The role of young users in determining long-term care expenditure in Norway

Abstract

Aims: In Norway, it is the responsibility of the country’s 429 municipalities to provide long term care (LTC) services to their residents. Recent years have seen a sharp rise in the number of LTC users under the age of 65. This article aims to explore the effect of this rise on LTC expenditure. Methods: Panel data models are used on data from municipalities from 1986 to 2011. An instrumental variable approach is also utilized to account for possible endogeneity related to the number of young users. Results: The number of young users appears to have a strong effect on LTC expenditure. There is also evidence of municipalities exercising discretion in defining eligibility criteria for young users in order to limit expenditure. Conclusions: The rise in the number of young LTC users presents a long-term challenge to the sustainability of LTC financing. The current budgeting system appears to compensate municipalities for expenditure on young LTC users.

Keywords

Ageing long-term care young users LTC financing red herring hypothesis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Karlsson

Iversen

Øien

. Scandinavian long-term care financing. Health Economics Research Programme at the University of Oslo (HERO), 2010: 2.

Kjelvik

. Mindre del av utgiftene går til eldre. Samfunnspeilet. 2011;2: 23–29. Statistics Norway, 2011.

OECD. Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. OECD, 2011.

Weaver

Stearns

Norton

. Proximity to death and participation in the long-term care market. Health Econ 2009;18:867–83.

Zweifel

Felder

Meiers

. Ageing of population and health care expenditure: a red herring? Health Econ 1999;8:485–96.

Zweifel

Felder

Werblow

. Population ageing and health care expenditure: new evidence on the “red herring”. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 2004;29:652–66.

Häcker

Hackmann

. Los(t) in long-term care: Empirical evidence from German data 2000–2009. Health Econ 2010; 21(12): 1427–1443.

Werblow

Felder

Zweifel

. Population ageing and health care expenditure: a school of ‘red herrings’? Health Econ 2007;16:1109–26.

Yang

Norton

Stearns

. Longevity and health care expenditures the real reasons older people spend more. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2003;58:S2–S10.

10.

Hakkinen

Martikainen

Noro

. Aging, health expenditure, proximity to death, and income in Finland. Health Econ Pol Law 2008;3:165–95.

11.

Martikainen

Murphy

Metsä-Simola

. Seven-year hospital and nursing home care use according to age and proximity to death: variations by cause of death and socio-demographic position. J Epidemiol Community 2012; 66(12): 1152–1158.

12.

Spillman

Lubitz

. The effect of longevity on spending for acute and long-term care. New Engl J Med 2000;342:1409–15.

13.

Romøren

. Ulike “omsogsregimer” for eldre og yngre brukere? En kvantitativ analyse. Senter for omsorgsforskning, Østlandet, Gjøvik University College, Report Number 4, 2012.

14.

Brevik

. Kjennetegn ved yngre brukere av heimebaserte tjenester. Oslo: NIBR, 2012.

15.

Rattsø

. Local tax financing in the Nordic countries. In: Påhlsson

(ed.), Yearbook for Nordic tax research 2005. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2005, 33–50.

16.

Hagen

Kebebew

Godager

. Utviklingen i kommunenes helse- og omsorgstjenester 1986–2011. Health Economics Research Programme, University of Oslo (HERO), Skriftserie 2011: 5.

17.

Inman

. The fiscal performance of local governments: an interpretive review. In: Mieszkowski

Mahon

(eds.), Current issues in urban economics. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1979, 270–321.

18.

Rattsø

. Local government allocation of labour and the grant system: an applied model analysis of local government behaviour in Norway. Environ Plann C Govern Pol 1989;7:273–84.

19.

Rubinfeld

. The economics of the local public sector. In: Auerbach

Alan

Feldstein

Martin

(eds.), Handbook of public economics, Vol. II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987, 571–645.

20.

Falch

Rattsø

. Local public choice of school spending: disaggregating the demand function for educational services. Econ Educ Rev 1999;18:361–73.

21.

Heinesen

. Determinants of local public school expenditure: a dynamic panel data model. Reg Sci Urban Econ 2004;34:429–53.