The Danish National Health Survey: Study design,response rate and respondent characteristics in 2010,2013 and 2017

Abstract

Aim: This article aims to describe the study design, including descriptive statistics on changes in response rates, characteristics associated with response and response mode distribution, in the Danish National Health Survey (DNHS) in 2010, 2013 and 2017. Methods: Each survey was based on five regional stratified random samples and one national random sample drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System. The subsamples were mutually exclusive. Around 300,000 individuals (aged ⩾16 years) were invited to participate in each survey using a mixed-mode approach (paper/web). A questionnaire with a minimum of 52 questions was used in all subsamples. In 2010 and 2013, invitations were sent via the regular postal service, whereas a secure electronical mail service was used to invite the majority (around 90%) in 2017. Weights accounted for survey design and non-response. Results: Participation decreased from 59.5% in 2010 to 54.0% in 2013 after which it increased to 58.7% in 2017. The proportion answering the web questionnaire increased from 31.0% to 77.4% between 2013 and 2017 and varied from 73.8% to 79.7% between the subsamples in 2017. Overall, the response rate was low among young men and old women and among individuals who were unmarried, had low sociodemographic status, were from ethnic minority backgrounds or were living in the eastern part of Denmark. Conclusions: The survey mode, response mode distribution as well as response rate have changed over time. Weights to handle non-response can be applied to accommodate possible problems in generalising the results. However, efforts should continuously be made to ensure that response is missing at random.

Keywords

Cross-sectional studies study design data collection health surveys health surveillance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aromaa

Koponen

Tafforeau

, et al. Evaluation of health interview surveys and health examination surveys in the European Union. Eur J Public Health 2003;13:67–72.

Tolonen

Helakorpi

Talala

, et al. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol 2006;21:409–15.

Galea

Tracy

Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17:643–53.

Mindell

Giampaoli

Goesswald

, et al. Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe – experience from seven national surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15.

Coughlin

SS.

Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:87–91.

Pedersen

CB.

The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:22–5.

Christensen

Ekholm

Glumer

, et al. The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics. Scand J Public Health 2012;40:391–7.

Zierau

Hardt

Henriksen

, et al. Validation of a self-administered modified CAGE test (CAGE-C) in a somatic hospital ward: comparison with biochemical markers. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005;65:615–22.

Eskildsen

Dalgaard

Nielsen

, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish consensus version of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015;41:486–90.

10.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385–96.

11.

Ware

Jr Kosinski

Keller

SD.

A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33.

12.

Gandek

Ware

Aaronson

, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1171–8.

13.

Jensen

Rasmussen

AW.

Danish education registers. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:91–4.

14.

Petersson

Baadsgaard

Thygesen

LC.

Danish registers on personal labour market affiliation. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:95–8.

15.

Fangel

Linde

Thorsted

Nye problemer med repræsentativitet i surveys, som opregning med registre kan reducere [New problems with survey representativity, which enumeration with registers is able to reduce]. Metode og Data 2007;93:14–21.

16.

Lundstrôm

Sârndal

Calibration as a standard method for treatment of nonresponse. J Official Stat 1999;15:22.

17.

Borodulin

Tolonen

Jousilahti

, et al. Cohort Profile: the National FINRISK Study. Int J Epidemiol 2018;47:696-i.

18.

Mindell

Giampaoli

Goesswald

, et al. Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe – experience from seven national surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15:78.

19.

Christensen

Ekholm

Kristensen

, et al. The effect of multiple reminders on response patterns in a Danish health survey. Eur J Public Health 2015;25:156–61.

20.

Edwards

Roberts

Clarke

, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;MR000008.

21.

Karvanen

Harkanen

Reinikainen

, et al. Recommendations for design and analysis of health examination surveys under selective non-participation. Eur J Public Health 2019;29:8–12.

22.

Porter

Whitcomb

ME.

Mixed-mode contacts in web surveys: paper is not necessarily better. Public Opin Q 2007;71:635–48.

23.

Christensen

Ekholm

Gray

, et al. What is wrong with non-respondents? Alcohol-, drug- and smoking-related mortality and morbidity in a 12-year follow-up study of respondents and non-respondents in the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey. Addiction 2015;110:1505–12.

24.

Keyes

Rutherford

Popham

, et al. How healthy are survey respondents compared with the general population? Using survey-linked death records to compare mortality outcomes. Epidemiology 2018;29:299–307.

25.

Hupkens

CLH

Van Den Berg

Van Der Zee

. National health interview surveys in Europe: an overview. Health Policy 1999;47:145–68.

26.

Tjonneland

Olsen

Boll

, et al. Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in diet, cancer and health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health 2007;35:432–41.

27.

Magriplis

Dimakopoulos

Karageorgou

, et al. Aims, design and preliminary findings of the Hellenic National Nutrition and Health Survey (HNNHS). BMC Med Res Methodol 2019;19:37.

28.

Hoebel

Von Der Lippe

Lange

, et al. Mode differences in a mixed-mode health interview survey among adults. Arch Public Health 2014;72:46.

29.

Tipping

Hope

Pickering

, et al. The effect of mode and context on survey results: Analysis of data from the Health Survey for England 2006 and the Boost Survey for London. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10.

30.

Christensen

Ekholm

Glumer

, et al. Effect of survey mode on response patterns: comparison of face-to-face and self-administered modes in health surveys. Eur J Public Health 2014;24:327–32.

31.

Mauz

Von Der Lippe

Allen

, et al. Mixing modes in a population-based interview survey: comparison of a sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public health research. Arch Public Health 2018;76:8.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB