High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: A birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of hospital episiotomy policy on obstetric and anal sphincter rupture (OASR, n = 2448) rates and risks among singleton vaginal deliveries in Finland between 1997 and 2007. Methods: An observational, retrospective, population-based register study. All 424,297 women in hospitals with more than 1000 deliveries annually, were divided into three groups based on the episiotomy rate quartiles for 11 years and separated on the basis of whether the women were primiparous or multiparous. The lowest and the highest quartiles were compared against the hospitals with intermediate episiotomy rates, comprising the two quartiles around the median. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to adjust significant risk factors. Results: The annual range of episiotomy varied from 11 to 94% in primiparous women, and from 1 to 46% in multiparous women. After adjustment the risk of OASR appears to be 39% lower (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52—0.90) in primiparous and 45% lower (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42—0.72) in multiparous women delivered in the highest quartile hospitals. At an individual level, episiotomy was a protective factor (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75—0.91) in primiparous women, but increased the risk by 2.36-fold in multiparous women (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.86—2.84). Conclusions: The results suggest that high episiotomy rate provided protection from OASR among both groups of women. Among the multiparous women, the 2.4-fold risk of OASR related to episiotomy at an individual level might be explained by confounding by indication, since episiotomy was performed more often to women at a high risk of OASR.

Keywords

Birth injuries delivery episiotomy/methods obstetrics perineum/injuries registries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carroli G. , Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:CD000081.

Raisanen SH , Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. , Gissler M. , Heinonen S. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88(12):1365-72.

Raisanen S. , Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. , Gissler M. , Heinonen S. The increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture - an emerging trend in Finland . Prev Med 2009;49(6):535-40.

Power D. , Fitzpatrick M. , O’Herlihy C. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: how to avoid, how to repair: a literature review. J Fam Pract 2006;55(3):193-200.

Gissler M. , Teperi J. , Hemminki E. , Merilainen J. Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry. Scand J Soc Med 1995;23(1):75-80.

Laine K. , Gissler M. , Pirhonen J. Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146(1):71-5.

Tjandra JJ , Chan MK , Kwok SY , Yeh CH , Tan JJ , Sloane K. , et al. Predictive factors for faecal incontinence after third or fourth degree obstetric tears: a clinicophysiologic study. Colorectal Dis 2008;10(7):681-8.

Molander P. , Vayrynen T. , Paavonen J. , Lepisto A. , Luukkonen P. Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86(12):1458-62.

Kairaluoma MV , Raivio P. , Aarnio MT , Kellokumpu IH Immediate repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture: medium-term outcome of the overlap technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(8):1358-63.

10.

Pinta TM , Kylanpaa ML , Salmi TK , Teramo KA , Luukkonen PS Primary sphincter repair: are the results of the operation good enough? Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(1):18-23.

11.

Pinta TM , Kylanpaa ML , Teramo KA , Luukkonen PS Sphincter rupture and anal incontinence after first vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83(10):917-22.

12.

Sultan AH , Kamm, Hudson CN , Bartram CI Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308(6933):887-91.

13.

Keskimäki I. , Aro S. Accuracy of data on diagnoses, procedures and accidents in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Int J Health Sci 1991;2:15-21.

14.

Williams A. , Lavender T. , Richmond DH , Tincello DG Women’s experiences after a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: a qualitative study. Birth 2005;32(2):129-36.

15.

Tan EK , Jacovides M. , Khullar V. , Teoh TG , Fernando RJ , Tekkis PP A cost-effectiveness analysis of delayed sphincteroplasty for anal sphincter injury. Colorectal Dis 2008;10(7):653-62.

16.

Mellgren A. , Jensen LL , Zetterstrom JP , Wong WD , Hofmeister JH , Lowry AC Long-term cost of fecal incontinence secondary to obstetric injuries. Dis Colon Rectum 1999 ;42(7):857-65; discussion 865-7.

17.

Revicky V. , Nirmal D. , Mukhopadhyay S. , Morris EP , Nieto JJ

Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;150(2):142-6.

18.

Aukee P. , Sundstrom H. , Kairaluoma MV The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85(7):856-60.

19.

Dahl C. , Kjolhede P. Obstetric anal sphincter rupture in older primiparous women: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85(10):1252-8.

20.

de Leeuw JW , Struijk PC , Vierhout ME , Wallenburg HC Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 2001;108(4):383-7.

21.

Poen AC , Felt-Bersma R. , Dekker GA , Devillé W. , Cuesta MA , Meuwissen SG Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104(5):563-6.