The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire in Germany: From the validation of the instrument to the formation of a job-specific database of psychosocial factors at work

Abstract

The German version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) was established and tested in a sample of 2561 employees in order to: (a) assess the questionnaires’ psychometric properties; and (b) develop an appropriate instrument to use in the assessment of psychosocial risk factors. A shortened version of the instrument was developed, reducing the number of items from 141 to 87. With this, a database has been established since 2005. In a cooperation model between science (Freiburg Research Centre of Occupational and Social Medicine) and companies or organizations, new COPSOQ data are added to the dynamically growing database with profession-specific profiles of psychosocial factors at work. In return, companies can compare their results with job-related data in the database, facilitating the interpretation of their results and the implementation of improvement measures. The COPSOQ database has reached >25,000 respondents. Ongoing projects will expand the German COPSOQ database and include representative samples. Furthermore, a job exposure matrix for psychosocial factors at work will be constructed in 2009. Finally, in several projects, a first assessment has been followed by efforts to improve the problematic areas of psychosocial working conditions.

Keywords

Psychosocial factors assessment reference data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kristensen TS

Borg V.

AMI’s spørgeskema om psykisk arbejdsmiljø. Copenhagen: National Institute of Occupational Health; 2000.

Kristensen TS

Hannerz H.

Høgh A.

Borg V.

The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) - a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health2005 ;31:438-49.

Nuebling M.

Stößel U.

Hasselhorn H-M.

Michaelis M.

Hofmann F.

Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen - Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ). Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Fb 1058. Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverlag NW; 2005.

Nuebling M.

Stößel U.

Hasselhorn H-M.

Michaelis M.

Hofmann F.

Measuring psychological stress and strain at work: evaluation of the COPSOQ Questionnaire in Germany . GMS Psychosoc Med2006;3:Doc05. Available at: http://www.egms.de/en/journals/psm/2006-3/psm000025.shtml.

Kaempf S.

Krause A.

Gefährdungsbeurteilungen zur Analyse psychischer Belastungen am Arbeitsort Schule. In:

Bungard W

Koop B

Liebig C

, editors. Psychologie und Wirtschaft leben - Aktuelle Themen der Wirtschaftspsychologie in Forschung und Praxis. München: Rainer Hampp; 2004. pp. 314-19.

Nuebling M.

Wirtz M.

Neuner R.

Krause A.

Ermittlung psychischer Belastungen bei Lehrkräften. Entwicklung eines Instruments für die Vollerhebung in Baden-Württemberg . Zbl Arbeitsmed2008;58:312-13.

Siegrist J.

Adverse health effects of high effort-low reward conditions at work. J Occup Health Psychol1996;1:27-43.

Siegrist J.

A theory of occupational stress. In:

Dunham J

, editor. Stress in the workplace. London: Whurr Publishers; 2001. pp. 52-66.

Karasek RA

Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q1979;24:285-308.

10.

Karasek RA

Theorell T.

Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life . New York: Basic Books; 1990.

11.

Theorell T.

Hasselhorn HM

On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health - are they reliable?

Int Arch Occup Environ Health2005 ;78:517-22.

12.

Frese M.

Zapf D.

Methodological issues in the study of work stress: objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In:

Cooper CL

Payne R

, editors. Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. New York: Wiley; 1988. pp. 375-411.

13.

Kristensen TS

Job stress and cardiovascular disease: a theoretic critical review. J Occup Health Psychol1996 ;1:246-60.

14.

Kompier MAJ

Cooper CL

, editors. Preventing stress, improving productivity. European case studies in the workplace. London: Routledge; 1999. pp. 33-51.