Erratum to Design of precast UHPFRC retaining walls – Experimental and numerical validations

Sylvestre D, Charron J-P and Massicotte B. Design of precast UHPFRC retaining walls – Experimental and numerical validations. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2023. doi:10.1177/13694332231222087

In the above-referenced article Figures 14 to 15 were inadvertently published incorrect, correct Figures are as:

Figure 14: This figure should be labeled Figure 15 and placed accordingly in the paper.

Figure 15: This figure should be labeled Figure 16 and placed accordingly in the paper.

Figure 16: This figure should be labeled Figure 14 and placed accordingly in the paper.

Figure 14. Deformed shape and crack pattern for different stiffener geometry configurations at ULS (Deformation scale = ×10; Crack opening filter = 0.1 mm). (a) Config. 3. (b) Config. 3b. (c) Config. 3c. (d) Config. 3d.

Figure 15. Numerical comparison for different UHPFRC-3% stiffener geometries. (a) Moment – Deflection at H = 3 m. (b) Moment - Crack opening.

Figure 16. Admissible lateral pressure in stem components, (a) stem panel vs stem stiffener capacity, (b) tensile stress distribution and cracking for the NL Panel - Stem panel capacity model. (a). (b).

The referenced article has been corrected accordingly.