Abstract
In the current scenario, Alzheimer's disease is a complex, challenging, and arduous health issue, and its prevalence, together with comorbidities, is accelerating around the universe. Alzheimer's disease is becoming a primary concern that significantly impacts an individual's status in life. The traditional treatment of Alzheimer's disease includes some synthetic drugs, which have numerous dangerous side effects, a high risk of recurrence, lower bioavailability, and limited treatment. Hence, the current article is a detailed study and review of all known information on plant-derived compounds as natural anti-Alzheimer's agents, including their biological sources, active phytochemical ingredients, and a possible mode of action. With the help of a scientific data search engine, including the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI/PubMed), Science Direct, and Google Scholar, analysis from 2001 to 2024 has been completed. This article also described clinical studies on phytoconstituents used to treat Alzheimer's disease. Plant-derived compounds offer promising alternatives to synthetic drugs in treating Alzheimer's disease, with the potential for improving cognitive function and slowing down the progression of the disease. Further research and clinical trials are needed to fully explore their therapeutic potential and develop effective strategies for managing this complex condition.
Keywords
Introduction
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the progressive loss of both the structural and functional elements of the peripheral nervous system and the central nervous system. 1 Neuronal death leads to the onset of various neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and stroke. 2 AD is the most observable form of dementia in aged people, 3 characterized by the progressive deterioration of memory and other cognitive functions. 4 Memory loss is the key symptom of AD. 5 Major hypotheses for AD include amyloid and cholinergic hypotheses and additional risk factors like genetic problems, aging, head injuries, infections, vascular disorders, and environmental factors. 6 Recent research has demonstrated that the genesis of AD is significantly influenced by the inhibition of oxidative stress and target enzymes like cholinesterase, β-secretase, and monoamine oxidase, as well as by the suppression of tau protein hyperphosphorylation and amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque aggregation, inflammatory responses, and unfolded protein responses. 7 The comorbidities due to AD include hypertension, depression, osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, and others.
The FDA-approved medications for the treatment of AD are cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine), glutamate regulators (memantine), and orexin receptor antagonists (suvorexant), and novel anti-amyloid antibodies (aducanumab). 8 The availability of these pharmaceuticals and their potentially hazardous side effects restrict their usage. As a result, developing an effective, safe, economical, and cost-efficient drug is essential. Recent studies indicate that natural products might exert therapeutic potential against AD and recommend that herbal drugs are alternatives to synthetic drugs in managing AD. 9 The efficacious usage of these herbal drugs will enhance anti-AD effects by acting on numerous targets associated with AD with lower side effects. 10 Therefore, herbal plants and their derivatives are practical approaches to treating AD.
In recent years, researchers have found many active compounds in herbs, and such bioactives have targeted the therapeutic potential of herbal products against AD with fewer adverse effects than conventional drugs. 11 This review highlights the recent research contributions from different academics worldwide in herbal-based AD treatment. The present study covers the trends in epidemiological data, pathogenesis, and herbs with their phytochemicals and mechanism of action against AD. This review also discusses the country-wise research carried out from 2001 to 2021. Figure 1 depicts the workflow for the literature selection process.

Flowchart of the literature selection process.
Epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease
AD is the most familiar and common type of dementia, accounting for 60 to 70% of all cases, and around 5 million new cases are found annually. Dementia affects more than 50 million people in the world today, and by 2050, the total figure of patients is expected to triple, the majority of whom have AD.12,13 Turkey, Lebanon, Libya, and Finland have higher death rates because of AD as compared to other countries in the world.
Pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease
AD is characterized by a complex interplay of pathological processes contributing to its pathophysiology. Key factors involved in AD include the deposition of extracellular Aβ, tau protein abnormalities, oxidative neuronal damage, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), neuroinflammation, genetic mutations, dysregulation of neurotransmitters, and various molecular and cellular pathways; represented in Figure 2. Deposition of the extracellular Aβ due to neurotoxicity is the main reason for AD.14–16

