The cherished goal of speedy economic growth in the Asian regional blocs cannot be achieved without attaining income convergence among them. Economic integration and assessment of income convergence or disparities among Asian blocs is the aim of this study. This study assesses a number of factors, such as trade openness, foreign direct investment, intellectual property rights protection and governance, to see how open economies are integrating themselves while competing with each other. Findings reveal that the SAARC group has not shown intra-regional income convergence, while the ASEAN group provides sufficient evidence. Although simultaneously considering SAARC and ASEAN groups in the form of a panel, there is evidence of non-convergence between the two regional groups. An important policy implication of the study is that the ASEAN and SAARC blocs are in dire need for combined and collective policy framework at the regional level.
AhmadE.NazA. (2000). An empirical analysis of convergence hypothesis [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 39(4), 729–740.
2.
AhmedS.GhaniS. E. (2008). Making regional cooperation work for South Asia’s poor. In AhmedSadiqKelegamaSamanGhaniEjaz (Eds.), Promoting economic cooperation in South Asia: Beyond SAFTA (pp. 30–68). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
3.
BandaraJ. S.YuW. (2003). How desirable is the South Asian Free Trade Area? A quantitative economic assessment. The World Economy, 26(9), 1293–1323.
4.
BarroR. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
5.
BarroR. J.Sala-i-MartinX. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.
6.
BarroR. J.Sala-i-MartinX. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 1–27.
7.
BaumolW. J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long-run data show. The American Economic Review, 76(5)1072–1085.
8.
Ben-DavidD. (1993). Equalizing exchange: Trade liberalization and income convergence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 653–679.
9.
BlomstromM.KokkoA. (1997). Regional integration and foreign direct investment (NBER Working Paper No. 6019). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
BlundellR.BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
11.
CyrusT. (2004). Does convergence cause trade, or does trade cause convergence?The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 13(4), 397–418.
12.
DervişK.KharasH. (Eds.) (2014). Growth, convergence and income distribution: An introduction. In Growth, convergence and income distribution: The road from the Brisbane G–20 summit (pp. 1–10). Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.
13.
EatonJ.KortumS. (1996) Trade in ideas patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 40(3), 251–278.
GasslerH.FrohlichJ.KopcsaA. (1996). Selective information on the national system of innovation as an important input for the technology management of firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(3–4), 329–342.
16.
GrossmanG. M.HelpmanE. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35(2–3), 517–526.
17.
HakroA. N.FidaB. A. (2009). Trade and income convergence in selected South Asian countries and their trading partners. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 14(2), 49–70.
18.
HayashiT. (1999). R&D capabilities of eastern Asian countries—Centering on Asian NIES. In InzeltAnnamáriaHiltonJan (Eds.) Technology transfer: From invention to innovation (pp. 233–254). Springer Netherlands.
19.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(6), 1251–1271.
20.
HelpmanE.KrugmanP. R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
21.
HultonC. (1996). Infrastructure capital and economic growth: How well you use it may be more important than how much you have (NBER Working Paper No. 5847). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
22.
ImK. S.PesaranM. H.ShinY. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
23.
IslamN. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127–1170.
24.
IqbalM. J. (2006). SAARC: Origin, growth, potential and achievements. Pakistan Journal of History and Culture, 27(2), 127–140.
25.
JonesC. I. (1995). R & D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784.
26.
LamaM. (2010). SAARC programs and activities: Assessment, monitoring, and evaluation. In AhmedS.KelegamaS.GhaniE. (Eds.), Promoting economic cooperation in South Asia: Beyond SAFTA (pp. 402–422). New Delhi: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9788132107965.n17
27.
LevinA.LinC. F. (1993). Unit root tests in panel data: New results (Economics Working Paper No. 56). San Diego, CA: University of California.
28.
LevinA.LinC. F.ChuC. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
29.
LucasR. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
30.
MahmoodI. P.SinghJ. (2003). Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy, 32(6), 1031–1054.
31.
MankiwN. G.PhelpsE. S.RomerP. M. (1995). The growth of nations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 275–326.
32.
QuahD. (2014). Convergence determines governance—within and without. In DervisK.KharasH. (Eds), Growth, convergence, and income distribution (pp. 179–184). Washington, DC: Brookings.
33.
RamseyF. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559.
34.
RassekhF.ThompsonH. (1998). Micro convergence and macro convergence: Factor price equalization and per capita income. Pacific Economic Review, 3(1), 3–11.
35.
Rivera-BatizL. A.RomerP. M. (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531–555.
36.
RomerP. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
37.
RomerP. M. (1986). (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.
38.
Sala-i-MartinX. X. (1996). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1325–1352.
39.
SamuelsonP. A. (1948). International trade and the equalization of factor prices. The Economic Journal, 58(230), 163–184.
40.
SamuelsonP. A. (1949). International factor-price equalization once again. The Economic Journal, 59(234), 181–197.
41.
SamuelsonP. A. (1953). Prices of factors and goods in general equilibrium. The Review of Economic Studies, 1–20.
42.
SamuelsonP. A. (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 467–482.
43.
StroomerC.GilesD. E. (2008). Real output convergence and trade openness: Fuzzy clustering and time series evidence. The International Trade Journal, 22(2), 115–155.
44.
SolarinS. A.AhmedE. M.DahalanJ. (2014). Income convergence dynamics in ASEAN and SAARC blocs. New Zealand Economic Papers, 48(3), 285–300.
45.
SolowR. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.
46.
SwanT. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2), 334–361.
47.
TakatoshiI. (2017). Growth convergence and the middle-income trap. Asian Development Review, 34(1), 1–27.
TokumaruN. (2009). Technology accumulation in East Asia: A statistical analysis of the uneven accumulation of technological competence. Economies Etsociétés, 43(6), 1015–1030.
50.
USPTO. (2016). Annual reports. Alexandria, VA: United States Patent and Trademark Office.
51.
WichmannT. (1996). Technology adoption in agriculture and convergence across economies (Berlecon Research Paper No. 02). Berlin: Berlecon Research.
