Occupational Cervico-Brachial Disorders among Dentists Psychosocial work Environment,Personal Harmony and Life-Satisfaction

Abstract

The aim of the investigation was to compare dentists with and without occupational cervico-brachial disorders with regard to some psychosocial variables (work environment, personal harmony and life-satisfaction) and professional position. The investigation is based on a questionnaire sent to 143 randomly selected official dentists in Malmöhus District and the Municipality of Malmö. Of these, 96 dentists had symptoms while 47 had not. Dentists with symptoms showed less satisfaction with their work environment than dentists without. Those with symptoms experienced their work load as being more unsatisfactory, were more burdened by anxiety, had poorer psychosomatic health and less confidence in the future than dentists without symptoms. These differences were significant between the groups. It was found that specialists, both with and without cervico-brachial symptoms, were more satisfied with their psychosocial work environment than general practitioners, especially regarding their personal control over their work and the stimulation of their work. The specialists also had more self-confidence and experienced less anxiety than general practitioners and head dentists.

Keywords

Neck/shoulder pain cervico-brachial disorders dentist psychosocial work environment psychosomatic disorders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Editorial. The work environment of the dentists. Tandläkartidningen 1989; 81: 206.

2. Falconer C . Work environment in private dental service. Tandläkartidningen 1984; 10:595–604 (in Swedish).

3. Hagberg M , Wegman DH . Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups. Brit J Ind Med 1987; 44: 602–8.

4. Hällgren N. Pain and discomfort in the locomotor system among dentists and dental nurses. A Report from the occupational health service in Blekinge Läns Landsting, 1985 (in Swedish).

5. Murtomaa H . Conceptions of dentists and dental nurses about ergonomics. Ergonomics 1983; 26: 879–86.

6. Katevuo K , Aitasaio K , Lehtinen R , Pietilä J. Skeletal changes in dentists and farmers in Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13: 23–5.

7. Rundcrantz BL , Johnsson B , Moritz U . Cervical pain and discomfort among dentists– a survey of pain and discomfort. Swed Dent J 1990; 14: 71–80.

8. Sederholm M. An investigation of the state of health and the work environment of the staffof the dental service. The occupational health service in Jönköpings Läns Landsting (in Swedish).

9. Rundcrantz BL, Johnsson B, Moritz U. Occupational cervico-brachial disorders among dentists. Analysis of ergonomics and locomotor functions. Swed Dent J (in press).

10.

10. Dehlin O , Berg S . Back symptoms and psychological perception of work. Scand J Rehabil Med 1977; 9: 61–5.

11.

11. Esbjönsson E. Personality and pain. Thesis. Gothenburg University, Department of Psychology, 1978 (in Swedish).

12.

12. Cooper C , Watts J , Baglioni Jr A J , Kelly M. Occupational stress among general practice dentists. J Occup Psychol 1988; 61: 163–74.

13.

13. Theorell T. Lundgren N , Luthman G , Elgstrand K . Men in work. Almqvist & Wiksell 1988; 7: 634–65 (in Swedish).

14.

14. Levi L. Stress and distress in response to psychosocial stimuli. Acta Med Scand 1972; Suppl 521.

15.

15. Frankenhaeuser M . Coping with stress at work. Int J Health Serv 1981; 11: 491–510.

16.

16. Gardell B . Scandinavian research on stress in working life. Int J Health Serv 1982; 12: 31–41.

17.

17. Maeda K . Occupational cervicobrachial disorder and its causative factors. J Hum Ergol 1977; 6: 193–202.

18.

18. Rubenowitz S . The questionnaires PSYV. Gothenburg University, Department of Psychology (in Swedish).

19.

19. Rubenowitz S. The psychology of organisation and leadership. Esselte Studium 1984: 1–95 (in Swedish).

20.

20. Weber A , Fussler C , O'Hanlon IF , Gierer R , Grandjean E . Psychophysiological effects of repetitive tasks. Ergonomics 1980; 23: 1033–46.

21.

21. Bejerot E . Dental piece work-inquiry of the psychosocial work environment. Department of stress Research Stockholm 1989; 216 (in Swedish, abstract in English).

22.

22. Arnetz BB , Hörte L-G , Hedberg A , Malker H . Suicide among Swedish dentists. Scand J Soc Med 1987; 15: 243–6.

23.

23. Powell M , Eccles J . The health and work of two professional groups: dentists and pharmacists. Dent Pract 1970; 20: 373–8.

24.

24. Kuorinka I , Jonsson B , Kilbom A et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergonomics 1987; 18: 3233–7.

25.

25. Rubenowitz S . Survey of the psychosocial work environment. Instruction. Gothenburg University, Department of Psyhology (in Swedish).

26.

26. Rubenowitz S . The questionnaires PAK. Gothenburg University, Department of Psychology (in Swedish).

27.

27. Guilford JP . Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. Fourth ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill 1965: 528.

28.

28. Nordemar R . Psychogenic pain from the locomotor apparatus. Läkartidningen 1980; 77: 237–9 (in Swedish).

29.

29. Karasek R . Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Quart 1970; 24: 285–308.

30.

30. Wilson B . Stress in dentistry: national survey. Dent Mang 1984; 24: 14–9.

31.

31. Kats CA . Stress factors operating in the dental office work environment. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30: 29–36.

32.

32. O'Shea R.M , Corah N Ayer W . Sources of dentist stress. J Dent Assoc 1984; 109: 48–51.

33.

33. Eli J , Judes H , Allerhand-Alexander Y. Dentists and dentistry. Attitude changes toward the chosen profession. Hum Relat 1989; 41: 929–37.

34.

34. Gardell B. Work organisation and human nature. The Swedish Work Environment Fund, 1987.

35.

35. Goldstein I.B. Role of muscle tension in personality theory. Psychol Bull 1964; 61: 413–25.