Changes over time in the risk of hospitalization for physical diseases among homeless men and women in Stockholm: A comparison of two cohorts

Abstract

Aims: To follow-up hospitalization for physical diseases among homeless men and women compared with a control group from the general population. The study also investigated the changes in the difference between the homeless men and women and the general population over time by comparing two cohorts of homeless people (2000–2002 and 1996). Methods: A total of 3887 people (24% women) who were homeless during the period 2000–2002 were compared with 11,661 people from the general population with respect to hospitalization for physical diseases and injuries (2000–2010). Indirect comparisons were used to compare the relative risk (RR) of hospitalization between the cohort of people who were homeless in 2000–2002 with a cohort of those who were homeless in 1996. Results: Homeless people have an RR of being hospitalized for physical diseases twice that of the general population. The largest differences were found in skin diseases, infections, injury/poisoning and diseases of the respiratory system. Indirect comparison between people who were homeless in 2000–2002 and 1996 showed an increasing difference between young (18–35 years) homeless men and men in the control group (RR 1.32). The difference had also increased between homeless men and men in the control group for hospitalization for heart disease (RR 1.35), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR 2.60) and poisoning (RR 1.89). Among women, the difference had decreased between homeless women and women in the control group for skin disease (RR 0.20) and injury/poisoning (RR 0.60). There was no significant difference between the sexes in the two homeless cohorts. Conclusions: There was no improvement in excess hospitalization among homeless people over time. The difference between young homeless men and young men in the general population increased between 1996 and 2000–2002.

Keywords

Homeless people sex differences physical health hospital care follow-up

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Badiaga

Richet

Azas

. Contribution of a shelter-based survey for screening respiratory diseases in the homeless. Eur J Public Health 2009;19:157–60.

Beijer

Wolf

Fazel

. Prevalence of tuberculosis, hepatitis C virus, and HIV in homeless people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2012;12:859–70.

Doran

Vashi

Platis

. Navigating the boundaries of emergency department care: addressing the medical and social needs of patients who are homeless. Am J Public Health 2013;103:S355–60.

Fazel

Geddes

Kushel

. The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations. Lancet 2014;384:1529–40.

Hwan

Colantonio

Chiu

. The effect of traumatic brain injury on the health of homeless people. CMAJ 2008;179:779–84.

Keogh

O’Brien

Hoban

. Health and use of health services of people who are homeless and at risk of homelessness who receive free primary health care in Dublin. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15;58.

Lee

Hanlon

Ben-David

. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in homeless adults. Circulation 2005;111:2629–35.

Nyamathi

Dixon

Robbins

. Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among homeless adults. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:134–43.

Schanzer

Dominquez

Shrout

. Homelessness, health status, and health care use. Am J Public Health 2007;97:464–9.

10.

O’Brien

Palepu

. Healthcare utilization, legal incidents, and victimization following traumatic brain injury in homeless and vulnerably housed individuals: a prospective cohort study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014;30:227–76.

11.

Beijer

Andréasson

. Physical diseases among homeless people: gender differences and comparisons with the general populations. Scand J Public Health 2009;37:93–100.

12.

Finne

. Statistik över kontakter med missbrukare, hemlösa och psykiskt störda i Stockholm år 2001 [Statistics on addicts, homeless, and mentally ill persons in Stockholm 2001] [in Swedish]. Research and Development Report, 2003. Stockholm: Social Welfare Administration of Stockholm.

13.

Bucher

Guyatt

Griffith

. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. JCE 1997;50:683–91.

14.

Song

. What is indirect comparison? Statistics, www.whatisseries.co.uk/what-is-indirect-comparison/ (2009, accessed May 2016).

15.

European Network for Health Technology Assessment. Guideline Comparators & Comparisons: Direct and Indirect Comparisons. Final Version. February 2013.