This study analyzes the impact of spiralling growth in usage of contractual labour, in the context of stringent pro-worker labour regulations, on industrial labour productivity and employment generation. We obtain a quantitative measure of ‘stringency of labour regulations’ by applying majority rule on three different measures used in the literature. The results show that average labour productivity increases with the increase in the ratio of permanent workers to contractual workers, unless the industries are not operating in states having rigid/pro-worker labour regulations—which implies a negative impact of contractualization on labour productivity. Besides, the results show that the rigid/pro-worker labour regulations have negative impact on employment generation; it is especially discernible in labour-intensive industries.
AdhvaryuA.ChariA.V.SharmaS. (2014). Firing costs and flexibility: Evidence from firms’ employment responses to shocks in India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 725–740.
2.
AghionP.RobinB.StephenR.FabrizioZ. (2008). The unequal effects of liberalization: Evidence from dismantling the license raj in India. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1397–1412.
3.
AhsanA.PagesC. (2009). Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37, 62–75.
4.
BertolaG. (1990). Job security, employment, and wages. European Economic Review, 34(4), 851–856.
5.
BertrandM.DuffloE.MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust difference in differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
6.
BesleyT.BurgessR. (2004). Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.
7.
BhattacharjeaA. (2006). Labor market regulation and industrial performance in India: A critical review of the empirical evidence. The Indian Journal of Labor Economics, 49(2), 211–32.
8.
BoteroJ.DjankovS.PortaR.L.Lopez-De-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (2004). The regulation of labour. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339–1382.
9.
CaballeroR.J.HammourM.L. (1998). Jobless growth: Appropriability, factor substitution, and unemployment. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48, 51–94.
10.
CaliM.SenK. (2011). Do effective state-business relations matter for economic growth?: Evidences from Indian states. World Development, 39(9), 1542–1557.
DoughertyS.M.RoublesV.C.KrishnaK. (2013). State-level labor reform and firm-level productivity in India. New Delhi: Brookings–NCAER India Policy Forum.
11.
Uchikawa (Ed.), Labor market and institution in India, 1990s and beyond. New Delhi: Manohar.
12.
GoldarB. (2009). Impact of trade on employment generation in manufacturing in India. Working Paper Series No. E/297/2009, IEG, New Delhi.
13.
GuptaP.HassanR.KumarU. (2009, February). Big reforms but small payoffs: Explaining the weak record of growth and employment in Indian manufacturing. India Policy Forum, 5, 59–108.
14.
HopenhaynH.RogersonR. (1993). Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 915–938.
15.
LindbeckA.SnowerD. (1987). Union activity, unemployment persistence and wage-employment ratchets. European Economic Review, 31(1–2), 157–167.
16.
MaitiD. (2009). Institutions, networks and industrialization: Field level evidence of fragmentation and flexibility from India. IIPG Discussion Papers.
17.
MitraD.UralB.P. (2008). Indian manufacturing: A slow sector in a rapid growing economy. Journal of International Trade and Economy Development, 17(4), 525–559.
18.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). OECD Economic Surveys: India, 2007(14).
19.
PierreG.ScarpettaS. (2013). Do firms make greater use of training and temporary employment when labor adjustment costs are high?IZA Journal of Labor Policy. doi: 10.1186/2193-9004-2-15
20.
RamaswamyK.V. (1999). The search for flexibility in Indian manufacturing: New evidence on outsourcing activities. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(6), 363–368.
21.
SahaB.SenK.MaitiD. (2013). Trade openness, labour institutions, and flexibilisaion: Theory and evidence from India. Labor Economics, 24, 180–195.
22.
SapkalR.S. (2014). Labour regulation, enforcement and the incidence of contract workers: Empirical evidences from organized Indian manufacturing sector. Working Paper Series No. 4.
23.
SunderS. (2012). Contract labour in India: Issues and perspectives. New Delhi: Daanish Books.
