NATO. Survival 21: 77–90.

15.

Gildea

(2024) Explaining the selection dilemma in human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly 68(2): sqae041.

16.

Gilmore

(2015) Still a ‘force for good’? Good international citizenship in British foreign and security policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17(1): 106–129.

17.

Gowan

(2022) The UN is another casualty of Russia’s war. Foreign Affairs, 10 March. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/west-africa/2022-03-10/un-another-casualty-russias-war (accessed 8 March 2025).

18.

Greve

(2021) Joe Biden and a New Era of multilateralism, GIGA Focus Global, 5. Hamburg: German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA).

19.

Hampson

Heinbecker

(2011) The ‘new’ multilateralism of the twenty-first century. Global Governance 17(3): 299–310.

20.

Hoover

(2015) Ethics and Morality in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Ikenberry

(2003) Is American multilateralism in decline? Perspectives on Politics 1(3): 533–550.

22.

Ikenberry

(2015) The future of multilateralism: Governing the world in a post-hegemonic era. Japanese Journal of Political Science 16(3): 399–413.

23.

IMF (2022) IMF Quotas. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/07/14/12/21/IMF-Quotas (accessed 13 April 2024).

24.

Keohane

(1990) Multilateralism: An agenda for research. International Journal 45(4): 731–764.

25.

Khalaf

Hall

Mallet

(2021) Emmanuel Macron: ‘For me, the key is multilateralism that produces results’. Financial Times, 18 February. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/d8b9629a-92b1-4e02-92b7-41e9152d56ea (accessed 8 March 2025).

26.

Koenig- Archibugi

(2011) Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 519–542.

27.

Kreps

(2011) Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.

28.

Lake

Martin

Risse

(2021) Challenges to the liberal order: Reflections on international organization. International Organization 75(2): 225–257.

29.

Lucarelli

Manners

(2006) Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.

30.

MacAskill

(2003) US claims 45 nations in ‘coalition of willing’. The Guardian. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/19/iraq.usa (accessed 13 April 2024).

31.

McCarthy

Wang

(2021) Xi Jinping pushes multilateral message before US democracy summit. South China Morning Post, 5 December. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3158550/chinas-xi-jinping-pushes-multilateral-message-ahead-us (accessed 8 March 2025)

32.

McElroy

(2014) Morality and American Foreign Policy: The Role of Ethics in International Affairs, Vol. 201. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33.

McGee

(2011) Exclusive minilateralism: An emerging discourse within international climate change governance? Portal: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 8(3): 1–29.

34.

Maizland

(2022) China and Russia: Exploring Ties between Two Authoritarian Powers. Council on Foreign Relations, December 11. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-russia-relationship-xi-putin-taiwan-ukraine (accessed 8 March 2025).

35.

Masters

Sergie

(2020) The Arab league. Council on Foreign Relations, 25 May. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/arab-league (accessed 8 March 2025).

36.

Mumford

Selck

(2010) New Labour’s ethical dimension: Statistical trends in Tony Blair’s foreign policy speeches. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12: 295–312.

37.

Naím

(2009) Minilateralism. Foreign Policy, 173. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/06/21/minilateralism/ (accessed 8 March 2025).

38.

Newman

(2007) A Crisis of Global Institutions? Multilateralism and International Security. Abingdon: Routledge.

39.

Ní Aoláin

(2022) Why pushing Russia out of multilateral institutions is not a solution to the war. Just Security, 22 March. Available at: https://www.justsecurity.org/80787/why-pushing-russia-out-of-multilateral-institutions-is-not-a-solution-to-the-war/ (accessed 8 March 2025).

40.

Nye

(1999) Redefining the national interest. Foreign Affairs 78(4): 22–35.

41.

Nye

(2020) Do Morals Matter? Presidents and Foreign Policy from FDR to Trump. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

42.

O’Brien

Goetz

Scholte

, et al. (2000) Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Pouliot

(2011) Multilateralism as an end in itself. International Studies Perspectives 12(1): 18–26.

44.

Pouliot

(2016) International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

45.

Pouliot

Thérien

(2023) Global Policymaking, Vol. 162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Rathbun

Kertzer

Reifler

, et al. (2016) Taking foreign policy personally: Personal values and foreign policy attitudes. International Studies Quarterly 60(1): 124–137.

47.

Rettman

(2022) Western public has ‘moral’ duty to Ukraine, NATO chief says. EU Observer, 18 June. Available at: https://euobserver.com/eu-and-the-world/arfe7ddcd2 (accessed 8 March 2025).

48.

Ruggie

(1992) Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization 46(3): 561–598.

49.

Sagiv

Schwartz

(2022) Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology 5: 517–546.

50.

Sanger

Erlanger

(2025) Trump team leaves behind an alliance in crisis. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/16/us/politics/trump-europe-alliance-crisis.html (accessed 18 February 2025).

51.

Shapiro

(2009) The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

52.

Smith

(2018) The EU, the US and the crisis of contemporary multilateralism. Journal of European Integration 40(5): 539–553.

53.

The White House (2011) Remarks by the president in address to the nation on Libya. Available online: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/28/remarks-President-address-nation-libya (accessed 13 April 2024).

54.

United Nations (2021) Secretary-general stresses need for more networked, inclusive multilateralism, in International Day of Diplomacy Message. United Nations. Available at: https://press.un.org/en/2021/sgsm20699.doc.htm (accessed 13 April 2024).

55.

United Nations (2022) Warning commitment to multilateralism, diplomacy for peace is being broken, secretary-general observance message urges stronger global cooperation meetings coverage and press releases. Available online: https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21244.doc.htm (accessed 13 April 2024).

56.

United Nations (2024) Secretary-general’s remarks at the opening segment of the summit of the future plenary. Available at: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2024-09-22/secretary-generals-remarks-the-opening-segment-of-the-summit-of-the-future-plenary-bilingual-delivered-scroll-down-for-all-english-and-all-french#:~:text=We%20are%20here%20to%20bring,values%20of%20the%20UN%20Charter (accessed 14 December 2024).

57.

United Nations (2024b) The virtues of multilateralism and diplomacy. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/observances/multilateralism-for-peace-day#:~:text=Multilateralism%20is%20therefore%20both%20a,organization%20of%20the%20international%20system (accessed 13 April 2024).

58.

United Nations (2024c) Pact for the future. Available at: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-pact_for_the_future_adopted.pdf (accessed 14 December 2024).

59.

United Nations (2024d) World population division: World population prospects 2024. Available at: https://population.un.org/wpp/ (accessed 04 December 2024).

60.

United States Department of State (2003) Daily press briefing, 18 March. Available at: https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2003/18809.htm (accessed 13 April 2024).

61.

Wendt

(1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Vol. 67. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

62.

Williams

(2023) Why the five eyes? Power and identity in the formation of a multilateral intelligence grouping. Journal of Cold War Studies 25(1): 101–137.

63.

Zakaria

(1997) The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs 6: 22.

64.

Ziliotti

(2020) Democracy’s value: A conceptual map. The Journal of Value Inquiry 54(3): 407–427.

65.

Zürn

(2021) Multilateralism in crisis: A European perspective 1. In: Meyer

de Sales Marques

Telò

(eds) Towards a New Multilateralism. London: Routledge, pp.119–131.