Participants and Non-participants of Different Categories in a Health Survey: A Cross-sectional Register Study

Abstract

Participants and non-participants in a health survey of asbestos cement workers were compared, using data from public registers, i.e. variables of socio-medical relevance. The plant closed down in 1976 and 3 years later all living subjects, 985 persons, were offered a health examination. The participation rate was 57%. The non-participants were divided into four categories: I, those who answered the invitation but refused to participate; II, those who did not answer even after three invitations; III, those who answered and accepted but did not participate; and IV, those who participated partly. A very consistent pattern of differences between participants and non-participants was observed, the latter being significantly more often registered for Public Assistance, for heavy drinking habits or criminal offences, and had significantly lower incomes and occupational status. The sickness absence, however, was not significantly shorter among the participants. The non-participating categories II and III differed most from the participants. Category I was more similar to the participants than to the other non-participating categories. This heterogeneity of the non-response/non-participation concept should be considered when health survey data are interpreted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Austin, M. A. , Criqui, M. H. , Barrett-Connor, E. & Holdbrook, M. J. : The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol 114: 137–43, 1981.

2. Brogan, D. R. : Nonresponse in sample surveys. The problem and some solutions. Phys Ther 60: 1026–32, 1980.

3. Cobb, S. , King, S. & Chen, E. : Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a morbidity survey involving clinical examination. J Chron Dis 6: 95–108, 1957.

4. Criqui, M. H. , Austin, M. & Barrett-Connor, E. : The effect of non-response on risk ratios in a cardiovascular disease study. J Chron Dis 32: 633–8, 1979.

5. Criqui, M. H. , Barrett-Connor, E. & Austin, M. : Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study. Am J Epidemiol 108: 367–72, 1978.

6. Hedstrand, H. : Studies in preventive medicine with particular reference to detection and treatment of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. A feasibility study in middle-aged men. Academic dissertation. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis 222. Uppsala, 1975.

7. Heilbrun, L. K. , Nomura, A. & Stemmermann, G. N. : The effects of nonresponse in a prospective study of cancer. Am J Epidemiol 116: 353–63, 1982.

8. Holme, I. , Helgeland, A. , Hjermann, L. , Leren, P. & Lund-Larsen, P. G. : Four and two-thirds years incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged men. The Oslo Study. Am J Epidemiol 112: 149–60, 1980.

9. Misczynski, M. & Stern, E. : Detection of cervical and breast cancer. A community-based pilot study. Med Care 17: 304–13, 1979.

10.

10. Ohlson, C.-G. & Hogstedt, C.: A cohort study on mortality among Swedish asbestos cement workers. International Symposium on Prevention of Occupational Cancer, 21–24 April 1981, Helsinki, Finland.

11.

11. Peterson, B. , Kristenson, H. , Sternby, N. H. , Trell, E. , Fex, G. & Hood, B. : Alcohol consumption and premature death in middle-aged men. Br Med J 280: 14: 3–6, 1980.

12.

12. Svensson, H.-O. : Low back pain in forty to fortyseven year old men. II. Socio-economic factors and previous sickness absence. Scand J Rehab Med 14(2): 55–60, 1982.

13.

13. Tibblin, G. : A population study of 50-year-old men. An analysis of the non-participation group. Acta Med Scand 178: 453–9, 1965.

14.

14. Tibblin, G. , Welin, L. , Larsson, B. , Ljungberg, I.-L. & Svärdsudd, K. : The influence of repeated health examinations on mortality in a prospective cohort study, with a comment on the autopsy frequence. Scand J Soc Med 10: 27–32, 1982.