Time trends in absolute and relative socioeconomic inequalities in leisure time physical inactivity in northern Sweden

Abstract

Aims: The aim was to investigate the time trends in educational, occupational, and income-related inequalities in leisure time physical inactivity in 2006, 2010, and 2014 in northern Swedish women and men. Methods: This study was based on data obtained from the repeated cross-sectional Health on Equal Terms survey of 2006, 2010, and 2014. The analytical sample consisted of 20,667 (2006), 31,787 (2010), and 21,613 (2014) individuals, aged 16–84. Logistic regressions were used to model the probability of physical inactivity given a set of explanatory variables. Slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) were used as summary measures of the social gradient in physical inactivity. The linear trend in inequalities and difference between gender and years were estimated by interaction analyses. Results: The year 2010 displayed the highest physical inactivity inequalities for all socioeconomic position indicators, but educational and occupational inequalities decreased in 2014. However, significant positive linear trends were found in absolute and relative income inequalities. Moreover, women had significantly higher RII of education in physical inactivity in 2014 and significantly higher SII and RII of income in physical inactivity in 2010, than did men in the same years. Conclusions: The recent reduction in educational and occupational inequalities following the high inequalities around the time of the great recession in 2010 suggests that the current policies might be fairly effective. However, to eventually alleviate inequities in physical inactivity, the focus of the researchers and policymakers should be directed toward the widening trends of income inequalities in physical inactivity.

Keywords

Physical inactivity socioeconomic inequality slope index of inequality relative index of inequality time trend

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kohl

Craig

Lambert

et al

The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet 2012;380:294–305.

Sallis

Bull

Guthold

et al

Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet 2016;388:1325–36.

Solar

Irwin

A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization, 2007.

European Commission. Why socio-economic inequalities increase? Facts and policy responses in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2010.

Hassler

Sweden in past, current and future economic crises. Report for the OECD Economic Department, 2010.

Galobardes

Lynch

Smith

GD.

Measuring socioeconomic position in health research. Br Med Bull 2007;81–82:21–37.

Geyer

Hemström

Peter

et al

Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:804–10.

Krieger

Williams

Moss

NE.

Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 1997;18:341–78.

Beenackers

Kamphuis

CBM

Giskes

et al

Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:116.

10.

Bennett

Winters-Stone

Nail

et al

Definitions of sedentary in physical-activity-intervention trials: a summary of the literature. J Aging Phys Act 2006;14:456–77.

11.

McAuley

Rudolph

Physical activity, aging, and psychological well-being. J Aging Phys Act 1995;3:67–96.

12.

Wemme

Rosvall

Work related and non-work related stress in relation to low leisure time physical activity in a Swedish population. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:377–9.

13.

Bergman

Grjibovski

Hagströmer

et al

Adherence to physical activity recommendations and the influence of socio-demographic correlates: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2008;8:367.

14.

Barnes

Behrens

Benden

et al

Letter to the Editor: standardized use of the terms ‘sedentary’ and ‘sedentary behaviours’. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012;37:540–2.

15.

Boström

Nyqvist

Objective and background of the questions in the national public health survey. Swedish National Institute of Public Health, 2010.

16.

Statistics Sweden. Swedish socio-economic classification. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 1984.

17.

Erikson

Goldthorpe

Portocarero

Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. Br J Sociol 1979;30:415–41.

18.

Lundström

Särndal

C-E.

Estimation in the presence of nonresponse and frame imperfections. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 2001.

19.

Spinakis

Anastasiou

Panousis

et al

Expert review and proposals for measurement of health inequalities in the European Union – full report. Luxembourg: European Commission Directorate General for Health and Consumers, 2011.

20.

Moreno-Betancur

Latouche

Menvielle

et al

Relative index of inequality and slope index of inequality. Epidemiology 2015;26:518–27.

21.

Barros

AJD

Hirakata

. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:21.

22.

Khang

Y-H

Yun

S-C

Lynch

JW.

Monitoring trends in socioeconomic health inequalities: it matters how you measure. BMC Public Health 2008;8:66.

23.

Ernstsen

Strand

Nilsen

et al

Trends in absolute and relative educational inequalities in four modifiable ischaemic heart disease risk factors: repeated cross-sectional surveys from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) 1984–2008. BMC Public Health 2012;12:266.

24.

Liu

Local labor market fluctuations and physical activity among adults in the United States, 1990–2009. ISRN Public Health 2012;2012:1–7.

25.

Nyampame

Tackling health inequalities in Sweden: an overview. Swedish National Institute of Public Health, 2012.

26.

OECD. Divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011.

27.

Demarest

Van Oyen

Roskam

et al

Educational inequalities in leisure-time physical activity in 15 European countries. Eur J Public Health 2014;24:199–204.

28.

Townsend

Davidson

Black

et al

Inequalities in health: the Black report. London: Penguin, 1988.

29.

Stait

Calnan

Are differential consumption patterns in health-related behaviours an explanation for persistent and widening social inequalities in health in England?

Int J Equity Health 2016;15:171.

30.

Ding

Schmidt

et al

A widening gap? Changes in multiple lifestyle risk behaviours by socioeconomic status in New South Wales, Australia. PLoS One 2015;2012:2–13.

31.

Shiely

MacDonncha

Meeting the international adolescent physical activity guidelines: a comparison of objectively measured and self-reported physical activity levels. Irish Med J 2009;102:15–19.

32.

Paulik

Bóka

Kertész

et al

Determinants of health-promoting lifestyle behaviour in the rural areas of Hungary. Health Promot Int 2010;25:277–88.

33.

Stephens

Jacobs

White

CC.

A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity. Public Health Rep 1985;100:147–58.