The role of social embeddedness for remaining in non-desired workplaces and mental health consequences: Results from Scania Public Health Cohort

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate the role of social embeddedness on and off the job in relation to remaining in non-desired workplaces (NDWs) and the development of mental health. Method: The study used questionnaire data from the Scania Public Health cohort (N=2410) that were collected in 2000 (T1), 2005 (T2) and 2010 (T3). Logistic regression models were calculated to probe how NDWs and social embeddedness factors measured at baseline (T1) related to NDWs five years later (T2), and to investigate how NDWs and social embeddedness factors at T2 related to poor mental health at T3. Synergy indices were calculated in both analyses to test for additive v. interactive effects between NDWs and social embeddedness factors on the outcomes. Results: NDWs at baseline and low social embeddedness on and off the job was associated with NDWs at T2. For those in a desired workplace, low support from co-workers as well as low workplace affinity increased the risk to be in an NDW at T2. NDWs and low social embeddedness also associated with impaired mental health (T3). For those in an NDW, low support from co-workers as well as low workplace affinity increased the risk of poor mental health at T3. Conclusions: This study underlines the importance of social embeddedness for NDWs and the development of poor mental health over time. Particularly low social support from co-workers and low workplace affinity seem to be risk factors for future experience of an NDW and impaired mental health.

Keywords

Workplace non-preference social embeddedness social relations off-the-job embeddedness mental health longitudinal study cohort design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronsson

Göransson

Permanent employment but not in a preferred occupation: psychological and medical aspects, research implications. J Occup Health Psychol 1999;4(2):152–63.

Canivet

Aronsson

Bernhard-Oettel

et al . The negative effects on mental health of being in a non-desired occupation in an increasingly precarious labour market. Soc Sci Med – Popul Health 2017;14(3):516–24.

Fahlen

Goine

Edlund

et al . Effort-reward imbalance, ‘locked in’ at work, and long-term sick leave. Inter Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82(2):191–7.

Bernhard-Oettel

Stengård

Leineweber

et al . Stuck at a workplace: What’s work control, demands and learning got to do with it? A longitudinal multilevel study on Swedish permanent employees in situations of ‘workplace locked-in’. Int J Hum Resour Man 2018; 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1423101.

Feldman

TWH

. Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success. J Manag 2007;33(3):350–77.

Stengård

Bernhard-Oettel

Berntson

et al . Stuck in a job: being ‘locked-inʼ or at risk of becoming locked-in at the workplace and well-being over time. Work Stress 2016:1–21.

Furåker

Inlåsning på den svenska arbetsmarknaden. Arbetsmarknad Arbetsliv 2010;16(4):55–70.

Karasek

Theorell

Healthy Work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books, 1990.

Johnson

Hall

Theorell

Combined effects of job strain and social isolation on cardiovascular disease and morbidity in a random sample of the Swedish male population. Scand J Work Environ & Health 1989;15:271–9.

10.

TWH

Feldman

. Organizational embeddedness and occupational embeddedness across career stages. J Vocat Behav 2007;70:336–51.

11.

Higgins

MC.

Changing careers: the effects of social context. J Organ Behav 2001;22(6):595–618.

12.

Feldman

TWH

Vogel

RM.

Off-the-job embeddedness: A reconceptualization and agenda for future research. Res Person Hum Resour Manag 2015;31:209–51.

13.

Mitchell

Holtom

Lee

et al . Why people stay: Using job embeddnedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad Manage J 2001;44:1102–21.

14.

Van der Doef

Maes

. The Job Demand-Control (-Support) Model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 1999;13(2):87–114.

15.

Aronsson

Dallner

Gustafsson

Yrkes- och Arbetsplatsinlåsning En empirisk studie av omfattning och hälsokonsekvenser. Arbete och Hälsa 2000;2000:5.

16.

Muhonen

Feeling double locked-in at work: Implications for health and job satisfaction among municipal employees. Work 2010;37(2):199–204.

17.

Carlsson

Merlo

Lindstrom

et al . Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden, with special reference to ethnic differences in participation. Scand J Public Health 2006;34(2):132–9.

18.

Swedish socioeconomic classification . Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 1982.

19.

Goldberg

Gater

Sartorius

et al . The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 1997;27(1):191–7.

20.

Goldberg

Oldehinkel

Ormel

Why GHQ threshold varies from one place to another. Psychol Med 1998;28(4):915–21.

21.

Karasek

Gordon

Pietrokovsky

et al . Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1985.

22.

Hanson

Ostergren

Elmstahl

et al . Reliability and validity assessments of measures of social networks, social support and control – results from the Malmo Shoulder and Neck Study. Scand J Soc Med 1997;25(4):249–57.

23.

Zou

A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159(7):702–6.

24.

Rothman

Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1986.