Does patients’ choice of health centre doctor depend on the organization? A comparative study of four municipalities with different forms of service provision in Finland

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study was to examine the use of physician services and the willingness to choose an health centre (HC) doctor rather than an alternative (i.e. private, occupational healthcare, other doctor) by the working age population in four municipalities in Finland. In a Southern municipality primary health care was contracted out to a non-profit organization whereas Eastern, Western and South-Western municipalities mainly provided services themselves. Methods: A mail survey of a random sample of the 15—64-age population was conducted in 2002 (n = 2,000, response rate 62%). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics as well as bi- and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Of the respondents, 69% had visited an HC doctor during the past year, and of these, more than 40% had also visited another doctor outside the HC. The willingness to choose an HC doctor varied from 40% to 54% and was highest in the Southern municipality. When significantly associated variables — age, working status, perceived stress in life situation, access to an appointment, perceived interpersonal quality, and visits to doctors — were controlled for, the willingness to choose an HC doctor was, compared with the Southern municipality, less popular only in the Western municipality. Conclusions: The tendency to choose an HC doctor rather than an alternative was quite low, probably reflecting lack of attractiveness of HC to patients. However, contracting out service production did not additionally decrease patients’ willingness to choose an HC doctor. More attention should be paid to improving access, interpersonal quality and continuity of care.

Keywords

Choice of health centre physician non-profit organization physician visits public organizations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Primary Health Care Act 688/92; 1972.

Teperi J. , Porter ME , Vuorenkoski L. , Baron JF The Finnish health care system: a value-based perspective. Sitra Reports. Helsinki: Edita ; 2009.

Haque MS Revisiting the new public management. PAR 2007;Jan/Feb:179-82.

Kangas M. , Vänskä M. Terveyskeskuspäivystys keskittyy a vähenee. [Emergency services at health centres are centralizing and decreasing (in Finnish)]. Finnish Medical Journal 2006;23:2507-10.

Roos NP , Mustaard CA

Variation in health and health care use by socio-economic status in Winnipeg, Canada: does the system work well?

Yes or no. Millbank Q 1997;75(1):89-111.

Van der Heyden JH , Demarest S. , Tafforeau J. , Van Oyen H. Socio-economic differences in the utilisation of the health services in Belgium. Health Policy 2002;65:153-65.

Suominen S. , Ahvenainen J. , Mattila K. , Rautava P. , Koskenvuo M.

Koherenssintunne ja perusterveydenhuollon lääkäripalvelujen käyttö. [Sense of coherence and visits to doctors in the publicly and privately funded primary health care. (in Finnish with English abstract)]

J Soc Med 2002;4(39):296-303.

Suominen-Taipale A-L. , Koskinen S. , Martelin T. , Holmen J. , Johnsen R. Differences in older adults’ use of primary and specialist care services in two Nordic countries. Eur J Public Health 2004;14(4):375-80.

Aromaa A. , Linnala A. , Maljanen T. , Mattila K.

Yksityislääkärit omalääkäreinä. Raportti Kansaneläkelaitoksen omalääkärikokeilusta. [Private practitioners as family doctors. A report from the Social Insurance Institution’s family doctor project.]

Gummerus: Social Insurance Institution; 1998.

10.

Pileggi C. , Carbone V. , Pavia M. , Angelillo I.F. Patients’ perceptions and related behaviours on role of primary care physician in Italy. Eur J Public Health 2004;14(3):258-60.

11.

Laamanen R. , vretveit J. , Sundell J. , Simonsen-Rehn N. , Suominen S. , Brommels M. Client perceptions of the performance of public and independent not-for-profit primary health care. Scand J Public Health 2006;34:598-608.

12.

Kavanagh S. Purchasers, providers and managed care: developments in the mental health market place. Curr Opin Psychiatr 1997;10(2):153-9.

13.

Tuomola U. , Idänpää-Heikkilä U. , Lehtonen O-P. , Puro M. Arviointiselvitys vuosina 2002-2007 toteutetusta kansallisesta terveyshankkeesta. [Assessment report on the national health care project carried out in 2002-2007. Implementation of the Government Resolution on securing the future of health care.]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2008.

14.

Kuusela M. , Vainiomäki P. , Hinkka S. , Rautava P. The quality of GP consultation in two different salary systems. A Finnish experience. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004;22:168-73.

15.

Perneger TV , Etter JF , Raetzo MA , Schaller P. , Stadler H. Comparing of patient satisfaction with ambulatory visits in competing health care delivery settings in Geneva, Switzerland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50(4):463-8.

16.

Mills A. , Palmer N. , Gilson L. , McIntyre D. , Schneider H. , Sinanovic E. , Wadee H. The performance of different models of primary care provision in South Africa . Soc Sci Med 2004;59:931-43.

17.

Chlabicz S. , Marcinovawicz L. Public or non-public family medicine - patients perspective of the quality of primary care in Bialystok, Poland. Eur J Gen Practice 2005;11(1):5-10.

18.

Helakorpi S. , Patja K. , Prättälä R. , Aro AR , Uutel A. Suomalaisen aikuisväestön terveyskäyttäytyminen ja terveys, kevät 2002. [Health behavior and health among Finnish adult population, Spring 2002 (in Finnish with English abstract)]. Helsinki : Publications of the National Public Health Institute ; B 12/2002;2002.

19.

SPSS Statistics 17.0.

20.

Kauppinen S. , Niskanen T. Yksityinen palvelutuotanto sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. [Private service provision in social and health care (in Finnish with English abstract)]. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Reports 274. Gummerus ; 2003.

21.

Linnala A. , Aromaa A. , Mattila K. Improved availability of specialist consultations in primary health care: impact on physician visits. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003;21:83-7.

22.

Laamanen R. , Suominen S. , Hakonen U-R. , Simonsen-Rehn N. , Gripenberg-Gahmberg M. Perusterveydenhuollon ominaispiirteiden toteutuminen eri tyyppisissä palvelutuotanto-organisaatioissa. [Realization of primary health care attributes in different type of service provision organizations (in Finnish with English abstract)]. Finnish Local Government Studies 2001;4:288-307.

23.

Kalda R. , Polluste K. , Lember M. Patient satisfaction with care is associated with personal choice of physician . Health Policy 2003;64:55-62.

24.

Schmittdiel J. , Selby JV , Grumbach K. , Quesenberry CP Choice of a physician and patient satisfaction in a Health Maintenance Organization. JAMA 1997;278(19):1596-9.