Various pathways involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.
Extracellular deposition of Aβ plays a central role in AD. Aβ peptides are derived from the cleavage of amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP) and can aggregate to form insoluble plaques. These plaques disrupt normal neuronal function and activate inflammatory responses. Aβ oligomers, intermediate forms of Aβ aggregation, are particularly toxic to neurons and contribute to synaptic dysfunction and neurotoxic cascades. Tau protein abnormalities contribute to intracellular NFT formation. Tau is a microtubule-associated protein involved in maintaining neuronal structure and transport. In AD, tau becomes hyperphosphorylated, leading to its detachment from microtubules and aggregation into NFTs. These tangles disrupt neuronal integrity, impair axonal transport, and contribute to cognitive decline.
Oxidative stress is a prominent feature of AD pathophysiology. Excessive production of reactive oxygen species overwhelms the antioxidant defense mechanisms, leading to neuron oxidative damage. Mitochondrial dysfunction, Aβ-induced oxidative stress, and inflammation contribute to reactive oxygen species generation. Oxidative stress results in lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction, further exacerbating neuronal injury and synaptic dysfunction.
Neuroinflammation plays a significant role in AD. Microglial cells, the brain's immune cells, are activated in response to Aβ accumulation and NFT formation. Activated microglia release pro-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to Aβ production, tau pathology, and neuronal damage. Peripheral immune cells are also recruited, amplifying the inflammatory response and contributing to neuroinflammation.
Genetic mutations are implicated in familial forms of AD. Mutations in genes such as APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 affect Aβ production or metabolism, directly contributing to AD pathology. Risk factors such as advanced age, the APOE ε4 allele, and lifestyle factors influence AD susceptibility and disease progression. Dysregulation of neurotransmitters is observed in AD. Cholinergic dysfunction, characterized by the degeneration of cholinergic neurons and reduced acetylcholine levels, contributes to cognitive impairment. Other neurotransmitter systems, including glutamate and serotonin, are also affected, leading to excitotoxicity, synaptic dysfunction, and behavioral and psychiatric symptoms.
AD involves various molecular and cellular pathways, including factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), extracellular regulated kinases (ERK1/2), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mTOR, extracellular regulated kinases (ERK1/2), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), along with others. Dysregulated AβPP processing leads to the production of different Aβ species with varying degrees of aggregation and neurotoxicity. Tau kinases, such as glycogen synthase kinase-3β, contribute to abnormal tau phosphorylation and NFT formation. Disrupted calcium homeostasis, impaired insulin signaling, compromised autophagy, lysosomal degradation, and altered synaptic plasticity contribute to AD pathophysiology.
Emerging pathways and mechanisms have gained attention in AD research. Mitochondrial dysfunction, vascular abnormalities, epigenetic modifications, and the gut-brain axis are emerging areas of investigation. Mitochondrial dysfunction affects energy production and increases oxidative stress. Vascular abnormalities lead to reduced cerebral blood flow and metabolic disturbances. Epigenetic modifications influence gene expression patterns and may contribute to AD development. The gut-brain axis involves bidirectional communication between the gut microbiota and the brain and has been implicated in AD pathophysiology.17,18
Trends based upon natural anti-AD agents
The present study is based on a colossal numeral of literature gathered from scientifically authenticated sources like NCBI/PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar.
Table 1 depicts some significant advancements in natural medicinal development in treating AD. It includes a list of natural anti-Alzheimer's agents and information on their biological sources, families, chemical composition, parts used, and potential mode of action.
Various representative herbs and their parts used, pharmacological action, and active phytoconstituents.
AChE: acetylcholinesterase; AβPP: amyloid-β protein precursor; Aβ: amyloid-β; BACE1, β secretase; BChE, butyrylcholinesterase; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; ChAT: choline acetyltransferase; ChE: cholinesterase; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; DMPD: dimethyl-4-phenylenediamine; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ERK: extracellular regulated kinases; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power; FRET: fluorescence resonance energy transfer; GSK-3β: glycogen synthase kinase-3β; ICAM: intercellular adhesion molecule; IL: Interleukin; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; NGF: nerve growth factor; NO: nitric oxide; PGE2: prostaglandin E2; PI3K: phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase; pTau: phospho-Tau; PTP1B: protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B; RAGE: receptor of advanced glycation end products; ROS: reactive oxygen species; TACE: TNF-α-converting enzyme; TLC: thin layer chromatography; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; TrkB: tropomyosin-related kinase B.
According to this review, there are 64 families of herbal plants, and around 23 parts demonstrated anti-AD activity. The families, including Leguminosae, Lamiaceae, Apiaceae, Rubiaceae, and Moraceae, devote a large number of anti-AD agents (Figure 3). More than 15 different anti-AD mechanisms have been discovered in phytoconstituents from these plants. The plants from the Leguminosae family inhibit the Aβ aggregation, AChE, BChE, AβPP, and BACE1, anti-amyloidogenic, blockage of NF-kB pathway, NO, PGE2 (anti-inflammatory and antioxidant), pro-inflammatory mediators, TNF-α, IL-8, MCP-1, IL-1β (cytokines), and ICAM-1, along with others. The most common mechanism behind the anti-AD activity is inhibiting the cholinesterase enzyme (BChE/AChE); the second most common mechanism is the antioxidant-mediated effect. Only a few researchers, however, have focused on the particular molecular mechanism responsible for anti-AD action. As a result, the expanding threat of AD to world health has prompted experts and researchers to devote more time and exercise to identifying an effective molecular mode of action.

