Quality of Hospital Data and DRGs

Abstract

Research on and application of DRG is frequently performed with the aid of computerized data. This study has been made to assess the importance of errors in hospital data bases for DRG research, and the financial consequences if DRG is used as a reimbursement system. For the same hospital stays information on the DRG grouping variables has been collected from medical records and a data base. Frequencies of errors in the data base for the DRG grouping variables (principal diagnosis, secondary diagnosis, complications, procedures, age and discharge status of death) and length of stay are given. DRG grouping is performed on the basis of both medical record and data base information. The analysis shows the DRG system to be robust towards errors in the data bases. The procedure used in many countries for testing the US DRG definitions with national data found in data bases is also considered to be robust towards errors. Data quality in the studied data base is sufficient for DRG research purposes. The factors giving the robustness are of a general nature and may also apply to other data bases. Quality of computerized data is a less critical factor for DRG than for other applications of such data. If the present data base had been used in financial connection the errors would have had almost no deteriorating effect on hospital incomes.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aas IHM.

DRG: Diagnose Relaterte Grupper. Trondheim, 1985 (NIS-rapport 3/85).

Høivik

Reiertsen

Kvalitet i Kirurgien. Statens Rasjonaliseringsdirektorat, Oslo, 1985.

Aas IHM.

Reliability of data in a computerized medical information system. 1988 (in prep.).

Hospital Administration Terminology. 2nd ed. Chicago: American Hospital Association Resource Center, 1986.

Klassifikasjon av sykdommer, ØMI, 8th ed. 1984.

Klassifikasjon av operasjoner, ØMI, new ed. 1983.

The International Classification of Diseases , 9th revision, Clinical Modification, vol 2: 1–3, 1980.

Federal register 1984;49: 34780–34790.

Martini

CJM

Hughes

Patton

A study of the validity of the hospital activity analysis information. Br J Prev Soc Med 1976;30: 180–6.

10.

Bindman

Eichenfield

Geller

Diagnosis-related groups: Physician and abstractor reliability and financial significance of errors. The Mt Sinai J Med 1984;51: 237–45.

11.

Jenkings

The quality of patient record data bases—are they good enough for studies of case mix. London, 1985 (unpublished).

12.

Institute of Medicine.

Reliability of national hospital discharge survey data. Washington, 1980.

13.

ØMI II Brukerhåndbok 17/3–81, Statens Institutt for Folkehelse, Kommunedatasentralen for Øst-Norge A/L.

14.

Institute of Medicine.

Reliability of hospital discharge abstracts. Washington, 1977.

15.

Barnard

Esmond

DRG-based reimbursement: The use of current and retrospective clinical data. Med Care 1981;19: 1071–82.

16.

Doremus

Michenzi

Data quality. An illustration of its potential impact upon a Diagnosis-Related Group's case mix index and reimbursement. Med Care 1983;21: 1001–11.

17.

Butts

Williams

DDR

Accuracy of hospital activity analysis data. Br Med J 1982;185: 506–7.