The study aim was to describe the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among women with breast cancer and without breast cancer in Denmark. Furthermore, the aim was to investigate whether use was related to lifestyle factors, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Methods:
A cross-sectional design was applied, and data from 1452 women aged 63–82 years collected in 2010–2011 from the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort was used. Some 717 of the women had breast cancer and 735 were without breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression was applied with CAM use as the outcome variable and lifestyle factors, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and HRQoL as explanatory variables. Adjustments were made for potential confounders.
Results:
CAM was used by 34.3% (95% CI [30.1, 37.7]) of the women without breast cancer and 38.6% (95% CI [35.1, 42.2]) of the women with breast cancer. The most frequently used CAMs were massage, acupuncture/acupressure, relaxation techniques, reflexology, medicinal tea, herbs and plant extracts, and most CAM users used a single modality. CAM users were more likely to be younger, divorced, and less likely to smoke. Breast cancer status, body mass index, alcohol use, and comorbidity status were not significantly associated with CAM use. CAM users had lower means across all HRQoL dimensions compared to non-users.
Conclusions:
CAM use is common among Danish women, with no significant difference found when comparing women with and without breast cancer. CAM users seemingly had lower HRQoL, and were more likely to be younger, divorced, and less likely to smoke.
LarønningenSArvidssonGBrayF, et al. NORDCAN: cancer incidence, mortality, prevalence and survival in the nordic countries, Version 9.4. Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Cancer Registry of Norway, https://nordcan.iarc.fr/ (2024, accessed on 18 June 2025).
2.
LovelaceDLMcDanielLRGoldenD.Long-term effects of breast cancer surgery, treatment, and survivor care. J Midwifery Womens Health2019;64:713–24.
3.
Demark-WahnefriedWAzizNMRowlandJH, et al. Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol2005;23:5814–30.
4.
KemppainenLMKemppainenTTReippainenJA, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe: health-related and sociodemographic determinants. Scand J Public Health2018;46:448–55.
5.
World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.
JohnsonSBParkHSGrossCP, et al. Use of alternative medicine for cancer and its impact on survival. J Natl Cancer Inst2018;110. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx145.
8.
JohnGMHershmanDLFalciL, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use among US cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv2016;10:850–64.
9.
StockerAMehnert-TheuerkaufAHinzA, et al. Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by women with breast cancer or gynecological cancer. PLoS One2023;18:e0285718.
10.
FoxPButlerMCoughlanB, et al. Using a mixed methods research design to investigate complementary alternative medicine (CAM) use among women with breast cancer in Ireland. Eur J Oncol Nurs2013;17:490–7.
11.
LuoQAsherGN.Complementary and alternative medicine use at a comprehensive cancer center. Integr Cancer Ther2017;16:104–9.
12.
MickeOBrunsFGlatzelM, et al. Predictive factors for the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in radiation oncology. Eur J Integr Med2009;1:19–25.
13.
HanssenBGrimsgaardSLaunsøL, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in the Scandinavian countries. Scand J Prim Health Care2005;23:57–62.
14.
PedersenCGChristensenSJensenAB, et al. Prevalence, socio-demographic and clinical predictors of post-diagnostic utilisation of different types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a nationwide cohort of Danish women treated for primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer2009;45:3172–81.
KremserTEvansAMooreA, et al. Use of complementary therapies by Australian women with breast cancer. Breast2008;17:387–94.
17.
MolassiotisAFernandez-OrtegaPPudD, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol2005;16:655–63.
18.
DengCXieYLiuY, et al. Aromatherapy plus music therapy improve pain intensity and anxiety scores in patients with breast cancer during perioperative periods: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Breast Cancer2022;22:115–20.
19.
MoraDCOvervagGJongMC, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine modalities used to treat adverse effects of anti-cancer treatment among children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complement Med Ther2022;22:97.
20.
CheungDSTXuXSmithR, et al. Invasive or noninvasive? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of acupuncture and acupressure to treat sleep disturbance in cancer patients. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs2023;20:202–11.
21.
HeYGuoXMayBH, et alClinical evidence for association of acupuncture and acupressure with improved cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol2020;6:271–8.
22.
BostromBSandhMLundbergD, et al. A comparison of pain and health-related quality of life between two groups of cancer patients with differing average levels of pain. J Clin Nurs2003;12:726–35.
23.
FortnerBVStepanskiEJWangSC, et al. Sleep and quality of life in breast cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage2002;24:471–80.
24.
BallatoriERoilaFRuggeriB, et al. The impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. Support Care Cancer2007;15:179–85.
25.
FossaSDDahlAA.Short Form 36 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A comparison based on patients with testicular cancer. J Psychosom Res2002;52:79-87.
26.
BishopFLLewithGT.Who uses CAM? A narrative review of demographic characteristics and health factors associated with CAM use. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2010;7:11–28.
27.
JungAYCaiXThoeneK, et al. Antioxidant supplementation and breast cancer prognosis in postmenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Am J Clin Nutr2019;109:69–78.
28.
WolfCRachowTErnstT, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) supplements in cancer outpatients: analyses of usage and of interaction risks with cancer treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol2022;148:1123–35.
29.
TjonnelandAOlsenABollK, et al. Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in Diet, Cancer and Health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health2007;35:432–41.
30.
GjerstorffML.The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health2011;39:42–5.
31.
GoldrosenMHStrausSE.Complementary and alternative medicine: assessing the evidence for immunological benefits. Nat Rev Immunol2004;4:912–21.
32.
KarlsenRVFrederiksenKLarsenMB, et al. The impact of a breast cancer diagnosis on health-related quality of life. A prospective comparison among middle-aged to elderly women with and without breast cancer. Acta Oncol2016;55:720–7.
33.
WareJEKosinskiMTurner-BowkerDM, et al. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, 2007.
NissenNLundeAPedersenCG, et al. The use of complementary and alternative medicine after the completion of hospital treatment for colorectal cancer: findings from a questionnaire study in Denmark. BMC Complement Altern Med2014;14:388.
38.
KeeneMRHeslopIMSabesanSS, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract2019;35:33–47.
39.
MøllerSREkholmOChristensenAI.Trends in the use of complementary and alternative medicine between 1987 and 2021 in Denmark. BMC Complement Med Ther2024;24:23.
40.
ShanSLinLFangQ, et al. Massage therapy significantly improves cancer-related fatigue in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer2023;31:464.
41.
LeeSHKimJYYeoS, et al. Meta-analysis of massage therapy on cancer pain. Integr Cancer Ther2015;14:297–304.
42.
BelloniSBonucciMArrigoniC, et al. A Systematic review of systematic reviews and a pooled meta-analysis on complementary and integrative medicine for improving cancer-related fatigue. Clin Ther2023;45:e54–e73.
43.
ShneersonCTaskilaTGaleN, et al. The effect of complementary and alternative medicine on the quality of life of cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Complement Ther Med2013;21:417–29.
44.
ShmueliAShuvalJ.Are users of complementary and alternative medicine sicker than non-users?Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2007;4:251–5.
45.
OngCKPetersenSBodekerGC, et al. Health status of people using complementary and alternative medical practitioner services in 4 English counties. Am J Public Health2002;92:1653–6.
46.
KuoYHTsaySLChangCC, et al. Cancer impact, complementary/alternative medicine beliefs, and quality of life in cancer patients. J Altern Complement Med2018;24:276–81.
47.
SalamonsenAKruseTEriksenSH.Modes of embodiment in breast cancer patients using complementary and alternative medicine. Qual Health Res2012;22:1497–512.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