Plants associated with several families having anti-AD action.
It is observed from Figure 4 that Korea is first, China is second, India is third in phytochemical research against AD, followed by Iran, Brazil, and Japan. It has been noted that research efforts are gradually growing day by day for the evaluation of potent anti-AD phytochemicals in the management of AD. Research done in the year 2021 is more than in other years, indicating a growing interest of researchers in investigating the therapeutic application of plant-derived compounds in treating AD (Figure 5).

Country-wise research trends.

Year-wise research was done to estimate trends of natural anti-AD agents.
Figure 6 illustrates phytochemicals derived from various plant parts exhibiting anti-AD activity, and analysis reveals that phytochemicals obtained from leaves exhibit the highest and most significant therapeutic potential against AD, followed by roots, fruits, bark, and seeds. This information holds valuable implications for selecting specific plant parts for further investigation in herbal plant research related to AD. However, there is another aspect that we should not miss: the common observation that not all plant parts have been explored for all the medicinal plants. So, in the present case, it would be more appropriate to indicate leaves as the most explored plant part for anti-AD potential.

Different parts of the plants have anti-AD activity.
Figure 7 summarizes the different modes of action by which various plants demonstrated their anti-AD activity. Most plants showed anti-AD activity by inhibiting the cholinesterase enzyme (BChE/AChE), followed by antioxidant activity.

Graphical representation of different modes of action shown by various natural anti-AD phytochemicals.
As data is given in Figure 8, alkaloids play a vital role in treating AD, followed by flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, and many more. We could also mention alkaloids are the most explored phytochemical class in evaluating anti-AD potential.

The different phytochemical classes responsible for anti-AD activity.
Clinical studies
Clinical trials have been conducted recently to assess their therapeutic efficacy and potential side effects. Nicotine was the first natural product studied in a clinical trial study in 1992. Several other compounds, such as vitamins, were studied in clinical trials for AD therapy during the 1990s. 185 The use of natural products in clinical trials has recently gained popularity. Through a webinar in 2017, the National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) announced new funding opportunities for natural product clinical trials. 186
A detailed report of clinical trial studies on natural products used to treat AD is described in Table 2.
Natural products that were used in the clinical trial studies for AD.
Conclusion
AD is expanding at a frightening rate worldwide in old age people. AD and its comorbidities are generally lethal if not treated. Thus, to effectively manage and treat AD, numerous countries focus on research and development activities. Natural anti-Alzheimer's agents derived from plants might be promising alternatives to synthetic drugs in managing and treating AD. These plant-derived compounds have shown potential for improving cognitive function and slowing down the progression of the disease. However, it is essential to ensure the safety and efficacy of these phytoconstituents through rigorous toxicological studies and clinical trials. Additionally, further research is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the anti-Alzheimer's activity of these natural compounds, allowing for the development of more targeted and effective therapies. The exploration of plant-derived compounds in AD treatment will continue to be an area of significant interest and focus of future research, with the ultimate goal of providing improved care and management options for individuals affected by AD.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors have no acknowledgments to report.
Author contributions
Kalpesh Mahajan (Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Visualization; Writing – original draft); Sanjay Sharma (Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Writing – review & editing); Rupesh K Gautam (Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Project administration; Supervision; Writing – review & editing); Rajat Goyal (Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Visualization; Writing – original draft); Dinesh Kumar Mishra (Formal analysis; Validation; Writing – review & editing); Rajeev K Singla (Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Project administration; Supervision; Writing – review & editing).
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
