Aims: Public surveys in socialized health systems indicate strong support for the role of government in health care, although different views can be detected. The study considers the public’s views on public versus private funding and delivery of health services. Methods: The study is based on a representative national sample of 1532 Icelandic adults, aged 18 and older, who participated in a national public issues survey. Respondents were asked about government spending on health care and whether the government or private parties should deliver health services. Results: The great majority of respondents thought that the government should spend more on health care, and should be the primary provider of care. Lower age, female gender, countryside residence, and expected high use of health care were related to greater support for governmental funding. Furthermore, countryside residence, less education, lower income, not being a governmental health worker, expected high health care use, and left-wing political ideology were all related to greater support for governmental delivery of health care. Conclusions: Despite sociodemographic variations, the study finds strong overall support for the role of government in funding and delivering health care. Previous perspectives and hypotheses of welfare state endorsement received mixed support, suggesting that further theoretical and empirical work is needed to better account for public views on the role of government in health care.
CockerhamWC. Medical sociology. 12th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2012.
2.
BlekesauneMQuadagnoJ. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. Eur Sociol Rev2003;19:415–27.
3.
EdlundJ. Trust in the capability of the welfare state and general welfare state support: Sweden 1997–2002. Acta Sociol2006;49:395–417.
4.
JægerMM. What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: Self-interest or political ideology?Acta Sociol2006;49:321–38.
5.
SvallforsS. The end of class politics? Structural cleavages and attitudes to Swedish welfare policies. Acta Sociol1995;38:53–74.
6.
SvallforsS. A bedrock of support? Trends in welfare state attitudes in Sweden, 1981–2010. Soc Policy Admin2011;45:806–825.
7.
KorpiWPalmeJ. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. Am Pol Sci Rev2003;97:425–446.
8.
PiersonP. Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. In: PiersonP (ed.) The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.410–456.
9.
HayesBCVandenHeuvelA. Government spending on health care: A cross-national study of public attitudes. J Health Soc Policy1996;7:61–79.
10.
PettersenPA. Welfare state legitimacy: Ranking, rating, paying. Scand Polit Stud2001;24:27–49.
11.
AndreßH-JHeienT. Explaining public attitudes towards the German welfare state using Structural Equation Models. Bielefeld, Germany: Fakultät für Soziologie, Universität Bielefeld, 1999.
12.
SvallforsS. Class, attitudes and the welfare state: Sweden in comparative perspective. Soc Policy Admin2004;38:119–138.
KikusawaSOlafsdottirSPescosolidoB. Similar pressures, different contexts: Public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations. J Health Soc Behav2008;49:385–99.
16.
VilhjalmssonR. Íslenska heilbrigðiskerfið á krossgötum. [The Icelandic health system at the crossroads]. In: JóhannessonGÞ (ed.) Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum VIII [Research in the Social Sciences VIII]. Reykjavik, Iceland: Social Science Institute, 2007, pp.197–206.
17.
VilhjalmssonR. Failure to seek needed medical care: Results from a national health survey of Icelanders. Soc Sci Med2005;61:1320–30.
18.
VilhjalmssonR. Viðhorf Íslendinga til reksturs og fjármögnunar heilbrigðisþjónustunnar. [Views of Icelanders toward funding and delivery of health services]. Reykjavik, Iceland: Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, 2013.
19.
BenderRGrouvenU. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. J R Coll Physicians Lond1997;31:546–51.
20.
ElolaJDaponteANavarroV. Health indicators and the organization of health care systems in Western Europe. Am J Public Health1995;85:1397–1401.
21.
ChungHMuntanerC. Welfare state matters: A typological multilevel analysis of wealthy countries. Health Policy2007;80:328–39.
22.
NeumannE. Increasing conflict in times of retrenchment? Attitudes towards healthcare provision in Europe between 1996 and 2002. Int J Soc Welfare2014;23: 276–86.
23.
DahlgrenG. Why public health services? Experiences from profit-driven health care reforms in Sweden. Int J Health Serv2014;44:507–24.
LaugesenM. Why some market reforms lack legitimacy in health care. J Health Polit Policy Law2005;30:1065–1100.
26.
Velferðarráðuneytið og Hagstofa Íslands [Ministry of Welfare and Statistics Iceland]. Félagsvísar [Social indicators]. Reykjavik, Iceland: Velferðarráðuneytið og Hagstofa Íslands, 2014.
27.
Velferðarráðuneytið [Ministry of Welfare]. Betri heilbrigðisþjónusta 2013–2017. [Better health services 2013–2017]. Reykjavik, Iceland: Velferðarráðuneytið, 2014.
