Time to dismiss the idea of a structural fix within government? An analysis of intersectoral action for health in Danish municipalities

Abstract

Aims: This paper examines the role of organizational structure within government(s) in attempts to implement intersectoral action for health in Danish municipalities. We discuss the implications of structural reorganization and the governance structures that are established in order to ensure coordination and integration between policy sectors. Methods: The paper is based on 49 interviews with civil servants from health and non-health sectors of 10 municipalities. Based on participants’ experiences, cases have been described and analyzed in an iterative process consulting the literature on Health in All Policies and joined-up government. Results: Continuous and frequent processes of reorganizing were widespread in the municipalities. However, they appeared to have little effect on policy change. The two most common governance structures established to transcend organizational boundaries were the central unit and the intersectoral committee. According to the experiences of participants, paradoxically both of these organizational solutions tend to reproduce the organizational problems they are intended to overcome. Even if structural reorganization may succeed in dissolving some sector boundaries, it will inevitably create new ones. Conclusions: It is time to dismiss the idea that intersectoral action for health can be achieved by means of a structural fix. Rather than rearranging organizational boundaries it may be more useful to seek to manage the silos which exist in any organization, e.g. by promoting awareness of their implications for public health action and by enhancing the boundary spanning skills of public health officers.

Keywords

Intersectoral action for health Health in All Policies intersectoral governance joined-up government organization structure boundary spanning local government municipalities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

McQueen

Wismar

Lin

et al . Intersectoral governance for Health in All Policies. Structures, actions and experiences. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2012.

Ollila

Baum

Peña

. Introduction to Health in All Policies and the analytical framework of the book. In: Leppo

Ollila

Peña

et al . (eds) Health in All Policies: seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland, 2013, pp.3–23.

World Health Organization. The Helsinki Statement on Health in All Policies. In: The 8th global conference on health promotion, Helsinki, Finland, 10–14 June 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Carey

Crammond

Keast

. Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: how can efforts be improved? BMC Public Health 2014;14:1087.

Ndumbe-Eyoh

Moffatt

. Intersectoral action for health equity: a rapid systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1056.

Holt

Frohlich

Tjørnhøj-Thomsen

et al . Intersectoriality in Danish municipalities: corrupting the social determinants of health? Health Promot Int 2016;32:881-90.

Shankardass

Solar

Murphy

et al . A scoping review of intersectoral action for health equity involving governments. Int J Public Health 2012;57:25–33.

Breton

. A sophisticated architecture is indeed necessary for the implementation of Health in All Policies but not enough. Comment on “Understanding the role of public administration in implementing action on the social determinants of health and health inequities”. Int J Health Policy Manage 2016;5:383–5.

Tett

. The silo effect. Why every organisation needs to disrupt itself to survive. London: Abacus, 2015.

10.

Carey

Crammond

. Action on the social determinants of health: views from inside the policy process. Soc Sci Med 2015;128:134–41.

11.

Weber

Fivelsdal

. Makt og byråkrati: essays om politikk og klasse, samfunnsforskning og verdier. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, 1971.

12.

Mintzberg

. Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983.

13.

Bardach

. Getting agencies to work together: the practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998.

14.

Bryson

Crosby

Stone

. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev 2006;66:44–55.

15.

Pons-Vigues

Diez

Morrison

et al . Social and health policies or interventions to tackle health inequalities in European cities: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2014;14:198.

16.

Van Vliet-Brown

Shahram

Oelke

. Health in All Policies utilization by municipal governments: scoping review. Health Promot Int. Epub ahead of print 14 March 2017. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dax008.

17.

De Leeuw

Clavier

. Healthy public in all policies. Health Promot Int 2011;26:ii237-44.

18.

World Health Organization. The Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1986.

19.

Weiss

Lillefjell

Magnus

. Facilitators for the development and implementation of health promoting policy and programs: a scoping review at the local community level. BMC Public Health 2016;16:140.

20.

De Leeuw

Kickbusch

Palmer

et al . European Healthy Cities come to terms with health network governance. Health Promot Int 2015;30:i32-44.

21.

Bogason

. Forvaltning og stat. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2013.

