Socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilization,with and without adjustment for need: An example from Stockholm,Sweden

Abstract

Aim: Previous studies have shown varying degrees of inequity of utilization of healthcare in Sweden. Studies based solely on register data cannot take into account differences in health status while studies based solely on self-reported data from surveys may potentially have biased data on healthcare utilization. The aim of this study was to investigate socioeconomic differences in utilization of outpatient healthcare services in Stockholm County, comparing analysis based on only register data, with analysis based on health survey data linked to register data. Methods: We linked data from a public health survey in Stockholm County 2006 (n = 34,707) to register data on sociodemographic background characteristics and outpatient healthcare utilization in 2007. Negative binomial regression analysis was used to estimate income differentials in healthcare utilization adjusting for self-rated health and limiting longstanding illness. Results: Income differentials in the number of visits to doctors were found in favour of lower-income groups among people aged 25–64 years when only controlling for age. When controlling for health status, income differentials in favour of higher-income groups were observed among men (all ages) and among women aged 65+ years, with higher-income groups having 11–49% more visits than the lowest income group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that health status should be taken into account when analysing socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilization. When using only register based data there is a risk of underestimating or disregarding differences.

Keywords

Differentials healthcare need socioeconomic utilization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burström

. Market-oriented, demand-driven health care reforms and equity in health and health care utilization in Sweden. Int J Health Serv 2009;39:271–85.

Hälso- och sjukvårdslagen [Swedish Health Care Act]. In: SFS (ed.) 1982:736. Stockholm: Nordsteds, 1982.

Morris

Sutton

Gravelle

. Inequity and inequality in the use of health care in England: an empirical investigation. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1251–66.

Van der Heyden

Demarest

Tafforeau

. Socio-economic differences in the utilisation of health services in Belgium. Health Policy 2003;65:153–65.

van Doorslaer

Masseria

Koolman

. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ 2006;174:177–83.

van Doorslaer

Wagstaff

van der Burg

. Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US. J Health Econ 2000;19:553–83.

Moorin

Holman

. The effects of socioeconomic status, accessibility to services and patient type on hospital use in Western Australia: a retrospective cohort study of patients with homogenous health status. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:74.

Westin

Åhs

Bränd Persson

. A large proportion of Swedish citizens refrain from seeking medical care–lack of confidence in the medical services a plausible explanation? Health Policy 2004;68:333–44.

Elofsson

Unden

Krakau

. Patient charges–a hindrance to financially and psychosocially disadvantage groups seeking care. Soc Sci Med 1998;46: 1375–80.

10.

Westin

Westerling

. Health and healthcare utilization among single mothers and single fathers in Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2006;34:182–9.

11.

Burström

. Increasing inequalities in health care utilisation across income groups in Sweden during the 1990s? Health Policy 2002;62:117–29.

12.

Gerdtham

Sundberg

. Equity in the delivery of health care in Sweden. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:259–64.

13.

Eaker

Halmin

Bellocco

. Social differences in breast cancer survival in relation to patient management within a National Health Care System (Sweden). Int J Cancer 2009;124:180–7.

14.

Culyer

Wagstaff

. Equity and equality in health and health care. J Health Econ 1993;12:431–57.

15.

Gulliford

. Equity and access to health care. In: Gulliford

Morgan

(ed), Access to Health Care. London: Routledge, 2003.

16.

Allebeck

. The use of population based registers in psychiatric research. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009;120:386–91.

17.

Beckman

Merlo

Lynch

. Country of birth, socioeconomic position, and healthcare expenditure: a multilevel analysis of Malmo, Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:145–9.

18.

Walander

Ålander

Burström

. Sociala skillnader i vårdutnyttjande – Yrkesverksamma åldrar. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms läns landsting, 2004.

19.

Kristenson

Lundberg

Garvin

. Socioeconomic differences in outpatient healthcare utilisation are mainly seen for musculoskeletal problems in groups with poor self-rated health. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:805–12.

20.

Gerdtham

. Equity in health care utilization: further tests based on hurdle models and Swedish micro data. Health Econ 1997;6:303–19.

21.

Lundberg

. Sjukvård och vårdutnyttjande. Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.

22.

Miilunpalo

Vuori

Oja

. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:517–28.

23.

Wallman

Burell

Kullman

Svärdsudd

. Health care utilisation before and after retirement due to illness – A 13-year population-based follow-up study of prematurely retired men and referents from the general population. Scand J Prim Health 2004;22:95–100.

24.

Beckman

Håkansson

Råstam

. The role country of birth plays in receiving disability pensions in relation to patterns of health care utilisation and socioeconomic differences: a multilevel analysis of Malmö, Sweden. BMC Public Health 2006;6:71.

25.

Hanratty

Burström

Walander

. Inequality in the face of death? Public expenditure on health care for different socioeconomic groups in the last year of life. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007;12:90–4.

26.

Hilbe

. Negative binomial regression. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

27.

O’Donnell

Propper

. Equity and the distribution of UK National Health Service resources. J Health Econ 1991;10:1–19.

28.

O’Donnell

Propper

. Equity and the distribution of UK National Health-Service resources – reply. J Health Econ 1991;10:247–9.

29.

Sutton

Carr-Hill

Gravelle

. Do measures of self-reported morbidity bias the estimation of the determinants of health care utilisation? Soc Sci & Med 1999;49:867–78.

30.

Galobardes

Shaw

Lawlor

. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:7–12.