22.

Diderichsen

Scheele

Little

. Tackling health inequalities locally: the Scandinavian experience. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, 2015.

23.

Retsinformation.dk. Bekendtgørelse af sundhedsloven, Kapitel 35, §119 stk. 1 og 2, www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=152710#Kap77 (accessed October 2018).

24.

Hanak

Falk

Størup

et al . Forebyggelse og sundhedsfremme i kommunen – en vejledning til Sundhedslovens §119 stk. 1 og 2. 2007. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen.

25.

Hansen

Jørgensen

. Organisering af forebyggelse og sundhedsfremme - Erfaringer fra kommunernes første år. Copenhagen: AKF, Anvendt Kommunal Forskning, 2008.

26.

Christiansen

Pedersen

Holt

et al . Kortlægning. Kommunernes arbejde med implementering af Sundhedsstyrelsens forebyggelsespakker. Midtvejsrapport. Copenhagen: Centre for Intervention Research, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 2014.

27.

Curtis

Bech

. Organisering og implementering af sundhed på tværs. Denmark: Sund By Netværket, 2012.

28.

Aarestrup

Due

Kamper-Jørgensen

. De kommunale sundhedspolitikker i Danmark - en kortlægning. Copenhagen: Statens Institut for Folkesundhed, Syddansk Universitet, 2007.

29.

Larsen

Rantala

Koudenburg

et al . Intersectoral action for health: the experience of a Danish municipality. Scand J Public Health 2014;42:649–57.

30.

Holt

. Intersectoral policymaking for health? From policy to practice: a qualitative study of challenging implementation. Copenhagen: University of Southern Denmark, 2016.

31.

Kvale

. InterView. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1997.

32.

Holstein

Gubrium

. Active interviewing. In: Gubrium

Holstein

(eds) Postmodern interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2003, pp.66–81.

33.

Holt

Rod

Waldorff

et al . Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:54.

34.

Mason

. Qualitative researching. London: Sage Publications, 2007.

35.

Tavory

Timmermans

. Abductive analysis: theorizing qualitative research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.

36.

Meyer

Rowan

. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 1977;83:340–63.

37.

Brunsson

. The organization of hypocrisy. Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. 2nd ed. Norway: Abstrakt forlag AS, 2002.

38.

O’Flynn

Buick

Blackman

et al . You win some, you lose some: experiments with joined-up government. Int J Public Adm 2011;34:244–54.

39.

O’Flynn

. From headline to hard grind: the importance of understanding public administration in achieving health outcomes. Int J Health Policy Manage 2016;5:439–42.

40.

Greer

Maresso

. Intersectoral problem solving by interdepartmental units and commitees. Eurohealth 2012;18:11–4.

41.

Carey

Crammond

. What works in joined-up government? An evidence synthesis. Int J Public Adm 2015;38:1020–9.

42.

Hyde

. How to make the rhetoric of joined-up government really work. Aust N Z Health Policy 2008;5:22.

43.

Keast

. Joined-up governance in Australia: how the past can inform the future. Int J Public Adm 2011;34:221–31.

44.

Blom-Hansen

Christiansen

Pallesen

et al . Offentlig forvaltning – et politologisk perspektiv. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2014.

45.

Wismar

McQueen

Lin

et al . Intersectoral governance for health in all policies. Eurohealth 2012;18:3–7.

46.

Williams

. We are all boundary spanners now? Int J Public Sector Manage 2013;26:17–32.

47.

Williams

. The competent boundary spanner. Public Adm 2002;80:103–24.

48.

Nielsen

Knudsen

Finke

. Expansive or limitative strategy? A case study of organisational responses to new public health. J Health Organiz Manage 2008;22:384–99.

49.

Ollila

. Health in all policies: from rhetoric to action. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:11–8.

50.

Keast

. Integration terms: same or different and does it really matter? In: Carey

(ed) Grassroots to government: creating joined-up working in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2016, pp.26–46.

51.

Cigler

. Multi-organizational, multisector and multi community organizations: setting the research agenda. In: Mandell

(ed) Getting results through collaboration: networks and network structures for public policy and management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2001, pp.71–85.